Veterinary Research Communications

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 317–325 | Cite as

Reference interval and critical difference for canine serum fructosamine concentration

  • A. L. Jensen
  • H. Aaes
Clinical Chemistry

Abstract

The purposes of the study were to obtain a reference interval and to calculate the critical difference between two analytical results for canine serum fructosamine concentration. To obtain a reference interval, the serum fructosamine concentration was measured in blood samples from 29 adult dogs after a 15-h fasting period. To calculate the critical difference, blood samples from 20 apparently clinically healthy dogs were collected once weekly for five consecutive weeks, and the total variance of the analytical results was divided into the component of variance between dogs (S inter 2 ), the component of variance for weeks within dogs (S intra 2 ) and the component of variance for measurements (S anal 2 ), using nested analysis of variance. The critical difference was then calculated fromS intra 2 andS anal 2 .

The main conclusions are in summary: The reference interval for canine serum fructosamine concentration is 258.6–343.8 µmol/L, and the critical difference between two consecutive measurements on a week-to-week basis is 32.4 µmol/L. The critical difference may be used as a guideline to indicate potentially important changes in the serum fructosamine concentration, though the analytical results should not be assessed by the critical differences alone, but should also be compared to the corresponding reference intervals.

Keywords

dog fructosamine ketoamine serum variation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernstein, R.E., 1987. Nonenzymatically glycosylated proteins.Advances in Clinical Chemistry,26, 1–78Google Scholar
  2. Bunn, H.F., Gabbay, K.H. and Gallop, P.M., 1978. The glycosylation of hemoglobin: Relevance to diabetes mellitus.Science,200, 21–27Google Scholar
  3. Cantley, C.E.L., Ford, C.M. and Heath, M.F., 1991. Serum fructosamine in ovine pregnancy toxaemia: a possible prognostic index.Veterinary Record,128, 525–526Google Scholar
  4. Costongs, G.M.P.J., Janson, P.C.W., Bas, B.M., Hermans, J., Van Wersch, J.W.J. and Brombacher, P.J., 1985. Short-term and long-term intra-individual variations and critical differences of clinical chemistry laboratory parameters.Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry,23, 7–16Google Scholar
  5. Feldman, E.C. and Nelson, R.W., 1987. Diabetes mellitus. Canine diabetes mellitus. In: D. Pedersen (ed.),Canine and Feline Endocrinology and Reproduction, 1987, (W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia), 229–273Google Scholar
  6. Heath, M.F. and Connan, R.M., 1991. Interaction ofOstertagia andNematodirus species in sheep and the potential of serum fructosamine determination in monitoring gastrointestinal parasitism.Research in Veterinary Science,51, 322–326Google Scholar
  7. Hölzel, W.G.E., 1987a. Intra-individual variation of some analytes in serum of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.Clinical Chemistry,33, 57–61Google Scholar
  8. Hölzel, W.G.E., 1987b. Intra-individual variation of some analytes in serum of patients with chronic renal failure.Clinical Chemistry,33, 670–673Google Scholar
  9. Hölzel, W.G.E., 1987c. Intra-individual variation of analytes in serum from patients with chronic liver diseases.Clinical Chemistry,33, 1133–1136Google Scholar
  10. Jensen, A.L., 1992. Serum fructosamine in canine diabetes mellitus. An initial study.Veterinary Research Communications,16, 1–9Google Scholar
  11. Jensen, A.L., Houe, H. and Nielsen, C.G., 1992. Critical differences of clinical chemical parameters in blood from Red Danish dairy cows.Research in Veterinary Science,52, 86–89Google Scholar
  12. Kaneko, J.J., 1989. Carbohydrate metabolism and its diseases. In: J.J. Kaneko (ed.),Clinical Biochemistry of Domestic Animals, 4th edn., (Academic Press, San Diego), 44–85Google Scholar
  13. Koenig, R.J., Peterson, C.H., Jones, R.L., Saudek, C., Lehrman, M. and Cerami, A., 1976. Correlation of glucose regulation and hemoglobin A1c in diabetes mellitus.New England Journal of Medicine,295, 417–420Google Scholar
  14. Mahaffey, E.A. and Cornelius, L.M., 1982. Glycosylated hemoglobin in diabetic and nondiabetic dogs.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association,180, 635–637Google Scholar
  15. Pascoe, P.J., Gallagher, C.S. and Fraser, C.G., 1984. Components of biological variation of some serum analytes in hospitalized pregnant women.Clinical Chemistry,30, 583–584Google Scholar
  16. Peacock, I., 1984. Glycosylated haemoglobin: measurement and clinical use.Journal of Clinical Pathology,37, 841–851Google Scholar
  17. Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G., 1967. One-way classifications. Analysis of variance. In:Statistical Methods, 6th edn., (Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA), 258–298Google Scholar
  18. Smith, J.E., Wood, P.A. and Moore, K., 1982. Evaluation of a colorimetric method for canine glycosylated hemoglobin.American Journal of Veterinary Research,43, 700–701Google Scholar
  19. Stamm, D., 1982. A new concept for quality control of clinical laboratory investigations in the light of clinical requirements and based on reference method values.Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry,20, 817–824Google Scholar
  20. Willms, B. and Lehmann, P., 1990. A new fructosamine-test as a routine parameter in diabetes monitoring.Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift Supplementum 180,102, 5–10Google Scholar
  21. Wood, P.A. and Smith, J.E., 1980. Glycosylated hemoglobin and canine diabetes mellitus.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association,176, 1267–1268Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers bv 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. L. Jensen
    • 1
  • H. Aaes
    • 2
  1. 1.Central Laboratory, Department of Clinical StudiesThe Royal Veterinary and Agricultural UniversityFrederiksberg CDenmark
  2. 2.Department of PharmacologyLeo Pharmaceutical ProductsBallerupDenmark

Personalised recommendations