Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative comparison of estradiol and progesterone receptor contents of primary and metastatic human breast tumors in relation to response to endocrine treatment

  • Report
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Cytosol receptors for estradiol (RE) and progesterone (RP) in breast tumors from women attending one clinic have been analyzed. The analysis involved a single concentration of [3H] ligand and low speed centrifugation of homogenates. Analysis of tumors immediately before the start of first endocrine treatment indicated a poor response rate in patients with tumor RE <20 fmol/mg protein. A cut-off value of 20 fmol/mg protein gave the best discrimination between responders and nonresponders in both pre- and postmenopausal patients. An appreciable number of responses (17%) was seen with RP negative tumors (<5 fmol/mg protein) and analysis of this receptor alone is not recommended. Combined analysis of RE and RP indicated good response rates for RE+ RP+ (64%) and RE − RP+ (67%) tumors and a low response rate for RE− RP− (9%) tumors. Responses also occurred in patients with RE+ RP− tumors (30%). The influence of cut-off value and menopausal status on clinical usefulness of combined RE and RP analysis is discussed.

Data are also presented on the clinical value of receptor analyses on primary tumors in predicting the endocrine sensitivity of subsequent metastatic disease.

Receptor results for tumors obtained at different times from the same patient are presented and discussed. Receptor phenotype of some tumors does change with time and this is influenced by receptor amount, histological appearance, and intervening treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Cancer 46 (Supplement): 2759–2963, 1980.

  2. Blamey RW, Bishop HM, Blake JRS, Doyle PJ, Elston CW, Haybittle JL, Nicholson RI, Griffiths K: Relationship between primary breast tumor receptor status and patient survival. Cancer 46 (Supplement): 2765–2774, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. DeSombre ER, Jensen EV: Estrophilin assays in breast cancer: quantitative features and application to the mastectomy specimen. Cancer 46 (Supplement): 2783–2788, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. King RJB: Analysis of estradiol and progesterone receptors in early and advanced breast tumors. Cancer 46 (Supplement): 2818–2821, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nomura Y, Yamagata J, Takenaka K, Tashiro H: Steroid hormone receptors and clinical usefulness in human breast cancer. Cancer 46 (Supplement): 2880–2883, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Osborne CK, Yochmowitz MG, Knight WA, McGuire WL: The value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the treatment of breast cancer. Cancer 46 (Supplement): 2884–2888, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Singhakowinta A, Saunders DE, Brooks SC, Samal B, Vaitkevicius VK: Clinical application of estrogen receptor in breast cancer. Cancer 46 (Supplement): 2932–2938, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell FC, Blamey RW, Elston CW, Morris AH, Nicholson RI, Griffiths K, Haybittle JL: Quantitative oestradiol receptor values in primary breast cancer and response of metastases to endocrine therapy. Lancet ii: 1317–1319, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hayward JL, Carbone PP, Heuson JC, Kumaoka S, Segaloff A, Rubens RD: Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer. Cancer 39: 1289–1294, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. King RJB, Hayward JL, Kumaoka S, Yamamoto H: Comparison of soluble oestrogen and progestin receptor content of primary breast tumors from Japan and Britain. Eur J Cancer 13: 967–970, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. King RJB, Redgrave S, Hayward JL, Millis RR, Rubens RD: The measurement of receptors for oestradiol and progesterone in human breast tumors.In RJB King (ed). Steroid Receptor Assays in Human Breast Cancer. Omega Publishing, Cardiff, 1979, pp 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ: Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193: 265–275, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Horwitz KB, McGuire WL, Pearson OH, Segaloff A: Predicting response to endocrine therapy in human breast cancer: an hypothesis. Science 189: 726–727, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Degenshein GA, Bloom N, Tobin E: The value of progesterone receptor assays in the management of advanced breast cancer. Cancer 46 (Supplement): 2789–2793, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sarrif AM, Durant JR: Evidence that estrogen-receptornegative, progesterone-receptor-positive breast and ovarian carcinomas contain estrogen receptor. Cancer 48: 1215–1220, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

King, R.J.B., Stewart, J.F., Millis, R.R. et al. Quantitative comparison of estradiol and progesterone receptor contents of primary and metastatic human breast tumors in relation to response to endocrine treatment. Breast Cancer Res Tr 2, 339–346 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01805875

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01805875

Keywords

Navigation