Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of two copper IUDs: the MLCu375 and the Nova-T

  • Published:
Advances in Contraception

Abstract

A comparative randomized trial was carried out on two intrauterine contraceptive devices: the Nova-T and the MLCu375. The IUDs were used by 1116 and 1237 women respectively, over a period of 2 years. The reasons for IUD removal were analyzed after one and two years using the life-table method. Statistically significant differences were found in the rates for pregnancy, expulsion and removal for bleeding and/or pain favoring the MLCu375 IUD.

Resumé

Une étude comparative randomisée a été effectuée sur deux dispositifs contraceptifs intrautérins: le Nova-T et le MLCu375. Ces stérilets ont été utilisés respectivement par 1116 et 1237 femmes sur une période de deux ans. On a analysé après un an et après duex ans, par la méthode des tables de survie, les raisons pour lesquelles ces DIU avaient été abandonnés. Des différences significatives du point de vue statistique ont été constatées dans les taux de grossesse, d'expulsion et de retrait pour cause de saignement et/ou de douleurs, et ces différences étaient favorables au dispositif MLCu375.

Resumen

Se hizo una prueba comparativa al azar de dos dispositivos anticonceptivos intrauterinos: el Nova-T y el MLCu375. Los DIU fueron usados por 1116 y 1237 mujeres respectivamente, durante un período de 2 años. Las razones para quitar un DIU fueron analizadas después de uno y dos años de uso empleando el método de tabla de vida. Se encontraron diferencias estadísticas significativas en las tasas de embarazo, expulsión y remoción por sangrado y/o dolor, siendo favorables para el MLCu375.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. RhemrevP.E.R., vanOsW.A.A., KleinhoutJ. and deNoyerC.C.A. (1985). Comparison of three multiload IUDs: MLCu250, MLCu375 and MLAgCu250.Adv. Contracept.,1, 31–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. ColeL.P., PottsD.M., ArandaC., BehlilovicB., EtmanE.S., MorenoJ. and RandicL. (1985). An evaluation of TCu380Ag and the Multiload Cu375.Fertil. Steril.,43, 214–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DeCastroA. and AnguianoJ.M. (1986). Comparative performance of two copper IUDs: Nova-T and MLCu375.Adv. Contracept.,2, 155–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De Castro, A., Gancedo, P., Anguiano, J.M., Perera, S., Aguilar, E. and Lopez-Salva, A. (1984). Influence of four copper intrauterine devices on hormonal endometrial receptors.2nd Annual Meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception (abstract No. 80), November 26–30, Jakarta, Indonesia

  5. De Castro, A., Gancedo, P., Contreras, F. and Lapena, G. (1986). Influence of three copper IUDs on hormonal endometrial receptors.4th Annual meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception, September 23–26, Chicago, IL, USA

  6. van derPasH., ThieryM. and vanOsW.A.A. (1984). Observations on the MLCu375. In:Research in Family Planning, V.Bonner (ed.), MTP Press, Lancaster, 129–138

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Castro, A. (1987). Measurement of endometrial cavity length.4th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception, September 23–26, Chicago, IL, USA

  8. De Castro, A., Garcia, J.I., Anguiano, J.M., Aguilar, E., Perera, S., Diaz-Caneja, C., Lopez-Salva, A. and Sanchez-Corral, F. (1983). Assessment of the intrauterine contraceptive device Multiload Cu250.1st Annual Meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception, November 5–9, Cairo, Egypt

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Castro, A., Perez-Iglesias, R., Vicandi, F. et al. Comparison of two copper IUDs: the MLCu375 and the Nova-T. Adv Contracept 3, 319–322 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01849288

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01849288

Keywords

Navigation