Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 41, Issue 1–3, pp 87–100 | Cite as

Non-operative management of acute upper cervical injuries

  • E. L. Seljeskog
Article

Summary

The results of a closed, non-operative type of treatment in acute upper cervical injury have been reviewed, especially as they relate to the use of the halo cast or vest. The morbidity with the use of this device has been minimal and there has been no mortality. Early patient mobilization has been readily achieved and in the case of the Hangman's, Jefferson's, and odontoid fractures, stable solid bony healing has been achieved in nearly all cases. Similar results have been noted in the C-1 arch fracture, as well as the acute post-infectious subluxations of C-1/C-2. In a small number of cases involving traumatic C-1/C-2 and occipital/atlas subluxation, there has occurred a significant incidence of instability, despite adequate closed treatment. This has been likely to be due to the serious ligamentous disruption in these cases and it would appear that surgical fusion may be the preferential form of initial treatment in this group of injuries.

Keywords

Public Health Interventional Radiology Initial Treatment Preferential Form Significant Incidence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Braakman, R., Penning, L., Injuries of the cervical spine, pp. 131–137. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica. (1971).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garret, A., Perry, J., Nickel, V. L., Stabilization of the collapsing spine. J. Bone Joint Surg.43-A (1961), 474–484.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kelly, D. L., Alexander, E.,et al., Acrylic fixation of atlanto-axial dislocations. J. Neurosurg.36 (1972), 366–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kopits, S. E., Steingass, M. H., Experience with the halo-cast in small children. Surg. Cl. No. Amer.50 (1970), 935–943.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuhn, R. A., Garret, A., The halo in the management of cervical spine lesions. Orth. Rev.1 (1972), 25–27.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McLaurin, R. L., Vernal, R., Salmon, J. H., Treatment of fractures of the atlas and axis by wiring without fusion. J. Neurosurg.36 (1972), 773–780.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nickel, V. L., Perry, J.,et al., Application of the halo. Orthop. Pros. App. J.14 (1960), 31–35.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norrell, H. A., Fractures and dislocations of the spine, in Rothman, R. H., Simeone, F. A. (Eds.): The spine, pp. 552–557. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders. (1975).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schatzker, J., Rorabeck, C. H., Waddell, J. P., Fractures of the dens (odontoid process). J. Bone Joint Surg.53 B (1971), 392–405.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schneider, R. C., Livingston, K. E.,et al., “Hangman's fracture” of the cervical spine. J. Neurosurg.22 (1965), 141–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seljeskog, E. L., Chou, S. N., The spectrum of the hangman's fracture: J. Neurosurg.45 (1976), 3–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sullivan, A. W., Subluxation of the atlanto-axial joint: sequel to inflammatory processes of the neck. J. Pediat.35 (1949), 451–464.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Young, R., Thomassen, E. H., Step by step procedure for applying the halo ring. Orthoped. Rev.3 (1974), 62–64.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. L. Seljeskog
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryUniversity of Minnesota HospitalsMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations