Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Developing curriculum for canadian schools: What we learned from the atlantic salmon

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bloom, B.Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: David McKay, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carini, P. F.Observation and description: An alternative methodology for the investigation of human phenomena. North Dakota Study Group on Evaluation, 1975.

  • Eisner, E. W. (Ed).Confronting curriculum reform. Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, John I. Thought, invention and research in the advancement of education.Educational Forum, 1968,33(11).

  • Johnson, M. Definitions and models in curriculum theory.Educational Theory, 1967, 127–140.

  • MacDonald, James B. (Ed.). Educational Models for Instruction — Introduction. InTheories of Instruction. Washington: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, James B., Wolfson, Bernice J., & Zaret, Esther.Reschooling society: A conceptual model. Washington: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, N. B. A Report for the Curriculum Committee of the Council of Ministers of Education on the Study of Canada, Canadians, and Life in Canada. Council of Ministers of Education, 1971.

  • Moore, E. The way it is in curriculum development.Curriculum Theory Network, 1971, 7; Part I, 12–14; Part II, 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlitt, Malcolm, & Hamilton, David. Evaluation as illumination: A new approach to the study of innovating programs. Occasional paper 9, Centre for Research in the Educational Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 1972.

  • Saylor, J. Galen, & Alexander, William M.Planning curriculum for schools. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, Joseph J.The practical: A language for curriculum. Washington: National Education Association, Center for Study of Instruction, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, T. H. B.To know ourselves. Report of the Commission on Canadian Studies. Ottawa: Association of Universities and Colleges of Canada, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, R.Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Atlantic Institute of Education, USA

    Gary J. Anderson & Ann E. Brimer

  2. Department of Education, New Brunswick

    Muriel Cooper

Authors
  1. Gary J. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ann E. Brimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muriel Cooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, G.J., Brimer, A.E. & Cooper, M. Developing curriculum for canadian schools: What we learned from the atlantic salmon. Interchange 8, 16–31 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01810460

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01810460

Keywords

Search

Navigation