Advertisement

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 229–240 | Cite as

A graphical approach to the analysis of censored data

  • Robert Gentleman
  • John J. Crowley
Article

Summary

The presence of censoring has hampered the graphical exploration of survival data. We present several graphical approaches to the analysis of such data here, many based on functionals of the distribution function and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the distribution function. Topics covered include comparing two samples, comparing many samples, and regression.

Key words

box plots censored data curve-difference chart graphical methods Kaplan-Meier estimator quantile-quantile plot rank plot regression smoothing survivor function 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cleveland WS, McGill R: Graphical perception: theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. J Am Stat Assoc 79:531–554, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cleveland WS, McGill R: Graphical perception: the visual decoding of quantitative information on graphical displays of data (with discussion). J Royal Stat Soc [A] 150:192–229, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gentleman R, Crowley J: Graphical methods for censored data. J Am Stat Assoc 86:678–683, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gentleman R, Crowley J: Local full likelihood estimation for the proportional hazards model. Biometrics 47:1283–1296, 1991.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL: The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cox DR, Oakes D: Analysis of Survival Data. Chapman and Hall, London, 1984.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481, 1958.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pike MC: A method of analysis of a certain class of experiments in carcinogenesis. Biometrics 22:142–161, 1966.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sause WT, Crowley JJ, Rotman M, Mowry PA, Bouzaglou A, Borst JR, Selin H: Solitary brain metastasis: results of an RTOG/SWOG protocol evaluation. Surgery and radiation therapy versus radiation therapy alone. Am J Clin Oncol 13:427–432, 1990.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Michael JR: The stabilized probability plot. Biometrika 70:11–17, 1983.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cox DR: Some remarks on the role in statistics of graphical methods. Applied Statistics 27:4–9, 1978.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gentleman R, Crowley J: Smoothing censored data. Technical Report 90–13, University of Waterloo, Dept. of Statistics and Actuarial Science, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Gentleman
    • 1
  • John J. Crowley
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Statistics and Actuarial ScienceUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research CenterSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations