Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quality control for estrogen receptor quantification by dextran-coated charcoal assay: A single laboratory's experience

  • Reports
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Wide fluctuations in results obtained by different laboratories for the content of estrogen receptors from a single source of tissue powder were reported by several investigators at the 1979 NCI Consensus Committee Meeting for Steroid Receptors in Breast Cancer and were further supported by data collected by our laboratory for the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. In a multilab study the inconsistency in the receptor content is a product of the variations associated with the assay procedures used by different laboratories and those due to unavoidable daily changes in the experimental conditions within each laboratory. In this report we present data on the variation of estrogen receptor measurements obtained by a single laboratory for any single source of tissue powder repeatedly analyzed. A retrospective analysis of the data collected on the receptor content of several different batches of calf uteri analyzed on different days (inter-assay variation) under uniform conditions revealed a coefficient of variation averaging ± 35% (standard deviation ÷ mean × 100). Experiments showed that the fluctuations in the receptor yield from aliquots of the same tissue powder are primarily an effect of the homogenization step that precedes cytosol preparation. Therefore, for establishing quality control, distribution of lyophilized cytosols should precede lyophilized powders to test the efficiency of performance of laboratories. A homogenizer designed to minimize thermal denaturation is also essential.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Steroid Receptors in Breast Cancer: National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference. Bethesda, Maryland, June 27–29, 1979. Cancer 46: 2759–2963 (Suppl), 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Raam S, Gelman R, Cohen JL: Estrogen receptor assay: inter-laboratory and intra-laboratory variations in the measurement of receptors using dextran-coated charcoal technique: a study sponsored by ECOG. Eur J Cancer 17: 643–649, 1981.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nash AR, Sarfaty GA: Laboratory variability in estrogen receptor (ER) assays — The Australian experience.In GA Sarfaty, AR Nash and DD Keightly (eds): Estrogen Receptor Assays in Breast Cancer. Masson Publishing USA, Inc., New York, 1981, pp 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koenders A, Geurts-Moespot J, Hendriks T, Benraad Th: The Netherlands inter-laboratory quality control program of steroid receptor assays in breast cancer.In GA Sarfaty, AR Nash and DD Keightly (eds): Estrogen Receptor Assays in Breast Cancer. Masson Publishing USA, Inc., New York, 1981, pp 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wittliff JL, Wiehle SA, Eckman JB Jr, Smalley RV, Bartolucci AA, Durant JR: A quality assurance program for steroid receptor analyses used by the South-eastern Cancer Study Group (SECSG).In GA Sarfaty, AR Nash and DD Keightly (eds): Estrogen Receptor Assays in Breast Cancer. Masson Publishing USA, Inc., New York, 1981, pp 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McGuire WL, DeLaGarza M: Improved sensitivity in the measurement of estrogen receptors in breast cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 37: 986–989, 1973.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ: Protein measurements with Folin-phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193: 265–275, 1951.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Furnival GM, Wilson RW Jr: Regressions by leaps and bounds. Technometrics 16 (4): 499–511, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hollander M, Wolfe DA: Nonparametric Statistical Methods. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1973, p 27.

    Google Scholar 

  10. DeGroot MH: Probability and Statistics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, 1975, p 426.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tufts University Medical Cancer Unit, Lemuel Shattuck Hospital, 170 Morton Street, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Shanthi Raam Ph.D., Judith Faulkner B.A., Gail M. White B.S. & Joseph L. Cohen M.D.

  2. Biostatistics Department, Sidney Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Rebecca Gelman Ph.D.

Authors
  1. Shanthi Raam Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rebecca Gelman Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Judith Faulkner B.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gail M. White B.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joseph L. Cohen M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Our steroid receptor laboratory has been proficiency tested for estrogen and progesterone receptor analysis of breast cancer by NSABP.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raam, S., Gelman, R., Faulkner, J. et al. Quality control for estrogen receptor quantification by dextran-coated charcoal assay: A single laboratory's experience. Breast Cancer Res Tr 2, 111–117 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01805724

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01805724

Keywords

Search

Navigation