Skip to main content
Log in

Artifacts of change: An archaeology of school-based educational reform

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last decade, there has been a renewed interest in school-based reform in the United States. At the center of this emerging discourse lies the question, what are reform-minded schools actually doing to alter the education found in their buildings? This paper represents an effort to contribute to these descriptive analyses of school-based reform projects. However, rather than ethnography, this paper draws upon the field of archeology to understand the substance of recent school-based efforts in the United States. In particular, it identifies and discusses several artifacts that are used as heuristic devices to understand the nature of school-based reform projects. First, the paper briefly explores the use of archeology as a means to understand school-based reform efforts. Next, it illuminates the nature of these efforts by examining various artifacts that have emerged from several of these projects. Finally, based upon illustrations, it examines the basic nature of these recent school-based efforts and the usefulness of archeology for understanding what is happening in these schools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apple, M. (1986).Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1990a). What reform talk does: Creating new inequalities in education. In S. Bacharach (Ed.),Education reform: Making sense of it all (pp. 155–164). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1990b). The politics of official knowledge in the United States.Journal of Curriculum Studies,22(4), 377–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1993).Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. & Beane, J. (1994).Democratic schools. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronowitz, S. & Giroux, H. (1988). Schooling, culture, and literacy in the age of broken dreams: A review of Bloom and Hirsch.Harvard Educational Review,58(2), 172–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S. (1990).Education reform: Making sense of it all. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, S. (1993).Battleground: One mother's crusade, the religious right, and the struggle for control of our classrooms. New York: Poseidon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett. W. (1984, November 28). To reclaim a legacy: Text of report on humanities in higher education.Chronicle of Higher Education, 16–21.

  • Binford, L. (1978).Nunamiut ethnoarchaeology. Orlando FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bintz, W. (1995).Creating curriculum in the classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, A. (1987).The Closing of the American mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondy, E. (in press). Fredericks middle school and the dynamics of school reform. In A. Lieberman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.),The work of restructuring schools.

  • Brennan, L. (1973).Beginner's guide to archaeology: The modern digger's step-by-step introduction to the expert ways of unearthing the past. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagan, E. (1978). Individualism, collectivism, and radical educational reform.Harvard Educational Review 48(2), 227–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, L. & Canter, M. (1976).Assertive discipline: A take charge approach for today's educator. Seal Beach, CA: Canter & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. (1982). “Updating” individualism and the work ethic: Corporate logic in the classroom.Curriculum Inquiry,12(2), 125–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1984).How teachers taught. New York: Longman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1990). A fundamental puzzle of school reform. In A. Lieberman (Ed.),Schools as collaborative cultures: Creating the future now. New York: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, C. (1990). A principal's view: Giving up my traditional ship: Personal reflections of shared decision-making.School Administrator,47(8), 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hamond, L. (1985). Valuing teachers: The making of a profession.Teachers College Record,87(2), 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. & Stone, J. (1985).Treasures of the Aquarians: The complete exhibit catalog of the Berkeley dig. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deever, B. (1994, October).Is this radical enough? Radical Curriculum reform, change, and the language of probability. Paper presented at the Journal of Curriculum Theorizing conference, Banff, Canada.

  • Densmore, K. (1987). Professionalism, proletarianization and teacher work. In T. Popkewitz (Ed.),Critical studies in teacher education: Its folklore, theory and practice (pp. 130–160). New York Falmer.

  • Eisner, E. (1985).The art of educational evaluation: A personal view. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, B. (1991).In the beginning: An introduction to archaeology. New York: Harper Collins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D. (1988).Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: The silent scientific revolution. New York: Praeger Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, B. (1984). Education and the retreat from democracy in the United States — 1979–198?Teachers College Record,86(2), 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1972).The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. (1993).The San Diego model: A community battles the religious right. Washington, DC: People for the American Way.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frymier, J. (1987, April).State-legislated curriculum: Why be concerned? Paper presented at the annual American Educational Research Association meeting, Washington, DC.

  • Giroux, H. (1993).Living dangerously: Mulitculturalism and the politics of difference. New York: Lang Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givon, T. (1979).On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, C. (1993).Renewing America's schools: A guide for school-based action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. (1984).A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodlad, J. (1992). On taking school reform seriously.Phi Delta Kappan,74(3), 232–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. (1988). The disenfranchisement of elementary teachers and strategies for resistance.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,3(3), 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. (1992).Elementary schooling for critical democracy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. (1994a). Circles of democracy: A school's internal governance.New Education: International Journal in Educational Theory and Practice,16(2), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. (1994b). External change agents and grassroots school reform: Reflections from the field.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,9(2), 113–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. (1995). Change without difference: School restructuring in historical perspective.Harvard Educational Review,65(1), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J., Baron, D., & Lessow, D. (1994, November).Diverse voices and common visions: Using ethnographic methods to initiate grassroots school reform. Oral presentation at the Coalition of Essential Schools Fall Forum, Chicago.

  • Gordon, T. (1974).Teacher effectiveness training. New York: Peter Wyden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graubard, A. (1972).Free the children: Radical reform and the free school movement. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (1988).The dialectic of freedom. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, B. & Gross, R. (1969).Radical school reform. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumet, M. (1988).Bitter milk: Women and teaching. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, E. (1987).Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingwerson, D. (1990). A superintendent's view: Learning to listen and trust each school faculty — Personal reflections of shared decision-making.School Administrator,47(8), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, G. (1994). Shotgun wedding: Notes on public education's encounter with the new Christian right.Phi Delta Kappan,75(9), k1-k12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozol, J. (1991).Savage inequalities: Children in American Schools. New York: Crown Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lienesch, R. (1993).Redeeming America: Piety and politics in the new Christian right. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, M. (1977). Demise of dialogue.The Center Magazine, January/February, 12–15.

  • Mayher, J. (1990).Uncommon sense: Theoretical practice in language education. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, J. (1992). Dilemmas of planning backwards: Rescuing a good idea.Teachers College Record,94(1), 152–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuillan, P. & Muncey, D. (1991).School-within-a-school restructuring and faculty divisiveness: Some examples from the coalition of essential schools. Unpublished paper.

  • Medler, K. (1972). Woman's high calling: The teaching profession in America.American Studies,13(1), 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirel, J. (1994). School reform unplugged: The Bensenville New American School Project, 1991–93.American Educational Research Journal,31(3), 481–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. (1986). When research does not help teachers.American Educator,10(2), 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill, A. (1977).Summerhill: A radical approach to child rearing. New York: Wallaby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noel-Hume, I. (1969).Historical archaeology. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, R. (1994). The institutional sources of educational reform: The case of school-based management.American Educational Research Journal,31(3), 519–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onore, C. & Lester, N. (1992, April).Changing schools by acting as if. Paper presented at the annual American Educational Research Association meeting, San Francisco, CA.

  • Parlett, M. & Hamilton, D. (1972).Evaluation as illumination: A new approach to the study of innovatory programs. Edinburgh, Scotland: Center for Research in the Educational Sciences, University of Edinburgh.

  • Percy, W. (1982).The message in the bottle. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, C. & Evans, W. (1991, February).Implementing school-based management in urban settings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.

  • Popkewitz, T., Tabachnick, B., & Wehlage, G. (1982).The myth of educational reform. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestine, N. (1992, April).Benchmarks of change: Assessing essential school restructuring efforts. Paper presented at the annual American Educational Research Association meeting, San Francisco, CA.

  • Quantz, R., Rogers, J., & Dantley, M. (1991). Rethinking transformative leadership: Toward democratic reform of schools.Journal of Education,173(3), 96–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, S. (1989).Spiritual warfare: The politics of the Christian right. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D. & Finn, C. (1988).What do our 17-year-olds know? New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C. & Bahn, P. (1991).Archaeology: Theories methods and practice. New York: Thans and Hudson, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, M. (1991). What we talk about when we talk about school reform.Harvard Educational Review,61(4), 434–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romberg, T. & Price, G. (1983). Curriculum change as cultural change. In G. Griffin (Ed.),Staff development (pp. 154–184). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. (1995).School change: The personal development of a point of view. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, S. (1990).The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it's too late? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuyler, R. (1978).Historical archaeology: A guide to substantive and theoretical contributions. Farmingdale, NY: Baywood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shor, I. (1986).Culture wars: School and society in the conservative restoration — 1969–1984. New York: Routledge & Keagan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, M. (in press). More than words: The generative power of transmediation for learning.Canadian Journal of Education.

  • Smith, G. (1993).Public schools that work: Creating community. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, J. (1993).Conflict of interests: The politics of American education. New York: Longman Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stager, M. & Fullan, M. (1992, April).Teacher purpose and educational change: Moving toward a broader agenda. Paper presented at the annual American Educational Research Association meeting, San Francisco, CA.

  • Watts, G. & Castle, S. (1992, April).The time dilemma in school restructuring. A paper presented at the annual American Educational Research Association meeting, San Francisco, CA.

  • Wirth, A. (1983).Productive work — in industry and schools: Becoming persons again. Lanham, MD: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, A. (1979).Legislated learning: The bureaucratization of the American classroom. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, C. & Glickman, C. (1986).Solving discipline problems: Strategies for classroom teachers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (1988). Democracy and the curriculum. In L. Beyer & M. Apple (Eds.),The curriculum: Problems, politics, and possibilities (pp. 166–187). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (1992).Schools that work: America's most innovative public education programs. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. (1986). Social and ethical dimensions of reform in teacher education. In J. Hoffman & S. Edwards (Eds.),Reality and reform in clinical teacher education (pp. 87–107). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goodman, J. Artifacts of change: An archaeology of school-based educational reform. Interchange 27, 279–312 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807409

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807409

Keywords

Navigation