Advertisement

Infection

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 116–119 | Cite as

Bacterial adherence to urothelium following bladder irrigation in the rat

  • P. Iversen
  • P. O. Madsen
Article

Summary

We investigated the effects of bladder irrigation with various irrigation fluids at various temperatures and irrigation pressures on the adherence of3H-labeledEscherichia coli O6 to bladder urothelium in a rat model. Sixty-four control and 108 experimental animals were studied. The latter were divided into five groups according to type of irrigation fluid (glycine 1.5%, sorbitol 2.7%, mannitol 0.54%, and H2O), fluid temperature, and intravesical pressure during irrigation. Only rats undergoing high pressure (60 cm H2O) bladder irrigation demonstrated significant increases in bacterial adherence compared to controls. No differences were found with the different irrigation fluids. This study suggests that high intravesical pressure during transurethral surgery might enhance bacterial adherence to urothelium and thereby increase the risk of manifest infection in the postoperative course.

Keywords

Glycin Mannitol Family Medicine Sorbitol Fluid Temperature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Adhärenz von Bakterien an Urothel nach Blasenspülung bei der Ratte

Zusammenfassung

In einem Rattenmodell wurde der Einfluß der Blasenspülung mit verschiedenen Spülflüssigkeiten bei unterschiedlichen Temperaturen und Spüldrucken auf die Haftfähigkeit von3H-markiertenEscherichia coli O6 Urothel der Blase untersucht. Die Studie wurde an 64 Kontrolltieren und 108 behandelten Tieren durchgeführt. In der experimentellen Gruppe erfolgte eine Unterteilung in fünf Untergruppen entsprechend der Art der Spülflüssigkeit (1,5%iges Glycin, 2,7%iges Sorbit, 0,54%iges Mannit und H2O), Temperatur der Flüssigkeit und intravesikalem Druck während der Spülung. Nur bei Ratten, die einer Blasenspülung unter hohem Druck (60 cm H2O) ausgesetzt waren, zeigte sich ein signifikanter Anstieg in der bakteriellen Adhärenz im Vergleich zu den Kontrolltieren. Die verschiedenen Spülflüssigkeiten führten zu keinen Unterschieden in der Adhärenz. Aus den Ergebnissen der Studie kann angenommen werden, daß hohe intravesikale Drucke während transurethraler chirurgischer Eingriffe die Haftfähigkeit von Bakterien am Urothel verstärken und dadurch das Risiko einer manifesten Infektion in der postoperativen Phase verstärken.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. 1.
    Chodak, G. W., Plaut, M. E. Systemic antibiotics for prophylaxis in urologic surgery: A critical review. J. Urol. 121 (1979) 695–699.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Genster, H. G., Madsen, P. O. Urinary tract infections following transurethral prostatectomy. With special reference to the use of antimicrobials. J. Urol. 104 (1970) 163–168.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Appell, R. A., Flynn, J. T., Paris, A. M. I., Blandy, J. P. Occult bacterial colonization of bladder tumors. J. Urol. 124 (1980) 345–346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morris, M. F., Golovsky, D., Guinnes, M. D. G., Maher, P. O. The value of prophylactic antibiotics in transurethral prostatic resection: A controlled trial, with observations on the origin of postoperative infection. Br. J. Urol. 48 (1976) 479–486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brehmer, B., Madsen, P. O. Route and prophylaxis of ascending bladder infection in the male patients with indwelling catheters. J. Urol. 108 (1972) 719–721.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bagley, D. H., Herlihy, E., McGuire, E. J. Infections and antibiotic prophylaxis in the fulgurated rat bladder. Invest. Urol. 17 (1980) 277–283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Madsen, P. O., Kuni, H., Naber, K. G. Various methods of determining irrigating fluid absorption during transurethral resection of the prostate. Theoretical and practical considerations. Urol. Res. 1 (1973) 70–78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Madsen, P. O., Naber, K. G. Absorption and excretion of sorbitol and mannitol in transurethral resection of the prostate. Invest. Urol. 2 (1974) 331–335.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parsons, C. L., Greenspan, C., Moore, S. W., Mulholland, S. G. Role of surface mucin in primary antibacterial defense of bladder. Urology 9 (1977) 48–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Uehling, D. T., Mizutani, K., Balish, E. Inhibitors of bacterial adherence to urothelium. Invest. Urol. 18 (1980) 40–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jensen, J., Balish, E., Mizutani, K., Uehling, D. T.: Resolution of induced urinary tract infection: An animal model to assess bladder immunization. J. Urol. (in print).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frimodt-Moeller, N., Maigaard, S., Madsen, P. O. Effect of urine concentration versus tissue concentration of ampicillin and mecillinam on bacterial adherence in the rat bladder. Invest. Urol. 18 (1981) 322–325.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schaeffer, A. J., Amundsen, S. K., Schmidt, L. N. Adherence ofEscherichia coli to human urinary tract epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 24 (1979) 753–759.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Svanborg Edén, C., Eriksson, B., Hanson, L. Å. Adhesion ofEscherichia coli to human urothelial cellsin vitro. Infect. Immun. 18 (1977) 767–774.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Uehling, D. T., Mizutani, K., Balish, E. Effect of immunization of bacterial adherence to urothelium. Invest. Urol. 16 (1978) 145–147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shrom, S. H., Parsons, C. L., Fritz, R. W., Mulholland, S. G. Effect of bacterial metabolic state on vesical mucosal adherence. Invest. Urol. 18 (1980) 77–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zawaneh, S. M., Ayoub, E. M., Baer, H., Cruz, A. C., Spellacy, W. N. Factors influencing adherence of group B streptococci to human vaginal epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 26 (1979) 441–447.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parsons, C. L., Mulholland, S. G., Anwar, H. Antibacterial activity of bladder surface mucin duplicated by exogenous glycosaminoglycan (heparin). Infect. Innum. 24 (1979) 552–557.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MMW Medizin Verlag München GmBH 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Iversen
    • 1
  • P. O. Madsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Urology Section, William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital and Department of SurgeryUniversity of Wisconsin School of MedicineMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations