References
Bates, R. (1982). Toward a critical practice of educational administration.Studies in Educational Administration,27, 1–15.
Battersby, D. (1987). Is there a place for ‘craft theory’ in educational administration?Educational Management and Administration,15(1), 63–66.
Churchland, P. (1986).Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind/brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Corson, D. (1987). An approach to research in educational administration.Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations,2(1), 20–36.
Evers, C. (1988). Educational administration and the new philosophy of science.Journal of Educational Administration,26(1), 3–22.
Foster, W. (1988).Paradigms and promises: New approaches to educational administration. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Press.
Greenfield, T. (1986). The decline and fall of science in educational administration.Interchange,17(2), 57–80.
Holmes, M. (1986). Comment on Thomas B. Greenfield.Interchange,17(2), 80–90.
Holmes, M. (1988). Absolutism and educational administration: A response to Ryan.Interchange,19(2), 71–75.
Lakatos, I. (1974). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.),Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakomski, G. (1987). Case study methodology and the rational management of interaction.Educational Management and Administration,15(2), 147–157.
Popper, K. (1959).The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Quine, W. (1961).From a logical point of view. New York: Harper & Row.
Ryan, J. (1988). Science in educational administration: A comment on the Holmes-Greenfield dialogue.Interchange,19(2), 68–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, J.A. Absolutism and science in educational administration. Interchange 20, 68–73 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807173
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807173