Skip to main content
Log in

Cyclic tournaments and cooperative majority voting: A solution

  • Published:
Social Choice and Welfare Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new solution concept is axiomatically characterized for tournaments that represent cooperative majority voting. The predicted set of outcomes lies inside the top-cycle set, the uncovered set, and the Banks set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banks JS (1985) Sophisticated voting outcomes and agenda control. Soc Choice Welfare 4:295–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks JS, Bordes GA (1988) Voting games, indifference, and consistent sequential choice rules. Soc Choice Welfare 5:31–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes G (1976) Consistency, rationality, and collective choice. Rev Econ Stud 43:447–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DE (1977) Computational criteria for voting systems. Br J Polit Sci 7:85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Deb R (1977) On Schwartz's rule. J Econ Theory 16:103–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta B (1988) Covering sets and a new Condorcet choice correspondence. J Econ Theory 44:63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquharson R (1969) Theory of voting. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn JA, Grether D (1974) On a class of rational social decision procedures. J Econ Theory 8:471–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1977) Condorcet social choice functions. SIAM J Appl Math 33:469–489

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvakov B, Vol'skiy V (1985) Tournament methods in choice theory. Social Science Working Paper 558, Cal Tech

  • May KO (1954) Intransitivity, utility, and the aggregation of preference patterns. Econometrica 22: 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarvey DC (1953) A theorem on the construction of voting paradoxes. Econometrica 21:608–610

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey RD (1986) Covering, dominance, and institution free properties of social choice. Am J Polit Sci 30:283–314

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey RD, Niemi RG (1978) A multistage game representation of sophisticated voting for binary procedures. J Econ Theory 18:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller NR (1980) A new solution set for tournaments and majority voting. Am J Polit Sci 24:68–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller NR (1983) The covering relation in tournaments: Two corrections. Am J Polit Sci 27:382–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller NR, Grofman B, Feld S (1986) Cycle avoiding trajectories in majority voting tournaments. Working paper, School of Social Science, University of California, Irvine

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon J (1968) Topics on tournaments. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H (1979) Dominance solvable voting schemes. Econometrica 47:1337–1351

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H (1986) Choosing from a tournament. Soc Choice Welfare 3:271–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordeshook PC, Schwartz T (1987) Agendas and the control of Political outcomes. Am Polit Sci Rev 81:179–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard DJ (1975a) A note on Wittgenstein and cyclical comparatives. Analysis 36:37–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard DJ (1975b) On the impossibility of measurement. Utah Academy Proceedings 52 (Part 2):36–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard DJ (1982) Cyclical preference logic. Theory Decision 14:415–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz T (1970) On the possibility of rational policy evaluation. Theory Decision 1:89–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz T (1972) Rationality and the myth of the maximum. Noûs 6:97–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz T (1977) Collective choice, separation of issues, and vote trading. Am Polit Sci Rev 71:999–1010

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz T (1986) The logic of collective choice. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepsle KA, Weingast BR (1984) Uncovered sets and sophisticated voting outcomes with implications for agenda control. Am J Polit Sci 28:49–74

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by NSF grants SES 8612120 and SES 8896228. I thank Georges Bordes, Gary Cox, Bhaskar Dutta, Richard McKelvey, Nicholas Miller, Emerson Niou, Peter Ordeshook, and Peyton Young for helpful comments. Niou is responsible for the example in Sect. 4. Presented at the Public Choice Society Meetings, Tucson, March 1987, and at the Jacob Marschak Interdisciplinary Colloquium on Mathematics in the Behaviorial Sciences, UCLA, October 1988.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwartz, T. Cyclic tournaments and cooperative majority voting: A solution. Soc Choice Welfare 7, 19–29 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01832917

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01832917

Keywords

Navigation