Der Züchter

, Volume 4, Issue 5, pp 122–135 | Cite as


  • R. Schick


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Adams, J.: The effect of certain plants of altering the daily period of light. Ann. Bot.37, 75–94 (1923).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adams, J.: Duration of light and growth. Ann. Bot.38, 509–524 (1924).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams, J.: The effect on tomato, soy beans and other plants of altering the daily period of light. Amer. J. Bot.11, 229–232 (1924).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adams, J.: Does light determine the date of heading out in winter wheat and winter rye. Amer. J. Bot.11, 535–539 (1924).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adams, J.: Some further experiments on the relation of light to growth. Amer. J. Bot.12, 398 bis 412 (1925).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Auchter, E., andC. P. Harley: Effect of various length of day on development of some horticulture plants. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc. Report1924, 199.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berkley, E. E.: Studies of the effects of differents lengths of daywith variations in temperature on vegetativ growth and reproduktion in cotton. Ann. Missouri Bot. Garden18, 573–604 (1931).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bremer, A. H.: Cabbage lettuce in frames and open ground. Meld. Norges Landbr.9, 1 (1929).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bremer, A. H.: Einfluß der Tageslänge auf die Wachstumsphasen des Salats. Genetische Untersuchungen I. Gartenbauwiss.4, 469–483 (1931).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davies, J. G.: On a method of cross-pollinating late and early Cocksfoot Welsh Plant Breeding Station Rec. 1926 unveröffentlicht.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deats, M. E.: The effect on plants of the increase and decrease of the period of illumination over that of the normal day period. Amer. J. Bot.12, 384–392 (1925).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doroshenko, A.: Photoperiodisme of some cultivated forms in connection with their origin. Bull. Appl. Bot.17, 167–220 (1927).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doroshenko, A., andV. I. Rasumov: Photoperiodisme of some cultivated forms in connection with their origin II. Bull. Appl. Bot.22, 219–276 (1929).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Doroshenko, A., H. D. Carpetschenko andH. I. Nesterov: Influence of the length of day on the tuber set of potatoes and several other plants. Bull. Appl. Bot.23, 31–60 (1929/30).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eaton, E. M.: Assimilation-respiration balance as related to length of day reactions of soy beans. Bot. Gaz.77, 311–321 (1924).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eaton, S. V.: Effects of variation in day length and clipping of plants on nodule development and growth of soy beans. Bot. Gaz.91, 113–143 (1930).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Emerson, R. A.: Control of flowering in Teosinte. J. Hered.15, 41 (1924).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garner, W., andH. A. Allard: Effect of the relative length of day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduktion on plants. J. agricult. Res.18, 553–606. (1920).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Garner, W., andH. A. Allard: Flowering and fruiting of plants controlled by length of day. Yb. U. S. Dep. Agricult.1920, 852.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garner, W., andH. A. Allard: Effect of light on plants. Ann. Rep. Smithsonian Inst.1920, 569.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garner, W., andH. A. Allard: Further studies in photoperiodisme, the response of the plant to relative length of day and night. J. agricult. Res.23, 871–920 (1923).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Garner, W., andH. A. Allard: Localization of the response in plants to relative length of day and night. J. agricult. Res.31, 555 (1925).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Garner, W., andH. A. Allard: Effect of short alternating periods of light and darkness on plant growth. Science N. S.66, 40–42 (1927).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Garner, W., andH. A. Allard: Photoperiodic Response of soy beans in relation to temperatur and other environmental factors.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Garner, W., andH. A. Allard: Effect of abnormely long and short alternations of light and darknes on growth and development of plants. J. agricult. Res.42, 629–651 (1931).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Garner, W., andH. A. Allard: Duration of the flowerless condition of some plants in response to unfavorable length of day. J. agricult. Res.41, 439–444 (1931).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Garner, W., C. W. Bacon andH. A. Allard: Photoperiodisme in relation to hydrogenionconcentration of the cell sap and the carbohydrate content of the plant. J. agricult. Res.27, 119–156 (1924).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gilbert, B. E.: Interrelation of relative day length and temperatur. Bot. Gaz.81, 1–24 (1926).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gilbert, B. E.: The response of certain photoperiodic plants to differing temperatures and humidity conditions. Ann. Bot.1926, 315.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Harvey, R. B.: Growth of plants in artificial light. Bot. Gaz.74, 447 (1922).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hendricks, E., andR. B. Harvey: The growth of plants in artificial light. Bot. Gaz.77, 330 (1924).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hiorth, G.: Die Anwendung elektrischer Beleuchtung für Vererbungsversuche mit Pflanzen. Züchter1, 204–209 (1929).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Johansson, N.: Einige Versuche über die Einwirkung verschiedener Belichtung auf die vegetative Entwicklung vonRaphanus sativus. Flora121, 222–235 (1927).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kellermann, K. F.: A review of the discovery of photoperiodisme: The influence of length of daily light periods upon the growth of plants. Quart. Rev. Biol.1, 87 (1926).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kjellmann, F. K.: Aus dem Leben der Polarpflanzen. In „Studien und Forschungen” von Nordenskiöld. Leipzig 1885.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Klebs, G.: Fortpflanzung der Gewächse. Handw. Nat.4, 276–296 (1913).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Klebs, G.: Über die Blütenbildung von Sempervivum. Flora111/112, 128–151 (1918).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Knott, G. E.: Further Localization of the response in plant tissues to relative length of day and night. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. Proc.23, 67 (1926).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Koltzoff, L. J.: Influence de la durée d'eclairment sur la croissance et le developpment des plantes. Bull. Inst. Agr. Exp.1923, 139–142.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kraus, E. J., andH. R. Kraybill: Vegetation and reproduktion with special reference to the tomato. Oregon Agr. Exp. Stat. Bull.149.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Loew, O.: Was gibt den Anstoß zur Blütenbildung. Fortschr. Landw.2, 105–106 (1927).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lubimenko, V., etO. Stcheglova: Sur l'adaption photoperiodic chez les plantes vertes. J. Soc. Bot. Russie12, 113–162 (1927).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lubimenko, V., etO. Stcheglova: L'adaption photoperiodic des plantes. Rev. gén. Bot.40, 513–536, 577–590, 675–689, 747–768 (1928).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Maximov, N. A.: Importance du rapport entre la durée du jour et de la nuit pour la vie de la plante (photoperiodisme). Trav. Bot. appl. select.14, 71–90 (1925).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Maximov, N. A.: Experimentelle Änderungen der Länge der Vegetationsperiode bei den Pflanzen. Biol. Zbl.49, 513–543 (1929).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    McClelland, T. B.: The photoperiodisme of Thephrosia candida. J. agricult. Res.28, 495–560 (1924).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    McClelland, T. B.: Studies of the photoperiodisme of some economic plants. J. agricult. Res.37, 603–628 (1928).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    McPhee, H. C.: The influence of environment on sex in hemp,Cannabis sativa L. J. agricult. Res.28, 1067–1080 (1924).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mochkov, B.: Der Photoperiodismus einiger Baumarten. Bull. Appl. Bot.23, 479–510 (1930).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nightingale, G. T.: Light in relation to the growth and chemical composition of some horticultural plants. Proc. amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.1922, 18–29.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Oakley, R. A., andH. L. Westover: Effect of length of day on Seedlings of Alfalfa varieties and the possibility of utilizing this as a practical means of identification. J. agricult. Res.21, 599–607 (1921).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Pfeiffer, N. E.: Microchemical and morphological studies of effect of light on plants. Bot. Gaz.81, 173–195 (1926).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pieters, A. J.: Differences in internode length between, and effect of variations in light duration upon seedlings of annual and biennial white sweet clover. J. agricult. Res.31, 585 (1925).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Rasumov, V. J.: Über die photoperiodische Nachwirkung im Zusammenhang mit der Wirkung verschiedener Aussaattermine auf die Pflanzen. Planta10, 345–373 (1930) und Bull. Appl. Bot.23, 61–109 (1930).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Roberts, R. H.: Relation of composition to the growth and fruitfulness of young apples as affected by seedling shading and photoperiod. Plant. Phys.2, 237 (1927).Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Schaffner, I. H.: The influence of relative length of daylight on the reversal of sex in hemp. Ecology4, 322–334 (1923).Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Schaffner, I. H.: Sex reversal in the japanese hop. Bull. Torrey bot. Club1923, 73–79.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schaffner, I. H.: The change of opposite to alternative Phyllotaxy and repeated rejuvenations in hemp by means of changed photoperiodicity. Ecologie7, 315–325 (1926).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Schaffner, I. H.: Control of sex reversal in the tassel of indian corn. Bot. Gaz.84, 440 (1928).Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Schick, R.: Über den Einfluß der Tageslänge auf den Knollenansatz der Kartoffel. Züchter3, 365–369 (1931).Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Tinker, M. A. H.: Effect of length of day on flowering and growth. Nature114, 350–351 (1924).Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tinker, M. A. H.: Effect of length of day upon the growth and reproduktion of some economic plants. Ann. Bot.39, 720–755 (1925).Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Tinker, M. A. H.: The effect of length of day upon the growth and internal composition of some economic plants. Rep. Brit. Ass. Adv. Sci. (Oxford)1926, 412.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tinker, M. A. H.: The effect of length of day upon the growth and chemical composition of the tissues of certain economic plants. Ann. Bot.42, 101 (1928).Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Tinker, M. A. H.: On the effekt of length of daily period of illumination upon the growth of plants. J. roy. Hort. Soc.54, 354–378 (1929).Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Tjebbes, K., u.I. C. T. L. Uphof: Der Einfluß des elektrischen Lichtes auf das Pflanzenwachstum. Landw. Jb.56, 315–326 (1921).Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Wanser, H.: Photoperiodisme in wheat. Science56, 313–315 (1922).Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Wiesner, J.: Der Lichtgenuß der Pflanzen. Leipzig 1907.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Yoshii, Y.: On the influence of the relative length of day and night on plants. Sci. Rep. Tohoka Imp. Univ.2, Nr 2, 4. Ser.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Zimmermann, P. W., andE. Hitchcock: Root formation and flowering of dahlia cuttings when subjected to different day lengths. Bot. Gaz.87, 1–13 (1929).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Verlag von Julius Springer 1932

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Schick
    • 1
  1. 1.Kaiser-Wilhelm-Institut für ZüchtungsforschungMüncheberg i. M.

Personalised recommendations