Skip to main content
Log in

Multidimensional system identification through blind deconvolution

  • Published:
Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

By invoking characteristics of the recently introduced zero-sheet of the spectrum of a signal having finite (or compact) support, it is noted that the multidimensional system identification problem should be solvable through blind deconvolution, that is, the system response function should be inferrable in the absence of prior knowledge of the signal which excites the system. It is pointed out that practical blind deconvolution can only be effected iteratively at present. An iterative blind identification algorithm is described and is illustrated by recovery of images from blurred versions contaminated with noise of varying levels. Successful blind deconvolution is achieved without invoking prior knowledge of either the forms or the supports of either the original images or the point spread functions, which respectively correspond to exciting signals and response functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ayers, G.R. and Dainty, J.C. 1988. An iterative blind deconvolution algorithm and its applications.Optics Letters, 13, 547–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R.H.T. and Davey, B.L.K. 1989. Deconvolution ancient and (very) modern. InDiffraction Limited Imaging with Very Large Telescopes, (D. Alloin & J.M. Mariotti, eds.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, R.H.T. and McDonnell, M.J. 1989.Image Restoration and Reconstruction. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Corrected and updated 2nd printing.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, B.L.K., Lane, R.G., and Bates, R.H.T. 1989. Blind deconvolution of noisy complex-valued image.Optics Communications, 69, 353–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienup, J.R. 1978. Reconstruction of an object from the modulus of its Fourier transform.Optics Letters, 3, (July) 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fienup, J.R. 1982. Phase retrieval algorithms: A comparison.Applied Optics, 21, 2758–2769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerchberg, R.W. and Saxton, W.O. 1972. A practical algorithm for the determination of phase from image and diffraction plane pictures.Optik, 35, 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagiwada, H.H. 1974.System Identification Methods and Applications. London: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R.G. and Bates, R.H.T. 1987a. Automatic multi-dimensional deconvolution.J. of the Optical Society of America A, 4, 180–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R.G. and Bates, R.H.T. 1987b. Relevance for blind deconvolution of recovering Fourier magnitude from phase.Optics Communications, 63, 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R.G., Fright, W.R., and Bates, R.H.T. 1987. Direct phase retrieval.IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, ASSP-35, 520–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., and Vetterling, W.T. 1986.Numerical Recipes. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage, A.P. and Melsa, J.L. 1971.System Identification. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, T. 1983.Instrumental Variable Methods for System Identification. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bates, R.H.T., Jiang, H. & Davey, B.L.K. Multidimensional system identification through blind deconvolution. Multidim Syst Sign Process 1, 127–142 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01816546

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01816546

Keywords

Navigation