Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp 219–222 | Cite as

Prediction of hormone responsiveness by mammographic parenchymal pattern in advanced primary breast cancer

  • Niels Stig Møller Nielsen
  • Jørn Andersen
  • Hans Skovgaard Poulsen
  • Ole Mathiessen
Report

Summary

Ninety-two women with advanced, unilateral breast cancer were classified according to the Wolfe and Nottingham classifications of mammographic parenchymal pattern (MPP). Both classifications of MPP were significantly correlated to the estrogen receptor (ER) status of the breast carcinoma, but could not be used for prediction of response to hormonal therapy. Age distribution was significantly different among Wolfe types as well as between ER groups, but a multiple regression analysis showed that both age and Wolfe pattern were significant and independent predictors of the ER status.

Key words

advanced breast cancer estrogen receptor hormone response mammographic parenchymal pattern 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nielsen NSM, Poulsen HS: Relation between mammographic findings and hormonal receptor content in breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 145: 501–504, 1985Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broberg A, Glas U, Gustafsson SA, Hellstrom L, Somell A: Relation between mammographic pattern and estrogen receptor content in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 3: 201–207, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hinton CP, Roebuck EJ, Williams MR, Blamey RW, Glaves J, Nicholson RI, Griffiths K: Mammographic parenchymal patterns: Value as a predictor of hormone dependency and survival in breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 144: 1103–1107, 1985Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ciatto S, Cecchini S, Iossa A, Grazzini G, Messeri G, Valenti L, Nunzi G, Bartolucci R, Costanzo FD: Association of estrogen receptors with parenchymal pattern at mammography. Radiology 170: 695–697, 1989PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wolfe JN: Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 37: 2486–2492, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roebuck EJ: The importance of mammographic parenchymal patterns. Br J Radiol 55: 387–398, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hayward JL, Carbone PP, Heuson J-C, Kumaoka S, Segaloff A, Rubens RD: Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 13: 89–94, 1977Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andersen J, Ørntoft TE, Poulsen HS: Immunohistochemical demonstration of estrogen receptors (ER) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human breast cancer tissue by use of a monoclonal antibody to ER. J Histochem Cytochem 36: 1553–1560, 1988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boyd NF, Fishell E, Tonkin K, Mobbs BG: Age as a confounding factor in the association of mammographic dysplasia and estrogen receptor concentration in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 10: 51–54, 1987PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Niels Stig Møller Nielsen
    • 1
  • Jørn Andersen
    • 2
  • Hans Skovgaard Poulsen
    • 3
  • Ole Mathiessen
    • 4
  1. 1.Dept. of Radiology R.The Aarhus University HospitalAarhus CDenmark
  2. 2.Dept. of OncologyRadiumstationenAarhus CDenmark
  3. 3.Danish Cancer Society, Department of Experimental Clinical OncologyRadiumstationen, Aarhus KommunehospitalAarhus CDenmark
  4. 4.Radiumstationen, Aalborg SygehusAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations