Skip to main content
Log in

A qualitative study to explore the concept of fatigue/tiredness in cancer patients and in healthy individuals

  • Special Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interest in fatigue research has grown since the finding that fatigue/tiredness is the most frequently reported symptom of cancer and its treatment. But even though several authors have tried to conceptualise fatigue, its mechanisms are still poorly understood. The aim of this study was twofold: (a) to explore fatigue in cancer patients inductively, and (b) to compare experiences of fatigue/tiredness of healthy individuals with those of cancer patients to identify cancer-specific fatigue/tiredness and related concepts. A qualitative research strategy was adopted using a grounded-theory approach. The prospective study took place in the oncology department of the Kantonsspital, St. Gallen, Switzerland, with samples of 20 cancer patients and 20 healthy individuals. Unstructured, tape-recorded interviews were conducted to collect data. The transcripts of the interviews were analysed using content analysis and constant comparison. Different themes emerged between the two groups although both fitted a classification system that categorised fatigue into physical, affective and cognitive expressions of fatigue/tiredness. Physical signs were more frequent than affective and cognitive signs in both groups. In the cancer patients, fatigue involved decreased physical performance, extreme, unusual tiredness, weakness and an unusual need for rest, which was distinctly different for healthy persons. Affective and cognitive distress was also more prominent in cancer patients. Interestingly, the concept of malaise was not identified by either sample and not understood as an expression of fatigue by this German-speaking population. Linguistic differences in the description of fatigue/tiredness between healthy and ill individuals revealed different perceptions of the phenomenon. A step-like theory, explaining the production of fatigue/tiredness was tentatively put forward involving nociception, perception and expression of tiredness. The emerging concepts break tiredness/fatigue into an expression of physical, affective and cognitive tiredness/fatigue. The experience is different between healthy individuals and cancer patients. Care must be taken when drawing generalised conclusions but the results of the study identify and clarify ideas that might form an important basis for further, controlled studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Astair J (1987) Fatigue in the cancer patients: a conceptual approach to a clinical problem. Oncol Nurs Forum 14:25–30

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker C, Wuest J, Stern P (1992) Method slurring: the grounded theory/phenomenology example. J Adv Nurs 17:1355–1360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruera E (1988) Asthenia in patients with advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 18:81–87

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bruera E (1994) New developments in the assessment of pain in cancer patients. J Support Care Cancer 2:312–318

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chalmers AF (1982) What is this thing called science? Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chenitz WC (1984) Surfacing nursing process: a method for generating nursing theory from practice. J Adv Nuts 9:205–215

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cimprich B (1992) A theoretical perspective on attention and patient education. Adv Nurs Sci 14:39–51

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clarke L (1995) Nursing research: science, visions and telling stories. J Adv Nurs 21:584–593

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Field P, Morse J (1985) Nursing research: the application of qualitative approaches. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gibson H, Edwards R (1985) Muscular exercise and fatigue. Sports Med 2:121

    Google Scholar 

  11. Glaus A (1993) Assessment of fatigue in cancer and non-cancer patients and in healthy individuals. J Support Care Cancer 1:305–315

    Google Scholar 

  12. Glaser B (1978) Theoretical sensitivity. Sociological Press, Mill Valley, Calif

    Google Scholar 

  13. Glaser B, Strauss A (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Aldine, New York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon M (1986) Differential diagnosis of weakness: a common geriatric symptom. Geriatrics 41:75–79

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grandjean E (1970) Fatigue. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 31:401–411

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Harris M (1968) The rise of anthropological theory. Crowell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hürny C, Bernhard J (1993) Fatigue and Malaise as a quality of life indicator in small-cell lung cancer patients. J Support Care Cancer 1:316–320

    Google Scholar 

  18. Irvine D, Vincent L, Graydon J (1994) The prevalence and correlates of fatigue in patients receiving treatment with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Cancer Nurs 17:367–378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobashi J, Hanewald G, Van Dam F (1985) Assessment of malaise in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Cancer Nurs 8:306–313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mac Vicar MG, Winningham ML (1986) Promoting the functional capacity of cancer patients. Cancer Bull 38:235–239

    Google Scholar 

  22. Melia KM (1992) Tell it as it is — qualitative methodology and nursing research: understanding the student nurses' world. J Adv Nurs 12:331–337

    Google Scholar 

  23. Miles M, Huberman A (1984) Qualitative data analysis: a source book of new methods. Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif

    Google Scholar 

  24. Morant R (1991) Asthenia in cancer patients — a double edged inflammatory response against the tumour? J Palliat Care 7:22–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morse J (1989) Qualitative nursing research: a free-for-all? In: Morse J (ed) Qualitative nursing research: a contemporary dialogue. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif

    Google Scholar 

  26. Omery A (1983) Phenomenology, a method for nursing research. Adv Nurs Sci 5:49–63

    Google Scholar 

  27. Oppenheim AN (1992) Questionnaire, design, interviewing and attitude measurement. Pinter, London

    Google Scholar 

  28. Piper B (1993) Fatigue. In: Carrieri V, Lindsey A, West C (eds) Pathophysiological phenomena in nursing, human response to illness. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 279–302

    Google Scholar 

  29. Piper B, Lindsey A (1989) Development of an instrument to measure the subjective dimension of fatigue. In: Funk S, Tornquist E (eds) Key aspects of comfort. Springer, New York Heidelberg Berlin, pp 199–208

    Google Scholar 

  30. Piper B, Rieger P (1989) Recent advances in the management of biotherapy-related side effects: fatigue. Oncol Nurs Forum 16 [Suppl]:27–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Polit D, Hungler B (1993) Essentials of nursing research. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  32. Schag C, Heinrich R, Ganz P (1984) Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity and guidelines. J Clin Oncol 2:187–193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. St Pierre B, Kasper CE (1992) Fatigue mechanisms in patients with cancer: effects of tumor necrosis factor and exercise on skeletal muscle. Oncol Nurs Forum 19:419–425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Weis E (1990) PONS Kompaktwörterbuch. Klett, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  35. Winingham M, Nail L, et al (1994) Fatigue and the cancer experience: the state of the knowledge. Oncol Nurs Forum 21:23–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glaus, A., Crow, R. & Hammond, S. A qualitative study to explore the concept of fatigue/tiredness in cancer patients and in healthy individuals. Support Care Cancer 4, 82–96 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01845757

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01845757

Key words

Navigation