Skip to main content
Log in

Courseware reviews

  • Published:
Computers and the Humanities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Blair, D. C. and M. E. Maron. “An Evaluation of Retrieval Effectiveness for a Full-Text Document Retrieval System.”Communications of the ACM, 28, 3 (1985), 289–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowden-Clarke, Mary.The Complete Concordance to Shakespeare: Being a Verbal Index to All the Passages in the Dramatic Works of the Poet. Boston: Little and Brown, 1845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Marguerite. “The KWIC Index Concept: A Retrospective View.”American Documentation, 17 (1966), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligelstone, Steve. “Developing a Scheme for Annotating Text to Show Anaphoric Relations.”New Directions in English Language Corpora: Methodology, Results, Software Developments. Ed. Gerhard Leitner. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligelstone, Steve. “Some Reflections on the Question of Teaching, from a Corpus Linguistics Perspective.”ICAME Journal, 17 (1993), 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, John. “Which Concordancer? A Comparative Review of MS-DOS Software.”System, 19 (1991), 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofland, Knut. “Concordance Programs for Personal Computers.”English Computer Corpora: Selected Papers and Research Guide. Eds. Stig Johansson and Anna-Brita Stenström. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhn, H. P. “Keyword-In-Context Index for Technical Literature (KWIC Index).”American Documentation, 11, 4 (1960), 288–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribble, Chris and Glyn Jones.Concordances in the Classroom: A Resource Book for Teachers. London: Longman, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Joseph A. Feustle, Jr. is a Professor of Latin American Literature at the University of Toledo. In addition to articles on computers, he has published on the Latin American essay, novel, poetry and theater.

Paul T. Keyser is Prescott W. Townsend Asst. Professor (a research professorship), in the Dept. of Classics at Cornell. He holds doctorates in Physics and Classics, and works on control experiments in stylometry, as well as on Latin prose and Ancient Greek Science (and some modern physics). See: “Stylometric Method and the Chronology of Plato's Works,” Bryn Mawr Classical Review,3 (1992), 58–74; “The Length and Scansion of Propertius II as Evidence for Book Division,” Philologus,136 (1992), 81–88.

Catherine N. Ball is an assistant professor of linguistics at Georgetown University and a former professional software developer. She is the author of articles on computational linguistics, corpus linguistics, and the history of the English language.

Kathryn B. Taylor is a graduate student in linguistics at Georgetown University and a professional computational linguist. Ball and Taylor are currently collaborating on an electronic version of The Ormulum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feustle, J.A., Keyser, P.T., Ball, C.N. et al. Courseware reviews. Comput Hum 28, 199–209 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01830740

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01830740

Keywords

Navigation