Advertisement

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 247–261 | Cite as

On the transformation of mass and momentum densities in special relativity

  • G. H. Hostetter
Article

Abstract

By considering the mass and momentum densities of a point mass moving at uniform velocity, the known transformation of these densities from a representation in one inertial system to another is easily derived. The transformation is not linear in mass and momentum density, but the introduction of a dyadic stress density tensor gives a linear relation. The transformation is shown to hold for a general continuous mass distribution in which mass and momentum are conserved, provided a specific choice is made for the stress density tensor. This result contrasts with the particle viewpoint of matter in which only the divergence of the stress density tensor need be fixed so far as the transformation is concerned. A change of functions is made which greatly simplifies the transformations. The new functions are shown to represent a conserved fluid.

Keywords

Field Theory Elementary Particle Quantum Field Theory Linear Relation Mass Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Einstein, A. (1905).Annalen der Physik,17, 891 [English translations: (1923).In The Principle of Relativity. Methuen and Co., London; also (1952). Dover, New York].Google Scholar
  2. Elliott, R. S. (1966).IEEE Spectrum,3, March, 140.Google Scholar
  3. Jammer, M. (1961).Concepts of Mass in Classical and Modern Physics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.; also (1964) Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Lindsay, R. B. (1951).Concepts and Methods of Theoretical Physics, D. Van Nostrand Co., New York; also (1969) Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Lorentz, H. A. (1927).Problems of Modern Physics. New York: Ginn and Co., New York; also (1967) Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Møller, C. (1972).The Theory of Relativity. Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar
  7. Stratton, J. A. (1941).Electromagnetic Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Zemanian, A. H. (1965).Distribution Theory and Transform Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. H. Hostetter
    • 1
  1. 1.Electrical Engineering DepartmentCalifornia State UniversityLong Beach

Personalised recommendations