Skip to main content
Log in

Factor endowments and trade of the United States and Taiwan: The Leontief paradox re-examined

  • Published:
Empirical Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary purpose of this paper is to re-examine the compatibility of the factor endowment theorem with the foreign trade of both the United States and Taiwan. The study presents evidence that the so-called Leontief paradox may be attributable to technological gaps and factor intensity reversals between the two trading countries. In addition, the conditions for existence of the paradox are generalized. A distinctive feature of this study is that the technologies of both countries are taken into account. The findings reveal that if one-sided technical coefficients, of either the United States or Taiwan, are used for the empirical tests, the Leontief paradox tends to result. The paradox is likely to disappear when the Leontief index is derived from the technical coefficients of both trading countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, R.E.: Determinants of Commodity Structure of U.S. Trade. American Economic Review61, 1971, 126–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J.: The Pure Theory of International Trade: A Survey. A paper in American Economic Association's Surveys of Economic Theory,2, 1965, 156–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for International Economic Cooperation and Development (CIECD), Taiwan: Input-Output Table, Taiwan, 1969.

  • Granick, D.: The American Capital Position in Foreign Trade. Southern Economic Journal22, 1955, 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W.W.: Domestic Production and the Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-examined. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society97, 1953, 332–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • : Factor Proportions and the Structure of American Trade: Further Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics38, 1956, 384–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minhas, B.S.: An International Comparison of Factor Costs of Factor Use. Amsterdam 1963.

  • Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan: The Survey Report on Industry and Mining Sectors as of December 31, 1969 (in Chinese).

  • Taiwan's Customs Office: The Foreign Trade Statistics of Taiwan, 1969.

  • Tsao, J.T.H.: The International Trade of Taiwan, 1952–1972: A Combination of Theoretic, Economic and Input-Output Analyses. A paper presented at the Convention of the Econometric Society, Atlantic City, New Jersey, September 17, 1976.

  • —: Factor Endowments, Foreign Trade, and Economic Development. A paper presented at the 1979 American Economic Association Convention, Atlanta, Georgia, December 29, 1979.

  • United Nations: Commodity Trade Statistics 1969, Statistical Papers, Series D., 7626–7662.

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: Employment of Industries by Input-Output Classifications, 1967.

  • U.S. Department of Commerce: The Input-Output Structure of U.S. Economy, 1967. Survey of Current Business54, 1973, 32–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanek, J.: The Natural Resource Content of U.S. Foreign Trade, 1870–1955. Cambridge, Mass. 1963.

  • : The Factor Proportion Theory: Then-Factor Case. Kyklos21, 1968, 749–756.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am deeply indebted to Nobel Laureate Lawrence R. Klein for his valuable suggestions and wish to express my gratitude to Richard A. Marston and an anonymous referee for their helpful comments.

The views expressed here are entirely mine.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsao, J.T.H. Factor endowments and trade of the United States and Taiwan: The Leontief paradox re-examined. Empirical Economics 5, 245–253 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01848053

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01848053

Keywords

Navigation