Skip to main content
Log in

Scripts and reading research

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper describes four writing systems and a few example scripts under each system. Under the heading “Research Common to Different Scripts,” the paper then discusses research on phonetic coding, eye movements in reading, and cortical processing, in English, Chinese, Japanese, and Korean scripts. Under the heading “Research Unique to Specific Scripts,” it discusses research on word recognition in English orthography, in Japanese Kanji and Kana, and in Korean Hangul. Linguistic, cognitive, and cortical processing seems to be similar for people reading sentences and text in different scripts; processing seems to be dissimilar for people recognizing individual symbols in different scripts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. J., & Huggins, A.W.F. (1985). The growth of children's sight vocabulary: A quick test with educational and theoretical implications.Reading Research Quarterly 20 262–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Lewis, V. L. (1981). Inner active processes in reading: The inner voice, the inner ear, and the inner eye. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.),Interactive processes in reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, C. K. (1965).Semantography (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Semantography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L., & Barnhart, C. L. (1961).Let's read. A linguistic approach. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, Y.-R. (1968).A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusion in immediate memory.British Journal of Psychology 55 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuzawa, S. (1968). Developmental study on the factors of the difficulty in reading Kanji.Science of Reading 11 16–21 (in Japanese with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gur, R. C., Gur, R. E., Obrist, W. D., Hungerbuhler, J. P., Younkin, D., Rosen, A. D., Skilnick, B. E., & Reirich, M. (1982). Sex and handedness differences in cerebral blood flow during rest and cognitive activity.Science 217 659–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. S. (1983). Right hemisphere language following brain bisection (a 20-year perspective).American Psychologist 38 525–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatta, T. (1978). Recognition of Japanese Kanji and Hirakana in the left and right visual fields.Japanese Psychological Research 20 51–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. (1970).Sign, symbol and script. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review 87 329–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, B., MacNaughton, S., Silverman, H. (1978).Handbook of Blissymbolics. Toronto: Blissymbol Communications Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawai, Y. (1966). Physical complexity of the Chinese letters and learning to read it.Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology 16 129–138 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochvil, P. (1968).The Chinese language today. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddieson, I. (1984).Patterns of sound. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishikawa, Y., & Niina, S. (1981). Modes of information processing underlying hemispheric functional differences.Japanese Journal of Psychology 51 335–342 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, J. A. (1984). Dyslexia in a right-handed patient with a posterior lesion of the right cerebral hemisphere.Neuropsychologia 22 265–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradis, M., Hagiwara, H., & Hildebrandt, N. (1985).Neurolinguistic aspects of the Japanese writing system. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, T., & Makita, K. (1973). Japan. In J. Downing (Ed.),Comparative reading. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, J. A. (1978). Eye movements, reading, and cognition. In J. W. Senders, D. F. Fisher, & R. A. Monty (Eds.),Eye movements and higher psychological functions (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, T., & Yasufuka, J. (1975). Development of the cognition of letters (2).Osaka University of Education Report 24 85–99 (in Japanese with English abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (1980). The Korean writing system: An alphabet? a syllabary? a logography? In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.),Processing of visible language (Vol. 2). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (1986a). The variety of scripts and reading.Proceedings of the 12th annual symposium of the Deseret Language and Linguistic Society. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I. (1986b). Research on the variety of scripts.Proceedings of the 12th annual symposium of the Deseret Language and Linguistic Society. Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. M. (1983).The psychology of reading. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, O. J. L., Hung, D. L., & Wang, S.-Y. (1977). Speech recoding in reading Chinese characters.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 3 621–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, O.J.L., Hung, D. L., Cotton, B., & Wang, W.S.-Y. (1979). Visual lateralization effects in reading Chinese characters.Nature 282 499–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidel, E. (1978a). Lexical organization in the right hemisphere. In P. A. Buser & A. Rougeul-Buser (Eds.),Cerebral correlates of conscious experience. (INSERM Symposium No. 6). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidel, E. (1978b). Concepts of cerebral dominance in the split brain. In P. A. Buser & A. Rougeul-Buser (Eds.),Cerebral correlates of conscious experience. (INSERM Symposium No. 6). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidel, E. (1983). A response to Gazzaniga: Learning in the right hemisphere, converging perspectives.American Psychologist 38 342–346.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is based on the keynote address and the seminar given at the 12th annual symposium of the Deseret Language and Linguistic Society, February, 1986, Provo, Utah; published in the proceedings of the symposium and reproduced by permission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, I. Scripts and reading research. Interchange 18, 78–88 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807061

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807061

Keywords

Navigation