Skip to main content
Log in

Minimal dynamic characterization of tree-like multibody systems

  • Published:
Nonlinear Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamic model of tree-like multibody systems is linear with respect to the parameters of mass distribution for instance when barycentric parameters are used. Thus, assuming that the parameters related to the kinematics are perfectly known, these quantities can be estimated through linear regression techniques. The necessary data are obtained by measuring the joint forces and/or torques and the resulting motion given in terms of positions, velocities and accelerations. An alternative method uses measurements of the reaction forces and torques applied to the bedplate.

The linearity of the dynamic and reaction models with respect to the barycentric quantities does not however imply that the latter constitute the minimum set of parameters characterizing the mass distribution of the system. In other words, some barycentric parameters may disappear from the models or may be redundant in the sense that they appear only via linear combinations. In the first case they are not identifiable, while in the second case the linear regression technique leads to estimated values which are correct for the combinations but can be erroneous for the individual parameters.

The various options taken to derive the dynamic and reaction models by use of the ROBOTRAN programme are briefly reviewed. Then the rules leading to the minimal parametrization are presented and illustrated by means of a practical example related to a robot calibration problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mayeda, H., Osuka, K., and Kangawa, A., ‘A new identification method for serial manipulator arms’, inIFAC 9th World Congress, Budapest, Hungary, July 2–6, 1984, pp. 74–79.

  2. Gautier, M., ‘Identification of robot dynamics’, inProceedings IFAC Symposium on Theory of Robots, Vienna, Austria, December 1986, pp. 351–367.

  3. Atkeson, C. G., An, C. H., and Hollerbach, J. M., ‘Estimation of inertial parameters of manipulator loops and links’,International Journal of Robotics Research 5(3), 1986, 101–119.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferreira, E. P., ‘Contribution à l'identification des paramètres et à la commande dynamique adaptive des robots manipulateurs’, Thesis, Université Paul Sabatier de Toulouse, 6 July 1984.

  5. Maes, P., Samin, J. C., and Willems, P. Y., ‘Linearity of multibody systems with respect to barycentric parameters: Dynamics and identification models obtained by symbolic generation’,Mechanics of Structures and Machines 17(2), 1989, 219–237.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Duelen, J. and Schroër, K., ‘Robot calibration: Method and results’,Robotic and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 8, 1991, 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maes, P., Samin, J. C., and Willems, P. Y., ‘AUTODYN and ROBOTRAN: Computer programmes’, inMultibody Systems Handbook, W. Schiehlen (ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990, pp. 225–264.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Raucent, B., Samin, J. C., and Willems, P. Y., ‘Identification of dynamic parameters of robot manipulators from external measurements’,European Journal of Mechanical Engineering 34, 1989, 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Raucent, B., Campion, G., Bastin, G., Samin, J. C., and Willems, P. Y., ‘Identification of the barycentric parameters of robot manipulators from external measurements’,Automatica 28(5), 1992, 1011–1016.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Raucent, B. and Samin, J. C., ‘Modeling and identification of dynamic parameters of robot manipulators’, inRobot Calibration, R. Bernhardt and S. Albright (eds.), Chapman & Hall, London, 1993, pp. 197–232.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Khalil, W. and Kleinfinger, J. F., ‘A new geometric notation for open and closed-loop robots’, inProceedings IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, April 1986, pp. 1174–1180.

  12. Wittenburg, J.,Dynamics of Systems of Rigid Bodies, B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart, Germany, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gautier, M., ‘Contribution à la modélisation et à l'identification des robots’, Thesis, Université de Nantes, 1990.

  14. Raucent, B., ‘Identification des paramètres dynamiques des robots manipulateurs’, Thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1990.

  15. Gautier, M. and Khalil, W., ‘Direct calculation of a minimum set of inertial parameters of serial robot’,IEEE Transaction on Robotics and Automation 5(3), 1990, 368–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, S. K., ‘An identification method for estimating the inertial parameters of a manipulator’,Journal of Robotics Systems 9(4), 1992, 505–528.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Raucent, B. and Samin, J. C., ‘Minimal parametrization of robot dynamic models’,Mechanics of Structures and Machines 22(3), 1994, 371–396.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tarn, T. J., Bejczy, A. K., Shuotiao, H., and Xiaoping, Y., ‘Inertial parameters of Puma 560 robot arm’, Rapport 63130, Department of Systems Sciences and Mathematics, Washington University September 1985.

  19. Armstrong, B., Khatlib, O., and Burdick, J., ‘The explicit dynamic model and inertial parameters of the PUMA 560 arm’, inProceedings IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1986, pp. 510–518.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fisette, P., Raucent, B. & Samin, J.C. Minimal dynamic characterization of tree-like multibody systems. Nonlinear Dyn 9, 165–184 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833299

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833299

Key words

Navigation