Abstract
Variable expressivity of a mutant gene determining tubular flower form in annual chrysanthemum results in phenotypic variation approaching a continuous pattern. The analysis shows that this variability is primarily conditioned by variable genotypic background of the individual plants although environmental factors are also involved. It is suggested that regulation of phenotypic expressivity of qualitative genetic potentialities can lead to a pattern of continuous variation characteristic of the quantitative traits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bezem, J. J. &F. H. Sobels (1953). Penetrance and expressivity in the genotypeAbnormal abdomen ofD. melanogaster.Verh. Kon. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Ser. C.56: 48–61.
Brian, P. W. &H. G. Hemming (1955). The effect of gibberellic acid on shoot growth of pea seedlings.Physiol. Plantarum 8: 669–681.
Brink, R. A. (1958). Paramutation at theR locus in maize.Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 23: 379–391.
Goldschmidt, R. B. (1938). Physiological genetics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
Morgan, T. H. (1929). Variability ineyeless. Publ. Carnegie Inst. nr.399: 139–169.
Phinney, B. O. (1956). Growth response of single-gene dwarf mutants in maize to gibberellic acid.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)42: 185–189.
Rana, R. S., H. K. Jain &S. K. Nerwal (1963). Variable expressivity of an induced dominant mutant ofCosmos.Indian J. Genet. 23: 325–330.
Scharloo, W. (1961). Temperature and mutant expression.Experientia 17: 121–122.
Timoféeff-Ressowsky, N. W. (1927). Studies on the phenotypic manifestation of hereditary factors.Genetics 12: 128–198.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rana, R.S. Phenotypic variability of an induced mutant of annual chrysanthemum. Genetica 35, 236–240 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01804890
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01804890