Abstract
This paper examines whether information technology can play a strategic role in supporting regulatory reforms aimed at achieving voluntary cooperation with government regulation. Analysis of the case of electronic tax return lodgment in Australia suggests that the effects of IT are contextual, and identifies positive effects of the new IT system on voluntary cooperation. However, in this case, divergence between private and public interests and uncertainty and lack of participation in regulatory decision-making appear to restrict the development of voluntary cooperation as a primary basis for government regulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attwell, P. and Rule, J. (1988); Computing in organisations: what we know and what we don't know. Incomputer-supported cooperative work; I. Greif (ed.), San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman, pp 557–572.
Australian Taxation Office (1993); Did ELS achieve better service through people and technology? a portfolio evaluation of the impacts of the Electronic Lodgement Service. Canberra: 1992.
Ayres, I. and Braithwaite J. (1992);Responsive regulation: transcending the deregulation debate. New York: Oxford University Press.
Breyer, S. (1990); Regulation and deregulation in the United States. InDeregulation or reregulation?; G. Manjone (ed.), New York: St. Martin's Press, pp 7–58.
Donovan Research (1991); Tax agents' research. Canberra: Australian Taxation Office.
Dunlop, C. and Kling, R. (1990); Introduction. InComputerisation and controversy; C. Dunlop and R. Kling (eds.), New York: Academic Press, pp 1–12.
Emery, F.E. (1989);Towards real democracy. Toronto: Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre.
Emery, F.E. (1992); Adaptive systems for our future governance, Industry councils: comments on the Jackson Report, and The jury system and participative democracy. InParticipative design for participative democracy; M. Emery (ed.), Canberra: Australian National University Centre for Continuing Education, pp 185–210.
Emery, F.E. (1994); Causal path analysis. InThe social engagement of social science; E.L. Trist and H. Murray (eds.), Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, volume 3.
Hilgendorf, L., Clark, A. and Irving, B. (1967); The combined use of linkage and path analysis in the development of causal models;Human Relations, 20, 4, 375–387.
Hirscheim, R. (1985);Office Automation: a social and organisational perspective. New York: Wiley.
Joint Committee of Public Accounts (1993);An assessment of tax. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
Keisler, S., Seigel, J. and McGuire T. (1988); Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. InComputer-supported cooperative work; I. Greif (ed.), San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman, pp 657–676.
Manjone, G. (1990); Introduction. InDeregulation or reregulation?; G. Manjone (ed.), New York: St. Martin's Press, pp 1–6.
Morgan Research Centre (1994); Taxpack evaluation survey. Canberra: Australian Taxation Office.
National Review of Standards for the Tax Profession Steering Committee (1993); Discussion paper. Canberra: Australian Taxation Office.
Oliver, C. (1990); Determinants of interorganisational relationships: integration and future directions;Academy of Management Review, 15, 2, pp 24–265.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes;Academy of Management Review, 16, 1, pp 145–179.
O'Toole, J. (1988); Strategies of intergovernmental management: implementing programs in interorganisational networks;International Journal of Public Administration, 11, 4, pp 417–441.
Pedhazur, E.J. and Pedhazur Schmelkin, L. (1991);Measurement, design and analysis. Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Purchas, G. (1994); An examination of the tax practitioner's role in compliance. University of Newcastle Department of Commerce, Current issues in tax administration conference.
Rockart, J. and Short, J. (1989); IT in the 1990s: managing organisational interdependence;Sloan Management Review, winter: pp 7–17.
Scott, W.R. (1990). Technology and structure: an organisational-level perspective. InTechnology and organisations; P. Goodman and L. Sproull (eds.), San Francisco: Jossey Bass, pp 109–143.
Selznick, P. (1945); Foundations of the theory of organisations;American Sociological Review, 13, 1, pp 25–35.
Stern, R. (1981); Competitive influence on the regulation of college athletics;Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 1, pp 15–32.
Swann, D. (1988);The retreat of the state. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Thompson, J. (1967),Organisations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tomasic, R. and Pentony, B. (1990); Defining acceptable tax conduct: the role of professional advisers in tax compliance. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
Venkatraman, N. and Kambil, A. (1991); The check's not in the mail: strategies for electronic integration in tax return filing.Sloan Management Review, winter: 33–43.
Weick, K. (1990). Technology as equivoque: sensemaking in new technologies. InTechnology and organisations; P. Goodman and L. Sproull (eds.), San Francisco: Jossey Bass, pp 1–43.
Woolcott Research (1991); An evaluation of tax agents attitudes towards electronic lodgement service. Canberra: Australian Taxation Office.
Zald, M.N. (1978); On the social control of industries;Social Forces, 57, 1, pp 79–101.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, T.A. Information technology and regulatory reformThe interorganisational effects of a technological innovation . Comput Supported Coop Work 4, 281–296 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01846696
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01846696