Empirical Economics

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 109–127 | Cite as

Structural analysis and forecasts of commodity imports using cross-section relationships

  • A. Parikh
  • R. Edwards


The purpose of this paper is to propose alternative specifications which can be used for predicting imports by commodities for a large number of countries. Both “variety” and “scale” hypothesis have been made use of in suggesting simple cross-section relationships which can be easily used for predicting imports by commodities for any country of the world. Indeed, since detailed country characteristics are not taken into consideration in per capita income and population, it is likely that consistent under or overpredictions may result for a country when the estimated relationship is used. The extent of under or overprediction is reduced by using the variable elasticity formulation of the import demand function.

Our estimates of cross-section relationships show remarkable stability in structural coefficients for the period 1967–1973 on the two-digit S.I.T.C. data. A set of eight different relationships is estimated and using 1970 cross-section relationships forecasts for 1973 and 1980 are given. Forecasts of imports of 45 commodities for 37 countries were derived and compared with the corresponding actual 1973 figures. The root mean square error predictive criterion suggests that per capita income and population in a constant elasticity form performs reasonably well.


Structural Analysis Economic Theory Constant Elasticity Capita Income Demand Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balassa, B.: The Theory of Economic Integration. London 1962, p. 131.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, T.S.: The Variety Hypothesis as an Explanation of International Trade. Mimeographed, 1974.Google Scholar
  3. Beaumont, P., I. Prucha andV. Filatov: Performance of the LINK System: 1970 versus 1975 Base Year Trade Share Matrix. Empirical Economics4, 1979, 11–41.Google Scholar
  4. Chenery, H.B.: Patterns of Industrial Growth. American Economic Review50, 1960, 624–654.Google Scholar
  5. Chenery, H.B., andL.B. Taylor: Development Patterns Among Countries and Over Time. Review of Economics and Statistics50, 1968, 391–416.Google Scholar
  6. Chenery, H.B., andM. Syrquin: Patterns of Development, 1950–1970. Oxford 1977. Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge: The Determinants of Britain's Invisible Imports, 1949–1966. Monograph 10 in A Programme of Growth, London 1960.Google Scholar
  7. Dreze, J.: Quelques reflexions, sereines sur l'adaptation de l'industrie belge an March Commun, Comptes Rendus des Travaux de la Societe. Royale d'Economie Politique de Belgique 275, 1960.Google Scholar
  8. Goldfield, S.M., andR.E. Quandt: Some Tests for Homoscedasticity. Journal of American Statistical Association60, 1965, 539–547.Google Scholar
  9. Kravis, I.B., A.W. Heston andR. Summers: Real GDP Per Capita for More than One Hundred Countries. Economic Journal88, 1978, 215–242.Google Scholar
  10. Kuznets, S.: Six Lectures on Economic Growth. Glencoe II, New York 1964, 94–95.Google Scholar
  11. : Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations IX, Level and Structure of Foreign Trade: Comparison for Recent Years. Economic Development and Cultural Change13, 1964, 1–105.Google Scholar
  12. Linder, S.B.: An Essay on Trade and Transformation. New York 1961.Google Scholar
  13. Linnemann, H.: An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam 1966.Google Scholar
  14. Metzler, L.A.: A Multiple Region Theory of Income and Trade. Econometrica18, 1950, 329–354.Google Scholar
  15. Nerlove, M.: Returns to Scale in Electricity Supply Industry. Measurement in Economics. Ed. by C.F. Christ. Stanford, California, 1963, 167–198.Google Scholar
  16. Parikh, A., andP. Trivedi: Estimation of Cross-Section Production Functions under Structural Change in Indian Agriculture. To appear in A.U.T.E. Conference Volume. Ed. By D. Peel and D. Currie. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  17. Polak, J.J., andR. Rhomberg: Economic Instability in an International Setting. American Economic Review, Papers & Proceedings52, 1962, 110–118.Google Scholar
  18. Stapleton, D.C.: Inferring Long Term Substitution Possibilities from Cross-Section and Time-Series Data. Measuring and Modelling Natural Resource Substitutes. Ed. by E.R. Bennett and B.C. Field. Cambridge 1980.Google Scholar
  19. Taplin, G.B.: Models of World Trade. IMF Staff Papers14, 1967, 433–453.Google Scholar
  20. United Nations: Commodity Trade Statistics, Series D, 1966–1973.Google Scholar
  21. —: Yearbook of National Accounts Statistics, Vol. III, International Tables, 1973.Google Scholar
  22. —: Monthly Bulletin of StatisticsXXIX (3), March 1975.Google Scholar
  23. Waelbroeck, J.: On the Structure of International Trade Interdependence. Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles, 1965.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Parikh
    • 1
  • R. Edwards
    • 2
  1. 1.University of East Anglia, School of Economic and Social StudiesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichGreat Britain
  2. 2.University of AberdeenAberdeenGreat Britain

Personalised recommendations