Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cytometric and histopathologic features of tumors detected in a randomized mammography screening program: Correlation and relative prognostic influence

  • Report
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Cytometric determination of S-phase fraction and ploidy type was performed on 430 tumors detected within a randomized trial of mammographic screening. The results were compared to several histopathologic features. A high S-phase fraction was estimated in tumors with a high grade of malignancy and other histopathologic findings related to rapid tumor progression, including lack of tubule formation, a high mitotic index, marked nuclear pleomorphism, multifocal cancer growth, tumor emboli in lymphatic and blood vessels, tumor necrosis, and inflammatory reaction. DNA aneuploidy was correlated with a high malignancy grade, frequent mitoses, a high degree of nuclear pleomorphism, vascular invasion, necrosis, and the presence of noninvasive ductal carcinoma. Both cytometric variables were inversely related to the degree of elastosis. Positive nodes, large tumor size, DNA aneuploidy, a high S-phase fraction, high grade of malignancy, lack of tubule formation, as well as high mitotic index and pleomorphism, presence of multifocal cancer, and vascular invasion, predicted a significantly shorter distant recurrence-free interval after a median follow-up time of 46.6 months. Elastosis and the presence of estrogen and progesterone receptors indicated favorable prognosis. In the multivariate analysis, only lymph node status, tumor size S-phase fraction, and multifocal growth pattern had independent prognostic value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Scarff RW, Torloni H: Histological typing of breast tumours. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  2. Black MM, Opler SR, Speer FD: Survival in breast cancer cases in relation to the structure of the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes. Surg Gynecol Obstet 100: 543–551, 1955

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cornelisse CJ, van de Velde CJH, Caspers RJC, Moolenaar AJ, Hermans J: DNA ploidy and survival in breast cancer patients. Cytometry 8: 225–234, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harvey J, de Klerk N, Berryman I, Sterett G, Byrne M, Papadimitriou J: Nuclear DNA content and prognosis in human breast cancer: a static cytophotometric study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 9: 101–109, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hedley DW, Rugg CA, Gelber RD: Association of DNA index and S-phase fraction with prognosis of nodes positive early breast cancer. Cancer Res 47: 4729–4735, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kallioniemi OP, Hietanen T, Mattila J, Lehtinen M, Lauslahti K, Koivula T: Aneuploid DNA content and high Sphase fraction of tumour cells are related to poor prognosis in patients with primary breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23: 277–282, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Klintenberg C, Stål O, Nordenskjöld B, Wallgren A, Arvidsson S, Skoog L: Proliferative index, cytosol estrogen receptor, and axillary node status as prognostic predictors in human mammary carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 7: 99–106, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clark GM, Dressler LG, Owens MA, Pounds G, Oldaker T, McGuire WL: Prediction of relapse or survival in patients with node-negative breast cancer by DNA flow cytometry. N Engl J Med 320: 627–633, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kallioniemi OP, Blanco G, Alavaikko M, Hietanen T, Mattila J, Lauslahti K, Lehtinen M, Koivula T: Improving the prognostic value of DNA flow cytometry in breast cancer by combining DNA index and S-phase fraction. Cancer 62: 2183–2190, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer JS, Friedman E, McCrate MM, Bauer WC: Prediction of early course of breast carcinoma by thymidine labelling. Cancer 51: 1879–1886, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer JS, Prey MU, Babcock DS, McDivitt RW: Breast carcinoma cell kinetics morphology, stage, and host characteristics. Lab Invest 54: 41–51, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McDivitt RW, Stone KR, Craig RB, Palmer JO, Meyer JS, Bauer WC: A proposed classification of breast cancer based on kinetic information. Cancer 57: 269–276, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hatschek T, Fagerberg G, Stål O, Sullivan S, Carstensen J, Gröntoft O, Nordenskjöld B: Cytometric characterization and clinical course of breast cancer diagnosed in a population based screening program. Cancer 64: 1074–1081, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gröntoft O: Staging and grading of invasive ductal carcinoma in a randomized population screened by mammography: the first and second screens. In: Day NE, Miller AB (eds) Screening for Breast Cancer. Hans Huber Publishers, Toronto, 1988, pp 79–82

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fagerberg G, Baldetorp L, Gröntoft O, Lundström B, Månsson JC, Nordenskjöld B: Effects of repeated mammographic screening on breast cancer stage distribution. Acta Radiol Oncol 24: 465–472, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. World Health Organization: Histological typing of breast tumours (rev ed). Geneva, 1981

  17. Bergman C, Gröntoft O, Olofsson J, Risberg B: A technique for whole-organ sectioning and its applications. Science Tools 27: 46–50, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  18. Azzopardi JG: Cancerization of lobules. In: Azzopardi JG (ed) Problems in Breast Pathology. W.B. Saunders Company Ltd, London, 1979, pp 203–213

    Google Scholar 

  19. Risberg B, Stål O, Bjelkenkrantz K, Hatschek T, Franzén G, Arvidsson S, Nordenskjöld B: Use of formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tumours for estimation of cellular DNA content and S-phase fraction by static cytofluorometry. Acta Radiol Oncol 24: 537–544, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bjelkenkrantz K, Stål O, Gröntoft O: A fast and reliable system for microcomputerized DNA cytofluorometry in tumour pathology. Histochem 79: 145–155, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wrange Ö, Nordenskjöld B, Gustafsson JÅ: Cytosol estradiol receptor in human mammary carcinoma: an assay based on isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gel. Anal Biochem 85: 461–475, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wrange Ö, Humla S, Ramberg I, Gustafsson SA, Skoog L, Nordenskjöld B, Gustafsson JÅ: Progestin-receptor analysis in human breast cancer cytosol by isoelectric focusing in slabs of polyacrylamide gel. J Steroid Biochem 14: 141–148, 1981

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Armitage P, Berry G: Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford 1987

    Google Scholar 

  24. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, Breslow NE, Cox DR, Howard SV, Mantel N, McPherson K: Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examples. Br J Cancer 35: 1–39, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaplan E, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Amer Statist Assoc 53: 457–481, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cox DR: Regression models and life tables. J R Statist Soc B 34: 187–220, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dowle CS, Owainati A, Robins A, Burns K, Ellis IO, Elston CW, Blamey RW: Prognostic significance of the DNA content of human breast cancer. Br J Surg 74: 133–136, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Héry M, Gioanni J, Lalanne CM, Namer M, Courdi A: The DNA labelling index: a prognostic factor in node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 9: 207–211, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Silvestrini R, Daidone MG, Gasparini G: Cell kinetics as a prognostic marker in node-negative breast cancer. Cancer 56: 1982–1987, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tubiana M, Pejovic MH, Chavaudra N, Contesso G, Malaise EP: The long-term prognostic significance of the thymidine labelling index in breast cancer. Int J Cancer 33: 441–445, 1984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wallgren A, Silfverswärd C, Eklund G: Prognostic factors in mammary carcinoma. Acta Radiol 15: 1–16, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rank F, Dombernowsky P, Jespersen NCB, Pedersen BV, Keiding N: Histologic malignancy grading of invasive ductal breast carcinoma. Cancer 60: 1299–1305, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fisher ER, Gregorio RM, Fisher B, Redmond C, Vellios F, Sommers SC: The pathology of invasive breast cancer. A syllabus derived from findings of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (Protocol No. 4). Cancer 36: 1–85, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Carter D, Pipkin RD, Shepard RH, Elkins RC, Abbey H: Relationship of necrosis and tumor border to lymph node metastases and 10-year survival in carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 2: 39–46, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gump FE, Shikora S, Habif DV, Kister S, Logerfo P, Estabrook A: The extent and distribution of cancer in breasts with palpable primary tumors. Ann Surg 204: 384–390, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. van de Velde CJH, Gallager HS, Giacco GG: Prognosis in node negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 8: 189–196, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sampat MB, Sirsat MV, Gangadharan P: Prognostic significance of blood vessel invasion in carcinoma of the breast in women. J Surg Oncol 9: 623–632, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Davis BW, Gelber R, Goldhirsch A, Hartmann WH, Hollaway L, Russell I, Rudenstam CM: Prognostic significance of peritumoral vessel invasion in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy for breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis. Hum Pathol 16: 1212–1218, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mate TP, Carter D, Fischer DB, Hartman PV, McKhann C, Merino M, Prosnitz LR, Weissberg JB: A clinical and histopathologic analysis of the results of conservation surgery and radiation therapy in stage I and II breast carcinoma. Cancer 58: 1995–2002, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Parham DM, Robertson AJ, Brown RA: Morphometric analysis of breast carcinoma: association and survival. J Clin Pathol 41: 173–177, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fisher ER, Sass R, Fisher B, Gregorio R, Brown R, Wickerham L: Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (Protocol 6). II. Relation of local breast recurrence to multicentricity. Cancer 57: 1717–1724, 1986

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Humeniuk V, Forrest APM, Hawkins RA, Prescott R: Elastosis and primary breast cancer. Cancer 52: 1448–1452, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Millis RR: Correlation of hormone receptors with pathological features in human breast cancer. Cancer 46: 2869–2871, 1980

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oncology, University Hospital, S-581 85, Linköping, Sweden

    T. Hatschek, O. Stål, S. Sullivan, J. Carstensen & B. Nordenskjöld

  2. Department of Pathology, University Hospital, S-581 85, Linköping, Sweden

    O. Gröntoft

  3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, S-581 85, Linköping, Sweden

    G. Fagerberg

Authors
  1. T. Hatschek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. Gröntoft
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Fagerberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. O. Stål
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. Carstensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. B. Nordenskjöld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hatschek, T., Gröntoft, O., Fagerberg, G. et al. Cytometric and histopathologic features of tumors detected in a randomized mammography screening program: Correlation and relative prognostic influence. Breast Cancer Res Tr 15, 149–160 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01806352

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01806352

Key words

Search

Navigation