Skip to main content
Log in

Balancing the priorities of the classroom teacher with the imperatives of high stakes assessment of reading: An English perspective

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The question underpinning this paper, and the international symposium on reading assessment at the University of Nottingham which preceded it, is this: “In what ways can we learn from each other how to improve reading assessment, at the personal, classroom, local and national levels?” This paper will attempt to answer the question “How can we learn from each other?” in the following ways: first some background information on the New Paradigms in Reading Assessment (NPRA) seminar will be presented; second, an account will be offered about what has been happening in language arts assessment (the subject termed ‘English’) in the United Kingdom, which goes some way to explaining why in England there has been a particularly urgent need to learn from the experiences of other countries; third, some examples will be given of new approaches to assessment in other countries, particularly the United States, Australia, and Scotland (which has the same government, but a different education system from that in England and Wales) from which those of us in England might learn; fourth, some principles which might underpin new assessment approaches within the English system will be put forward; and finally, an indication will be given of how some of these principles are being put into practice in classrooms in England, as pilot work on an international collaborative study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almasi, J.F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders' sociocultural conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature.Reading Research Quarterly,30(3), 314–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvermann, D. & Commeyras, M. (in press). Reading assessment: Feminist perspectives on gender. In C. Harrison & T. Salinger (Eds.),International perspectives on reading assessment: Theory and practice.

  • Barrs, M., Ellis, S., Hester, H., & Thomas, A. (1994).The primary language record. London: ILEA Centre for Language in Primary Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, P. (in press). Some Australian perspectives on language and literacy assessment. In C. Harrison & T. Salinger (Eds.),International perspectives on reading assessment: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.

  • Eagleton, T. (1983).Literary theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Department of Western Australia. (1994).First steps. Melbourne, Australia: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, B. (in press). Using direct evidence to assess student progress. In C. Harrison & T. Salinger (Eds.),International perspectives on reading assessment: Theory and practice.

  • Freedman, S.W. (1994). High stakes exams.Educator,8(2), Fall, 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. (n.d.).Developing literacy profiles. Coburg, Australia: Assessment Research Centre, Philip Institute of Technology.

  • Hamlin, M. (in press). Assessing the reading of students aged 14–16: A dual perspective. In R. Jenkins & M. Coles (Eds.),International perspectives on reading assessment: Changing practice in classrooms.

  • Hansen, J. (1994). Literacy portfolios: Window on potential. In S.W. Valencia, E.H. Hiebert, & P.P. Afflerbach (Eds.),Authentic reading assessment: Practices and possibilities (pp. 26–40). Newark DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, C., Bailey, M.C., & Dewar, A. (in press). Responsive reading assessment: is ‘postmodern’ assessment of reading possible? In C. Harrison & T. Salinger (Eds.),International perspectives on reading assessment: Theory and practice.

  • Hartman, D. K. (1995). Eight readers reading: The intertextual links of proficient readers reading multiple passages. Reading Research Quarterly,30(3), 520–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, L. & Spencer, E. (in press). Diagnostic procedures in reading: Taking a closer look — A Scottish perspective on an international issue. In C. Harrison & T. Salinger (Eds.),International perspectives on reading assessment: Theory and practice.

  • Johnson, P. (1994). Assessment as social practice. In D.J. Leu & C.K. Kinzer (Eds.)Examining critical issues in literacy research: Theory and practice (pp. 11–23). Chicago IL: National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A Report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottinghamshire County Council Advisory and Inspection Services Division. (1994).Developing children's skills in review, self assessment and target-setting. Nottingham, UK: Nottinghamshire County Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nottinghamshire County Council Advisory and Inspection Services Division. (1995).Recording achievement in Nottinghamshire primary schools. Nottingham, UK: Educational Publications Group, Resources Division, Nottinghamshire County Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • North Dakota Department of Public Instruction. (1994).North Dakota English language arts curriculum frameworks: Standards and benchmarks. Bismarck, ND: North Dakota Department of Public Instruction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddock, G., Brooks, G., Harris, D., Salt, S., Putman, K., & Schagen, I. (1995).Evaluation of national curriculum assessment in English and technology at key stage 3: 1993. Slough, Berkshire: National Foundation for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. (1994). From the child's point of view: Assessing the complexity of student learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, R.J. (1994).Dissention, tensions, and the models of literacy. Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (4th ed.). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valencia, S.W., Hiebert, E.H., & Afflerbach, P.P. (Eds.). (1994).Authentic reading assessment: Practices and possibilities. Newark DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Harrison, C. Balancing the priorities of the classroom teacher with the imperatives of high stakes assessment of reading: An English perspective. Interchange 27, 349–360 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807412

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807412

Keywords

Navigation