Skip to main content
Log in

Literacy and language change: The special case of speech act verbs

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the methodological and theoretical issues that need to be addressed in testing the validity of proposed correlations between the rise of a certain class of words and the development of literacy. Olson and Astington (in press) suggest a correlation between the rise of a) assertive speech act verbs such asobserve,state, andclaim, b) literacy, and c) the Enlightenment. Data from the history of speech act verbs in English do not provide evidence for any privileged correlation with the Enlightenment, since assertives abound from Old and especially Middle English on. Possible correlations with literacy point not to writing as the motivating force but rather to the language of the law-courts, feudal practices, and rhetorical debate in the Middle Ages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1979).Linguistic communication and speech acts. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, E. (1971). Subjectivity in language. InProblems in general linguistics (M. E. Meek, Trans.). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, E. (1973).Indo-European language and society (E. Palmer, Trans.). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, L. (1939).Linguistic aspects of science: International encyclopedia of unified science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, W. (Ed.). (1980).The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. H., Richardson, M., & Fisher, J. L. (1984).An anthology of Chancery English. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frake, C. (1983). Did literacy cause the great cognitive divide? (Review article on Sylvia Scribner & Michael Cole,The psychology of literacy).American Ethnologist,10, 368–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. (1975). Hedged performatives. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.),Syntax and semantics III: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E. (1982). Felicity conditions and the history of some commissives in Middle English. Paper presented to the MLA Annual Meeting.

  • Heath, S. B. (in press). Critical factors in literacy development. In: S. de Castell, K. Egan, & A. Luke (Eds.),Literacy, society and schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hundert, E. J. (in preparation). Enlightenment and the decay of common sense. In F. van Holthoon & D. Olson (Eds.),Common sense.

  • Labov, W. (1974). On the use of the present to explain the past. In L. Heilmann (Ed.),Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of Linguists. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughren, M. (1982, June). A preliminary description of propositional particles in Warlpiri. Work Papers of SIL-AAB, Series A. Vol. 6,Papers in Warlpiri grammar in memory of Lothar Jagst.

  • Lyons, J. (1982). Deixis and subjectivity:Loquor, ergo sum? In R. J. Jarvella & W. Klein (Eds.),Speech, place, and action: Studies in deixis and related topics. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellinkoff, D. (1963).The language of the law. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. (in preparation).The world on paper.

  • Olson, D., & Astington, J. (in press). Children's acquisition of metalinguistic and metacognitive verbs. In W. Demopoulos & A. Marras (Eds.),Language learning and concept acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

  • Ong, W. (1982).Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, R. (1982).On literacy: The politics of the word from Homer to rock. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, F., & Maitland, F. W. (1905).The history of English law before the time of Edward I (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, M. Z. (1982). The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy.Language in Society,11, 203–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlieben-Lange, B. (1983).Traditionen des Sprechens: Elemente einer pragmatischen Sprachgeschichtsschreibung. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J.R. (1979).Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, E. (1971).Zum Verhältnis von Erbgut und Lehngut im Wortschatz Otfrids von Weissenburg. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, B. (1983).The implications of literacy: Written language and models of interpretation in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1982). Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives.Language,58, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toon, T. E. (1983).The politics of Early Old English sound change. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traugott, E. C. (1982). From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.),Perspectives on historical linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traugott, E. C. (1985).Literacy and language change: The special case of speech act verbs. The McLuhan Program in Culture and Technology, University of Toronto, Working Paper 11.

  • Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. (1985, Sept.). On the historical relation between mental and speech act verbs in English. Paper presented at ICHL VII, Pavia.

  • Vendler, Z. (1972).Res cogitans: An essay in rational psychology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viberg, A. (1983). The verbs of perception: A typological study. (In B. Butterworth, B. Comrie, & O. Dahl (Eds.),Explanation for language universals. Linguistics,21, 125–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.),Directions for historical linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupitza, J. (Ed.). (1966).Aelfrics Grammatik und Glossar. Berlin: Max Niehans Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Primary dictionaries consulted

  • Bosworth, J. (rev. by T. N. Toller). (1898).An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, C. D. (1949).A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, S. M., & Reidy, J. (1969-).Middle English Dictionary. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford English Dictionary.

  • Walde, A. (rev. by J. Pokorny). (1930).Vergleichendes Wörterbuch der indogermanischen Sprachen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is being reprinted from Judith Langer (Ed.),Language, Literacy and Culture: Issues of Society and Schooling/it (Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1987) with the permission of the publisher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Traugott, E.C. Literacy and language change: The special case of speech act verbs. Interchange 18, 32–47 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807058

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807058

Keywords

Navigation