Advertisement

Sorting and blending of “unit characters” in the zygote of Oenothera with twin and triplet hybrids in the first generation

Source and characters of the parent species.
  • Geo F. Atkinson
Abhandlungen

Keywords

Unit Character 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. Atkinson, Geo. F., 1913: Is the biennial habit of Oenothera races constant in their native localities? Sci. N. S.37, 716, 717, 1913.Google Scholar
  2. —, 1914: Segregation of characters in first generation hybrids from stable species of Oenothera. Sci. N. S.39, 256, 1914 (idem. 3, 4, in separate for Bot. Soc. Am.)Google Scholar
  3. —, 1914: Segregation of “unit characters” in the zygote of Oenothera with twin and triplet hybrids in the first generation. Sci. N. S.39, 834, 835, 1914.Google Scholar
  4. Bartlett, H. H., 1913: Systematic studies on Oenothera, III, New species from Ithaca. N. Y. Rhodora15, 81–85, 1913.Google Scholar
  5. Blaringhem, L., 1913: Sur l'hérédité en mosaic. C. R. et Rapp. IVe Conference internationale de génétique (Paris 1911), 101–131, text figs. 1–19, 1913.Google Scholar
  6. Cannon, W. A., 1903: Studies in plant hybrids: The spermatogenesis of hybrid cotton. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club30, 133–172, pls. 7, 8, 1903.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, B. M., 1910: Genetical studies on Oenothera I. Notes on the behavior o, certain hybrids of Oenothera in the first generation. Am. Nat.44, 108–115, 1910.Google Scholar
  8. Ferguson, Margaret C., 1901: The development of the egg and fertilization in Pinus strobus. Ann. Bot.15, 435–479, pls. 23–25, 1901.Google Scholar
  9. —, 1904: Contributions to the knowledge of the life history of Pinus with special reference to sporogenesis, the development of the gametophytes and fertilization. Proc. Washington Acad. Sci.6, 1–202, pls. 1–24, 1904.Google Scholar
  10. Focke, W. O., 1881: Die Pflanzenmischlinge. Ein Beitrag zur Biologie der Gewächse. 1881.Google Scholar
  11. Gates, R. R., 1913: A new Oenothera. Rhodora15, 45–48, pls. 100, 101, 1913.Google Scholar
  12. —, and Thomas, N., 1914: A cytological study of Oenothera mut. lata and Oe. mut. semilata in relation to mutation. Quar. Jour. Micr. Sci.59, 523–571, text fig. 1–4, 1914.Google Scholar
  13. Guignard, L., 1890: Études sur les phénomènes morphologiques de la fécondation. Bull. Soc. Bot. France36, C-CXLVI, pls. 3–5, (1888) 1890.Google Scholar
  14. Juel, H. O., 1900: Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Tetradenteilung. Jahrb. f. wiss. Bot.35, 626–659, pls. 15, 16, 1900.Google Scholar
  15. Lodewyks, J, A., 1908: Vegetative vermenigvuldigung van Oenothera's. Diss. Amsterdam, 1908.Google Scholar
  16. Metcalf, H., 1901: Proc. Nebr. Acad. Sci.7, 109, 1901.Google Scholar
  17. Rosenberg, O., 1903: Das Verhalten der Chromosomen in einer hybriden Pflanze. Ber. deutsch. Bot. Ges.21, 111–117, pl. 7, 1903.Google Scholar
  18. —, 1904: Über die Tetradenteilung eines Drosera-Bastardes. Ber. deutsch. bot. Ges.22, 47–51, pl. 4, 1904.Google Scholar
  19. —, 1909: Cytologische und morphologische Studien an Drosera longifolia × rotundifolia. Kungl. Sven. Vet.-Akad. Handl.43, 1–64, text figs. 1–33, pls. 1–4, 1909.Google Scholar
  20. Strasburger, E., 1904: Über Reduktionsteilung. Sitzungsb. Akad. Wiss. Berlin1914, 587–615, text figs. 1–9, 1904.Google Scholar
  21. Strasburger, E., 1904: Histologische Beiträge zur Vererbungsfrage I. Typische und allotypische Kernteilung. Jahrb. f. wiss. Bot.42, 1–71, pl. 1, 1904.Google Scholar
  22. —, 1908: Chromosomenzahlen, Plasmastrukturen, Vererbungsträger und Reduktionsteilung. Jahrb. f. wiss. Bot.45, 479–570, pls. 1–3, 1908.Google Scholar
  23. —, 1909: Zeitpunkt der Bestimmung des Geschlechts, Apogamie, Parthenogenesis und Reduktionsteilung. Hist. Beitr.7, I-XVI, 1–123, pls. 1–3, 1909.Google Scholar
  24. Swingle, W. T., 1898: Some theories of heredity and the origin of species considered in relation to the phenomena of hybridization. Bot. Gaz.25, 111–113, 1898.Google Scholar
  25. - 1913: Variation in first generation hybrids (imperfect dominance): its possible explanation through zygotaxis. C. R. et Rapp. IVe Conférence internationale de génétique. Paris, 1911. 381–394, text figs. 1–10, 1913.Google Scholar
  26. de Vries, H. 1903. Die Mutations-Theorie,2, 1903.Google Scholar
  27. — 1907: Twin hybrids. Bot. Gaz.44, 401–407, 1907.Google Scholar
  28. — 1908: Über die Zwillingsbastarde von Oenothera nanella. Ber. deutsch. Bot. Ges.26A, 667–676, 1908.Google Scholar
  29. — 1909: On triple hybrids, Bot. Gaz.47, 1–8, 1909.Google Scholar
  30. — 1911: Über doppeltreziproke Bastarde von Oenothera biennis L. und O. muricata L. Biol. Centralbl.31, 97–104, 1911.Google Scholar
  31. - 1913: Gruppenweise Artbildung, unter spezieller Berücksichtigung der Gattung Oenothera. Berlin, 1913.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1916

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geo F. Atkinson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Botany, College of Arts and SciencesCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations