Abstract
Recent articles have noted that humanities computing techniques and methodologies remain marginal to mainstream literary scholarship. Mark Olsen's paper discusses this phenomenon and argues for large scale analyses of text databases that would incorporate a shift in theoretical orientation to include greater stress on intertextuality and sign theory. Part of Olsen's argument revolves on the need to move away from the syntactic and overt grammatical elements of textual language to more subtle semantics and meaning systems. While provocative and important, Olsen's stance remains rooted in literary theoretical constructs. Another level of language, the cognitive, offers equally interesting challenges for humanities computing, though the paradigms for this type of computer-based exploration are derived from disciplines traditionally removed from the humanities. The riddle, a nearly universal genre, offers a window onto some of the cognitive processes involved in deep level language function. By analyzing the riddling process, different methods of computational modelling can be inferred, suggesting new avenues for computing in the humanities.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, Janet. “The Role of Prototypes in Understanding Category Concepts: A Critical Assessment.” Paper Presented at the Society for Philosophy and Psychology, June 1991.
Bolton, Whitney. “Opinion.”Computers and the Humanities, 25, 6 (1991), 431–32.
Bryant, Mark.Dictionary of Riddles. London, New York: Routledge, 1990.
Burger, Wilhelm and Bir Bhanu. “Reasoning about Motion and Scene Structure for Visual Navigation.” InCybernetics and Systems Research '92. Hong Kong: World Scientific Press, 1992, pp. 1431–38.
Edelman, Gerald.The Remembered Present. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.
Frye, Northrup.Spiritus Mundi. Essays on Literature, Myth, and Society. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1977.
Glanville, Ranulph. “The Self and the Other: the Purpose of Distinction.”Cybernetics and Systems '90. Hong Kong: World Scientific Press, 1990, pp. 349–56.
Graefe, V. “Robot Vision Based on Coarsely Grained Multi-Processor Systems.” InProceedings, IMACS World Congress. Eds. R. Vichenevsky and J. Miller. 1991, pp. 755–56.
Henry, Charles. “The Image of a Word.” InHumanities and the Computer: New Directions. Ed. D. Miall. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
Henry, Charles. “Non-Literal Language and Knowledge Structuring.” InCybernetics and Systems '92. Hong Kong: World Scientific Press, 1992, pp. 691–98.
Klir, George and T. Folger.Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty, and Information. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1988.
Lakoff, George.Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
Mac Cormac, Earl. “Metaphors and Fuzzy Sets.”Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 7 (1982), 243–56.
Mac Cormac, Earl.A Cognitive Theory of Metaphor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1985.
Neisser, U., ed.Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Olsen, Mark. “Signs, Symbols, and Discourses: A New Direction for Computer-aided Literature Studies.” See this issue.
Pask, Gordon.Conversation, Cognition, and Learning. Amsterdam and New York: Elsevier, 1975.
Pattee, H.H. “The Measurement Problem in Artificial World Problems.”Biosystems, 23 (1989), 281–90.
Paivio, Allan.Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, 1971.
Potter, Rosanne. “Statistical Analysis of Literature: A Retrospective ofComputers and the Humanities, 1966–1990.”Computers and the Humanities, 25, 6 (1991), 401–29.
Raben, Joseph. “Humanities Computing 25 Years Later.”Computers and the Humanities, 25, 6 (1991), 341–50.
Rocha, Luis. “Fuzzification of Conversation Theory.” Paper Presented at the Principia Cybernetica Conference, Free University, Brussels, July 1991.
Rosch, Eleanor. “Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories.”Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104 (1975), 192–233.
Rosch, Eleanor and Barbara Lloyd, eds.Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978.
Roth, E. and E. Shoben. “The Effects of Context on the Structure of Categories.”Cognitive Psychology, 15 (1983), 346–78.
Scott, C. “On Defining the Riddle: The Problem of a Structural Unit.”Genre, 2 (1969), 129–42.
Williamson, C.The Old English Riddles of the Exeter Book. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1977.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Charles Henry has a Ph.D. in Comparative Literature and is presently the Director of Libraries at Vassar College. His research includes non-literal aspects of language, and the cognitive processes involved in understanding symbolic language. Recent articles include “The Image of Word,”in Humanities and the Computer: New Directions, ed. D. Miall (Oxford, 1990), and “Non-Literal Aspects of Language and Knowledge Structuring,” inCybernetics and Systems Research '92, ed. R. Trappl (World Scientific Press, 1992).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Henry, C. The surface of language and humanities computing. Comput Hum 27, 315–322 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01829381
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01829381