Protoplasma

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 427–434 | Cite as

Redox polarity of the amphibian egg and its relationship to the bioelectric polarity of the egg

  • W. A. Dorfman
Abhandlungen

Summary

  1. 1.

    A polar distribution of loci with different aerobic reduction potentials has been shown to exist in the unfertilized egg of the frog,Rana temporaria.

     
  2. 2.

    A similar distribution of loci with different pH-values has also been established in the egg by means of the electrometric method.

     
  3. 3.

    The more alkaline animal hemisphere shows a more negative reduction-potential than the more acid vegetative one though the rH2-values at both the poles practically coincide (rH2=approx. 20).

     
  4. 4.

    The oxidation-reduction polarity of the egg is, therefore, opposite in sign to that found previously in bioelectric experiments. This is to be regarded as an experimental evidence against some views which try to identify both kinds of potentials.

     

Keywords

Experimental Evidence Reduction Potential Similar Distribution Polar Distribution Rana Temporaria 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. 1.
    Dorfman, 1934. Protoplasma21.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Spek, 1930–1934. Protoplasma9, 18, 21.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck, 1933. Journ. Cell. & Comp. Physiol.3.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Michaelis, 1933. Oxydations-reductions-potentiale, Berlin.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Machlis &Green, 1933. Journ. Cell. & Comp. Physiol.4.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Green, Stickland &Tarr, 1934. Biochem. Journ.28.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dorfman, 1936. Protoplasma25.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.Brachet, 1934. Arch. de Biol.45.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Konopacki, 1926. Bul. Acad. Polon. B.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Borsook &Schott, 1933. Science77.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Francis, 1934. Journ. Exper, Biol.10.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beutner &Lozner, 1933. Protoplasma19;Beutner 1933. “Physical Chemistry of Living Tissues and Life Processes”. Baltimore.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lehman, 1934. Biochem. Zeitschr.274.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gicklhorn, 1929. Elektrostatik in der Biochemie. Dresden.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Umbath, 1929. Elektrostatik in der Biochemie. Dresden.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger 1936

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. A. Dorfman
    • 1
  1. 1.Physico-Chemical Department of the Biochemical A. Bach InstituteUSA

Personalised recommendations