Abstract
A class of allocation schemes is axiomatized for the allocation of variable costs to activities performed sequentially when their order of performance is not fixed in advance and costs depend on this order. An upper bound on the amount charged to each activity is assumed to be given. This bound is independent of the processing order and can be more or less than the cost the activity would incur if it were performed alone. Our axioms for fair allocation lead to a restricted (but nonunique) class of allocation schemes whose restrictions depend on whether the sum of the bounds is less than or more than the sum of the costs incurred when each activity is performed alone.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balachandran BV, Ramakrishnan RTS (1981) Joint cost allocation: a unified approach. Accounting Rev 56:85–96
Billera LJ, Heath DC (1982) Allocation of shared costs: a set of axioms yielding a unique procedure. Math Oper Res 7:32–39
Fishburn PC, Pollak HO (1983) Fixed-route cost allocation. Am Math Monthly 90:366–378
Fishburn PC, Pollak HO (1987) Proportional allocation schemes for tour costs. Eur J Oper Res 31:24–30
Fujishige S, Katoh H, Icimori T (1988) The fair resource allocation problem with submodular constraints. Math Oper Res 13:164–173
Kalai E (1977) Proportional solutions to bargaining situations: interpersonal utility comparisons. Econometrica 45:1623–1630
Littlechild SC (1975) Common costs, fixed charges, clubs and games. Rev Econ Stud 42:117–124
Mirman LJ, Tauman Y (1982) Demand compatible equitable cost sharing prices. Math Oper Res 7:40–56
Shubik M (1962) Incentives, decentralized control, the assignment of joint costs and internal pricing. Manag Sci 8:325–343
Thomas AL (1980) A behavioral analysis of joint-cost allocation and transfer pricing. Stipes
Young HP (ed) (1985) Fair allocation. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fishburn, P.C. Fair cost allocation schemes. Soc Choice Welfare 7, 57–69 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01832921
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01832921