Advertisement

Cancer Causes & Control

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 26–30 | Cite as

Gender of the first offspring, age at diagnosis, and survival with breast cancer (Utah, United States)

  • Dwight T. Janerich
  • Geraldine P. Mineau
  • Richard A. Kerber
Research Papers

Abstract

We examined the relationship between the survival of women with breast cancer and the gender of their first children using a genealogy-based survival analysis. The study group consisted of 2,155 parous women diagnosed in Utah (United States) with first primary breast cancers (excludingin situ tumors). We calculated hazard rate ratios (HRR) which were adjusted for stage, median survival times, and proportions surviving for three-, five-, and 10-year intervals stratified by age at diagnosis. Median survival among women diagnosed under the age of 45 was 171 months if the first child was female, but only 66 months if the first child was male (HRR=1.66, 95 percent confidence interval=1.07–2.57, for male children). For women diagnosed at age 45 or older, all survival times were similar, although women whose first child was male had slightly longer median survival time. These findings suggest that the gender of the first child has a strong influence on survival among women diagnosed under 45 years of age, but not among those diagnosed later in life. Gender of the first offspring may be a useful clinical indicator of prognosis and survival and may provide insights into etiologic and promotional factors for breast cancer.Cancer Causes and Control 1994, 5, 26–30.

Key words

Breast cancer first birth gender of child survival United States 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Janerich DT, Hoff MB. Evidence for a crossover in breast cancer risk factors.Am J Epidemiol 1982;116: 737–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Janerich DT. The influence of pregnancy on breast cancer risk: is it endocrinological or immunological?Med Hypothesis 1980;6: 1149–55.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ron E, Lubin F, Wax Y. Evidence for a crossover in breast cancer risk factors.Am J Epidemiol 1984;119: 139–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pathak DR, Speizer FE, Willett WC, Rosner B, Lipnick RJ. Parity and breast cancer risk: possible effect on age at diagnosis.Int J Cancer 1986;37: 21–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Negri E, La Vecchia C, Bruzzi P, Dardanoni G, Decarli A, Palli D. Risk factors for breast cancer: pooled results from three Italian case-control studies.Am J Epidemiol 1988;128: 1207–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Layde PM, Webster LA, Baughman AL, Wingo PA, Rubin GL, Ory HW. The independent associations of parity, age at first full term pregnancy, and duration of breastfeeding with the risk of breast cancer.J Clin Epidemiol 1989;42: 963–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adami HO, Bergstrom R, Lund E, Meirik O. Absence of association between reproductive variables and the risk of breast cancer in young women in Sweden and Norway.Br J Cancer 1990;62: 122–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Juret P, Couette JE, Delozier T, Leplat G, Mandard AM, Vernhes JC. Sex of the first child as a prognostic factor in breast cancer.Lancet 1978;i: 415–6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Janerich DT, Stark AD, Glebatis DM. Sex of the first child as a prognostic factor for breast cancer in young women.Am J Epidemiol 1980;111: 297–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elwood JM, Coleman AJ. Breast cancer prognosis and the sex of the patient's children.Cancer 1981;47: 985–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Skolnick M. The Utah genealogical database: a resource for genetic epidemiology. In: Cairns J, Lyons JL, Skolnick M, eds.Banbury Report 4; Cancer Incidence in Defined Populations. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1980: 285–96.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations.J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53: 457–81.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller BA, Ries LAG, Hankey BF, Kosary CL, Edwards BK.Cancer Statistics Review 1973–1989 Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1992; NIH Pub. No. 92-2789, IV.9.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tarone RE, Chu KC. Implications of birth cohort patterns in interpreting trends in breast cancer rates.JNCI 1992;84: 1402–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Polednak AP, Janerich DT. Characteristics of first pregnancy in relation to early breast cancer: a case-control study.J Reprod Med 1983;28(5): 314–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cole P, MacMahon B. Estrogen fractions during early reproductive life in the etiology of breast cancer.Lancet 1969;i: 604–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rapid Communications of Oxford Ltd 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dwight T. Janerich
    • 1
  • Geraldine P. Mineau
    • 2
  • Richard A. Kerber
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Utah School of Medicine at the Utab Cancer CenterUSA
  2. 2.the Department of SociologyUSA
  3. 3.the Department of Family and Preventive MedicineUSA

Personalised recommendations