Advertisement

Zeitschrift für Physik A Atoms and Nuclei

, Volume 285, Issue 4, pp 339–346 | Cite as

Collective effects in atoms via a schematic model

  • F. J. Kok
  • R. H. Lemmer
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Linear response theory is used to investigate the collective excitation spectra of the outer shells of heavy atoms. A model, based on the approximate separability of particle-hole interaction matrix elements, is solved in closed form and found to be in semi-quantitative agreement with experiment for the vibrations of the 4d shell in Xenon. The separability of these matrix elements in the relevant energy region is shown to be due to a general property of wave functions of atomic potentials. A comparison is also made with full random phase approximation calculations for Xe. It is shown that the schematic model contains all the relevant features to describe the enhanced photo-absorption of this system in the far ultraviolet. The role of anf-wave resonance in the average atomic field is stressed in connection with this enhancement. Detailed agreement between the schematic model and experiment is less good than that obtained from the full random phase calculation, the differences arising due to an approximate treatment of exchange in the former calculation. The total dipole strength in the photo-electric region is approximately the same for both calculations however and in reasonable accord with experiment.

Keywords

Schematic Model Random Phase Approximation Collective Excitation Linear Response Theory Atomic Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Haensel, R., Keitel, G., Schreiber, P., Kunz, C.: Phys. Rev.188, 1375 (1969)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    El-Sherbini, Th.M., Van der Wiel, W.J.: Physica62, 119 (1972)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Connerade, J.P., Mansfield, M.W.D.: Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A341, 267 (1974)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wendin, G.: J. Phys. B.6, 42 (1973)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amus'ya, M.Ya., Ivanov, V.K., Cherepkov, N.A., Chernyshova, L.V.: Sov. Phys. JETP39, 752 (1974)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wendin, G.: Phys. Lett.51 A, 291 (1975)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, G.E.: Unified Theory of Nuclear Models and Forces, 2nd ed., Amsterdam: North-Holland 1967Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fano, U.: Phys. Rev.124, 1866 (1961)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cooper, J.W.: Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 762 (1964)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Griffin, D.C., Andrew, K.L.: Phys. Rev.177, 62 (1969)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    See for example Fetter, A.L., Walecka, J.D.: Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill 1971Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dover, C.B., Lemmer, R.H., Hahne, F.J.W.: Ann. Phys.70, 458 (1972)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Edmonds, A.R.: Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Princeton: Princeton University Press 1960Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Slater, J.C.: Quantum Theory of Matter, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill 1968Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Froese-Fischer, C.: Some Hartree-Fock Results for the atoms Helium to Radon (Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, 1968)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bethe, H.A., Salpeter, E.E.: Quantum Mechanics of one- and two-electron Atoms. Berlin-Göttingen-Heidelberg: Springer 1957Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pines, D., Nozières, P.: The Theory of Quantum Liquids. New York: W.A. Benjamin 1966Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    See for example Spicer, B.M.: Advances in Physics2, 1 (1969)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. J. Kok
    • 1
  • R. H. Lemmer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaRepublic of South Africa
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgRepublic of South Africa

Personalised recommendations