Stainless steel wire mesh cranioplasty: Ten years' experience with 183 patients (100 followed up)
- 41 Downloads
We have executed 183 cranioplasties in order to repair cranial defects using stainless steel wire mesh over a period of a decade, using Gardner's technique with minor modifications.
The follow-up was possible in 100 patients and it ranged from 4 to 134 months, with an average of 64.1 months (5.3 years). Among these, 8 patients developed postoperative complications (8%): 7 needed cranioplasty remotion (7%) and 1 needed cranioplasty revision without remotion (1 %). The causes of morbidity were due to: infection (3%), CSF leak (1%), haematoma (1%), skin local soaking (1%), posttraumatic plastic dislodgement (2%).
Our total morbidity rate (8%) may compare with that resulting from the use of different materials such as alloplastics (6–12%), osteoplastics (until 40%) and miscellaneous (5.5%).
The group in which cranioplasty was done within six months following the first operation had our highest complication rate (18.2%).
In our experience the stainless steel wire mesh was shown to be an effective material to repair cranial defects.
KeywordsSkull reconstruction skull defect cranioplasty stainless steel
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Gardner, W. J., Closure of defects of the skull with tantalum. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.80 (1945), 303–312.Google Scholar
- 2.Hammon, W. M., Kempe, L. G., Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty: 13 years experience with 417 patients. Acta Neurochir. (Wien)25 (1971), 69–77.Google Scholar
- 5.Rish, B. L., Dillon, J. D., Meirowsky, A. M., Caveness, W. F., Mohr, J. P., Kistler, J. P., Weiss, J. H., Cranioplasty: a review of 1030 cases of penetrating head injury. Neurosurg.4 (1979), 381–385.Google Scholar
- 7.White, J. C., Late complications following cranioplasty with alloplastic plates. Ann. Surg.128 (1948), 743–755.Google Scholar