Skip to main content
Log in

Book reviews

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Churchman, C. W. (1979).The systems approach and its enemies. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980).Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1982, March 5). Tomorrow's classrooms?Times Educational Supplement.

References

  • Bernstein, R. J. (1976).The restructuring of social and political theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933).How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, E. W., & Hannay, L. M. (1986). Towards a critical theory of reflective inquiry.Journal of Teacher Education,36, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. (1983).The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical.Curriculum Inquiry,6, 205–228.

    Google Scholar 

Reference

  • Enros, P., & Farley, M. (1986).University offices for technology transfer: Toward the service university. Ottawa: Science Council of Canada.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cragg, A.W., Dublin, M., Pape, S.L. et al. Book reviews. Interchange 20, 90–105 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807176

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807176

Navigation