Skip to main content
Log in

Desogestrel: using a selective progestogen in a combined oral contraceptive

  • Published:
Advances in Contraception

Abstract

Desogestrel is the most selective progestogen used in oral contraceptives (OCs). The clinical characteristics of the monophasic combined OC containing 150 μg desogestrel and 30 μg EE per tablet (Marvelon) are in accordance with the strong progestogenic and minimal androgenic effects of desogestrel: a very high contraceptive efficacy is combined with minimal and, in the case of lipid metabolism, even potentially positive effects on metabolic parameters.

Through increasing the plasma levels of sex hormone binding globulin, and thereby decreasing the plasma levels of free testosterone, the desogestrel-containing OC also has substantial beneficial effects on acne.

Resumé

Le désogestrel est la progestérone sélective la plus utilisée dans les contraceptifs oraux. Les caractéristiques cliniques de ce contraceptif combiné monophasique contenant 150 μg de désogestrel et 30 μg EE par comprimé (Marvelon) sont conformes aux effets progestatifs puissants et androgènes minimes du désogestrel: sa haute efficacité contraceptive se combine avec des effets sur les paramètres métaboliques qui sont minimes, et même potentiellement positifs dans le cas du métabolisme des lipides.

En augmentant les niveaux plasmatiques de la globuline liant les hormones sexuelles, et en diminuant de ce fait les niveaux plasmatiques de la testostérone libre, les contraceptifs oraux contenant du désogestrel ont un effet bénéfique considérable sur l'acné.

Resumen

El desogestrel es la progesterona más selectiva empleada en los anticonceptivos orales. Las características clínicas de este anticonceptivo combinado monofásico que contiene 150 μg de desogestrel y 30 μg EE por comprimido (Marvelon) están de acuerdo con los efectos progestágenos potentes y andrógenos mínimos del desogestrel: su alta eficacia anticonceptiva se combina con efectos minimos sobre los parámetros metabólicos, y hasta potencialmente positivos en el caso del metabolismo de los lípidos.

Al aumentar los niveles plasmáticos de la globulina que enlaza las hormonas sexuales, y disminuyendo así los niveles plasmáticos de la testosterona libre, los anticonceptivos orales que contienen desogestrel tienen un considerable efecto benéfico sobre el acné.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Royal College of General Practitioners (1967). Oral contraception and thrombo-embolic disease.J. R. Coll. Gen. Pract.,13, 267–279

    Google Scholar 

  2. BottigerL.E. et al. (1980). Oral contraceptives and thromboembolic disease: effects of lowering oestrogen content.Lancet,1, 1097–1101

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. MannJ.I. et al. (1975). Myocardial infarction in young women with special reference to oral contraceptive practice.Br. Med. J.,2, 445–447

    Google Scholar 

  4. JickH. et al. (1978). Oral contraceptives and nonfatal myocardial infarction.J. Am. Med. Assoc.,239, 1403–1406

    Google Scholar 

  5. FrankP. (1984). Oral contraceptives and arterial disease — recent evidence from the Royal College of General Practitioners Oral Contraceptive Study.Singapore J. Obstet. Gynaecol.,15(1), 14–21

    Google Scholar 

  6. GordonT. et al. (1977). High density lipoprotein as a protective factor against coronary heart disease.Am. J. Med.,62, 707–714

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. FotherbyK. (1985). Oral contraceptives, lipids and cardiovascular disease.Contraception,31, 367–394

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. RekersH. et al. (1988). The new generation of monophasic oral contraceptives. In: KellerP.J. and SirtoriC. (eds.)Contraception into the Next Decade. Parthenon Press, Carnforth, pp. 13–24

    Google Scholar 

  9. CullbergG. et al. (1982). Central and peripheral effects of desogestrel 15–60 μg daily for 21 days in healthy female volunteers.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.,111, 21–28

    Google Scholar 

  10. SponaJ. et al. (1979). Ovulation inhibition with different doses of levonorgestrel and other progestogens: clinical and experimental investigations.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.,88, 7–15

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ketting, E.et al. (1983). Failure of contraception. In: Ketting, E.et al. (eds.)Abortus en Anticonceptie Anno 1982. Annual Report Stimezo Research. pp. 97–129

  12. RekersH. (1988). Multicenter trial of a monophasic oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol and desogestrel.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.,67, 171–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. BilottaP. et al. (1988). Clinical evaluation of a monophasic ethinylestradiol/desogestrel-containing oral contraceptive.Arzneimitt. Forsch.,38, 932–934

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. WouterszT.B. et al. (1983). A new ultra-low-dose combined oral contraceptive.J. Reprod. Med.,28, 81–84

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. WouterszT.B. et al. (1987). A low-dose triphasic oral contraceptive.Fertil. Steril.,47, 425–430

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DusterbergB. et al. (1989). Gestodene monophasic oral contraceptive: review and results of the worldwide clinical trial program. In: ElsteinM. (ed.)A New Specific Progestogen for Low-Dose Oral Contraception. Parthenon Press, Carnforth, pp. 45–56

    Google Scholar 

  17. CorsonS.L. (1990). Efficacy and clinical profile of a new oral contraceptive containing norgestimate.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.,152, 25–31

    Google Scholar 

  18. GodslandI.F. et al. (1990). The effects of different formulations of oral contraceptive agents on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism.N. Engl. J. Med.,323, 1375–1381

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. JarretR.J. (1984).Diabetes and Heart Disease. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  20. MillerN.E. (1987). Associations of high-density lipoprotein subclasses and apolipoproteins with ischemic heart disease and coronary atherosclerosis.Am. Heart J.,113, 589–597

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. KannelW.B. et al. (1971). Serum cholesterol, lipoproteins, and risk of coronary heart disease: the Framingham Study.Ann. Intern. Med.,74, 1–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. BonnarJ. (1987). Coagulation effects of oral contraceptives.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.,157, 1042–1048

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. CullbergG. et al. (1982). On the use of plasma proteins as indicators of the metabolic effects of combined oral contraceptives.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.,111, 47–54

    Google Scholar 

  24. GeisslerK.H. et al. (1990). Effects of Marvelon on acne vulgaris.Organorama,2, 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  25. Agustina, T. and Sabarudin, U. (1987). Laboratory examinations in lipid metabolism, some liver functions and blood coagulation factors of comparative study combined pill triphasic versus monophasic. Paper presented at XIth AOCOG Hongkong, 6–12 December 1987

  26. CrosignaniP.G., VergadoroF. et al. (1987). A study of the metabolic effects of monophasic gestodene and desogestrel preparations. In: ElsteinM. (ed.)Development of a New Gestodene-Containing Low-Dose Oral Contraceptive. Parthenon Press, Carnforth, pp. 105–110

    Google Scholar 

  27. FalsettiL. et al. (1987). A new low-dose estrogen oral contraceptive combination: effect on endocrine parameters and lipid status.Contraception,36, 489–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Freundl, G., Bruster, H.et al. (1982). Veraenderungen von Gerinnungsstatus und Dettstoffwechsel unter Marvelon. In: Haefeli, M. (ed.)Wirkung Kontrazeptiver Steroide auf u.a. Dysmenorrhoe, Endometrium, Fettstoffwechsel, Gonadotropine, Längenwachstum, Plasma Protein, Rezeptoren. pp. 62–74

  29. GaspardU.J. et al. (1985). Serum lipid and lipoprotein changes induced by new oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol plus levonorgestrel and desogestrel.Contraception,31, 395–408

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. HarvengtC. et al. (1988). Changes in lipoprotein composition in women receiving two low-dose oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol and gonane progestins.Contraception,37, 565–575

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jung HoffmanC. et al. (1987). Effect of two low-dose oral contraceptives containing gestodene or desogestrel upon serum lipid and lipoproteins.Acta Endocrinol.,283, 135–136

    Google Scholar 

  32. KloosterboerH.J. et al. (1986). Comparative effect of monophasic desogestrel plus ethinylestradiol on lipid metabolism.Contraception,34, 135–144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kostner, G. (1986). Personal communication

  34. MärzW., GrossW. et al. (1985). A randomized crossover comparison of two low-dose contraceptives: effects of serum lipids and lipoproteins.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.,153, 287–293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. PetersenK.R., SkoubyS.O. et al. (1988). Comparative trial of the effects on glucose tolerance and lipoprotein metabolism of two new oral contraceptives containing gestoden and desogestrel.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.,67, 37–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. SamsioeG. (1982). Study on the effect of 30 μg ethinylestradiol (EE) + 150 μg desogestrel on lipid and lipoprotein metabolism in healthy volunteers, also in comparison with 30 μg EE + 150 μg levonorgestrel.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.,111, 55–60

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schweppe, K-W. (1983). Smoking and lipid metabolism with Marvelon.Organorama,20, no. 20

    Google Scholar 

  38. van derVangeN., KloosterboerH.J. and HaspelsA.A. (1987). Effects of seven low-dose combined oral contraceptives in high density lipoprotein subfractions.Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.,94, 559–567

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. ZichellaL., AntoninR. et al. (1987). Metabolic evaluation of women using three different oral contraceptives: a comparison. In: GenazzaniA.R., VolpeA. and FachinettiF. (eds.)Gynaecological Endocrinology. Parthenon Press, Carnforth, pp. 399–403

    Google Scholar 

  40. BertoliniS. et al. (1987). Lipoprotein metabolism in women using oral contraceptives. In: GenazzaniA.R., VolpeA. and FachinettiF. (eds.)Gynecological Endocrinology. Parthenon Press, Carnforth, pp. 383–391

    Google Scholar 

  41. BertoliniS. et al. (1987). Effects of three oral contraceptive formulations on lipid metabolism.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.,66, 327–323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. CronaN., SilfverstolpeG. and SamsioeG. (1985). The effects of two gonane progestins alone and in combination with ethinylestradiol on serum lipoproteins.Eur. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Reprod. Biol.,19, 365–374

    Google Scholar 

  43. CullbergG., SamsioeG. et al. (1982). Two oral contraceptives, efficacy, serum proteins and lipid metabolism.Contraception,26, 229–243

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. NewtonJ.R. (1984). Studies with desogestrel for fertility regulation. In: HarrisonR.F., BonnarJ. and ThompsonW. (eds.)Fertility and Sterility. MTP Press Ltd, Lancaster, pp. 663–671

    Google Scholar 

  45. SchijfC.P.T., ThomasC.M.G. et al. (1984). The influence of the triphasic pill and a desogestrel-containing combination pill on some physical, biochemical and hormonal parameters: a preliminary report. In: HarrisonR.F., BonnarJ. and ThompsonW. (eds.)Fertility and Sterility. MTP Press Ltd, Lancaster, pp. 585–593

    Google Scholar 

  46. BerginkE.W., KloosterboerH.J. et al. (1984). Effects of levonorgestrel and desogestrel in low-dose oral contraceptive combinations on serum lipids, apolipoproteins A1 and B and glycosylated proteins.Contraception,30, 61–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is based on a presentation given at the Seventh International Meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception, which was held in Singapore on 4–11 November, 1990.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

op ten Berg, M. Desogestrel: using a selective progestogen in a combined oral contraceptive. Adv Contracept 7, 241–250 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01849414

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01849414

Keywords

Navigation