Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Der ‚intentionale Fehlschluß‘ — ein Dogma?

Systematischer Forschungsbericht zur Kontroverse um eine intentionalistische Konzeption in den Textwissenschaften

  • Bericht
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. (1972): Meyer H. Abrams, What's the Use of Theorizing About the Arts? In: Morton W. Bloomfield (ed.), In Search of Literary Theory. Ithaca/London, S. 1–54.

  2. (1955): Henry David Aiken, The Aesthetic Relevance of Artist's Intentions. In: The Journal of Philosophy 52, S. 742–53 (auch in Kennick [ed.] 1964, S. 403–12).

    Google Scholar 

  3. (1963/64): Alfred Owen Aldridge, Biography in the Interpretation of Poetry. In: College English 25, S. 412–20.

    Google Scholar 

  4. (1963): William P. Alston, Meaning and Use. In: The Philosophical Quarterly 13, S. 107–24 (mit „revisions and additions“ in Parkinson [ed.] 1968, S. 141–65).

    Google Scholar 

  5. (1964): Philosophy of Language. Englewood Cliffs/N.J.

  6. (1971): Varieties of Privileged Access. In: The American Philosophical Quarterly 8, S. 223–41.

    Google Scholar 

  7. (1975): Charles Altieri, The Poem as Act: A Way to Reconcile Presentational and Mimetic Theories. In: Iowa Review 6, S. 103–24.

    Google Scholar 

  8. (1956/57): Gertrude E. M. Anscombe, Intention. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57, S. 321–32.

    Google Scholar 

  9. (1957): Intention. Oxford (1957) 1972.

  10. (1977): Thomas Anz und Michael Stark, Literaturwissenschaftliches Interpretieren als regelgeleitetes Verhalten. In: DVjs 51, S. 272 bis 299.

    Google Scholar 

  11. (1981): Karl-Otto Apel, Intentions, Conventions, and Reference to Things: Dimensions of Understanding Meaning in Hermeneutics and in Analytic Philosophy of Language. In: Herman Parret and Jacques Bouveresse (eds.), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, S. 79–111.

  12. (1976/77): Christopher E. Arthur, Gadamer and Hirsch: The Canonical Work and the Interpreter's Intention. In: Cultural Hermeneutics 4, S. 183–97.

    Google Scholar 

  13. (1948/49): Karl Aschenbrenner, Intention and Understanding. In: University of California Publications in Philosophy 25, S. 229–70.

    Google Scholar 

  14. (1973): Robert Audi, Intending. In: The Journal of Philosophy 70, S. 387–403.

    Google Scholar 

  15. (1962): John Langshaw Austin, Zur Theorie der Sprechakte (How To Do Things With Words, 1962). Deutsche Bearbeitung von Eike von Savigny. Stuttgart (1972).

  16. (1979): Kent Bach und Robert M. Harnish, Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge/Mass.

  17. (1979): Thomas T. Ballmer, Probleme der Klassifikation von Sprechakten. In: Grewendorf (Hrg.) 1979, S. 247–74.

  18. (1981): Thomas T. Ballmer and Waltraud Brennenstuhl, Speech Act Classification: A Study in th Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs. Berlin.

  19. (1964): Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, More on the Fallcy of Composition. In: Mind 73, S. 125–26.

    Google Scholar 

  20. (1952): Frederick W. Bateson, ‚Intention‘ and Blake's ‚Jerusalem‘. In: Essays in Criticism 2, S. 106–10 und 113–14.

    Google Scholar 

  21. (1974): Klaus Baumgärtner, Sprache, Technik und Dichtung. In: Marlis Gerhardt (Hrg.), Linguistik und Sprachphilosophie. München, S. 171–89.

  22. (1953): Monroe Curtis Beardsley and William K. Wimsatt, Jr., Intention. In: Joseph T. Shipley (ed.), Dictionary of World Literature. Criticism — Forms — Techniques. New Revised Edition. Paterson/N.J., S. 229–32.

  23. (1958): Monroe Curtis Beardsley, Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. New York.

  24. (1967/68): [Rez.:] Barrett, S. J., ed., Collected Papers on Aesthetics. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26, S. 144–46.

    Google Scholar 

  25. (1968): Textual Meaning and Authorial Meaning. In: Genre 1, S. 169–81.

    Google Scholar 

  26. (1970): The Possibility of Criticism. Detroit.

  27. (1973): The Concept of Literature. In: Frank Brady, John Palmer, and Marti Price (eds.), Literary Theory and Structure. Essays in Honor of William K. Wimsatt. New Haven and London, S. 23–39.

  28. (1977/78): Some Problems of Critical Interpretation: A Commentary. In: The Journal of Aestetics and Art Criticism 36, S. 351–60.

    Google Scholar 

  29. (1978): Aesthetic Intentions and Fictive Illocutions. In: Hernadi (ed.) 1978, S. 161–77.

  30. (1946): Montgomery Belgion, The Poet's Name. In: Sewanee Review 54, S. 635–49.

    Google Scholar 

  31. (1976): Jonathan Bennett, Linguistic Behaviour. Cambridge.

  32. (1973): Isaiah Berlin et al., Essays on J. L. Austin. Oxford.

  33. (1979): J. I. Biro, Intentionalism in the Theory of Meaning. In: The Monist 63, S. 238–58.

    Google Scholar 

  34. (1958): Max Black, Notes on the Meaning of ‚Rule‘. In: Theoria 24, S. 107–26 und 136–61.

    Google Scholar 

  35. (1972/73): Bedeutung und Intention (Meaning and Intention: An Examination of Grice's Views, 1972/73). In: Meggle (Hrg.) 1979, S. 52–81.

  36. (1975): Steven E. Boër and George S. Pappas, The Epistemology of Speaker-Meaning. In: The Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53, S. 204–19.

    Google Scholar 

  37. (1940): Otto Friedrich Bollnow, Was heißt, einen Schriftsteller besser verstehen, als er sich selber verstand? In: DVjs 18, S. 117–38.

    Google Scholar 

  38. (1974): Wayne C. Booth, The Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago and London.

  39. (1970/71): Maria Borroff, Creativity, Poetic Language, and the Computer. In: The Yale Review 60, S. 481–513.

    Google Scholar 

  40. (1950): O. K. Bouwsma, The Expression Theory of Art (1950). In: Kennick (ed.), 1964, S. 261–82.

  41. (1963): Fredson Bowers, Textual Criticism. In: James Thorpe (ed.), The Aims and Methods of Scholarship in Modern Languages and Literatures. New York, S. 23–42.

  42. (1947): Cleanth Brooks, Criticism and Literary History: Marvell's Horatian Ode. In: Sewanee Review 55, S. 199–222.

    Google Scholar 

  43. (1960): Cleanth Brooks and Robert Penn Warren, Understanding Poetry. Third Edition. New York.

  44. (1968): Merle E. Brown, Interpretation or Poetry. In: Genre 1, S. 230–241.

    Google Scholar 

  45. (1973): Robert L. Brown, Jr., Language Acts in Context. University of Michigan, Ph. D., 1973 (University Microfilms).

  46. (1974): Intentions and the Context of Poetry. In: Centrum 2, 1, S. 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  47. (1978): Robert L. Brown, Jr., and Martin Steinmann, Jr., Native Readers of Fiction: A Speech-Act and Genre-Rule Approach to Defining Literature. In: Hernadi (ed.) 1978, S. 141–61.

  48. (1975): James E. Broyles, The Fallacies of Composition and Division. In: Philosophy and Rhetoric 8, S. 108–13.

    Google Scholar 

  49. (1977/78): William E. Cain, Authority, „Cognitive Atheism“, and the Aims of Interpretation: The Literary Theory of E. D. Hirsch. In: College English 39, S. 333–45.

    Google Scholar 

  50. (1977): J. R. Cameron, Linguistic Behaviour. In: The Philosophical Quarterly 27, S. 338–52.

    Google Scholar 

  51. (1975): B. G. Campbell, Toward a Workable Taxonomy of Illocutionary Forces, and Its Implication to Works of Imaginative Literature. In: Language and Style 8, S. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  52. (1964): William H. Capitan, The Artist's Intention, In: Revue Internationale de Philosophie 18, S. 323–34.

    Google Scholar 

  53. (1968): Gale H. Carrithers, Jr., How Literary Things Go: Contra Hirsch. In: Genre 1, S. 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  54. (1979): Ronald Carter, [Rez.:] Mary Louise Pratt, Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse [...]. In: Journal of Literary Semantics, S. 45–47.

  55. (1971): Hector-Neri Castaňeda, Intentions and the Structure of Intending. In: The Journal of Philosophy 68, S. 453–66.

    Google Scholar 

  56. (1977/78): V. K. Chari, Validity in Interpretation: Some Indian Views. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36, S. 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  57. (1958): Roderick Chisholm and Wilfrid Sellars, Intentionality and the Mental. In: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 2, S. 507–39.

    Google Scholar 

  58. (1970): Roderick Chisholm, The Structure of Intention. In: The Journal of Philosophy 67, S. 633–47.

    Google Scholar 

  59. (1975): Noam Chomsky, Reflexionen über die Sprache (Reflections on Language, 1975). (Frankfurt am Main 1977).

  60. (1963/64): Frank Cioffi, Intention and Interpretation in Criticism. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 64, S. 85–106 (auch in Margolis [ed.] 1978, S. 307–24).

    Google Scholar 

  61. (1972): A. J. Close, ‚Don Quixotte‘ and the ‚Intentionalist Fallacy‘ (1972). In: Newton-de Molina (ed.) 1976, S. 174–93.

  62. (1975): Ted Cohen, Figurative Speech and Figurative Acts. In: The Journal of Philosophy 72, S. 669–84.

    Google Scholar 

  63. (1965): Richard Cole, A Note on Informal Fallacies. In: Mind 74, S. 432–33.

    Google Scholar 

  64. (1972): David E. Cooper, Meaning and Illocutions. In: The American Philosophical Quarterly 9, S. 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  65. (1981): Marilyn M. Cooper, Implicature, Convention, and ‚The Taming of the Shrew‘. In: Poetica 10, S. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  66. (1966): Irving Marver Copi, Introduction to Logic (1953). Second Edition. New York.

  67. (1974/75): Ramona Cormier, Indeterminacy and Aesthetic Theory. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33, S. 285–92.

    Google Scholar 

  68. (1952): R. S. Crane, Introduction. In: Id. (ed.), Critics and Criticism. Ancient and Modern. Chicago/London, S. 1–24.

  69. (1975): Jonathan Culler, Structuralist Poetics. Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature. London.

  70. (1967): Phillip Damon (ed.), Literary Cirticism and Historical Understanding. Selected Papers from the English Institute. New York and London.

  71. (1979): Lutz Danneberg und Hans-Harald Müller, Verwissenschaftlichung der Literaturwissenschaft. Ansprüche, Strategien, Resultate. In: Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 10, S. 162–191.

    Google Scholar 

  72. (1980): Ein Rahmenkonzept zur (Re-)Konstruktion und Evaluation von Vorschlägen zur wissenschaftlichen Fundierung der Literaturwissenschaft. In: Eschbach/Rader (Hrg.) 1980, S. 17–37.

  73. (1981): Probleme der Textinterpretation. Analytische Rekonstruktion und Versuch einer konzeptionellen Lösung. In: KΩΔIKAΣ/Code 3, S. 133–68.

    Google Scholar 

  74. (1983): Theoretische Probleme der Interpretation in den Textwissenschaften. Erscheint 1983.

  75. (1977): Jacques Derrida, Signature Event Context (Signature événement contexte, 1971). In: Glyph 1 (1977), S. 172–97.

  76. (1967/68): George Dickie, [Rez.:] E. D. Hirsch, Validity in Interpretation [...]. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26, S. 550–52.

    Google Scholar 

  77. (1968): Meaning and Intention. In: Genre 1, S. 182–89.

    Google Scholar 

  78. (1971): Aesthetics: An Introduction. (Indianapolis).

  79. (1974): Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Ithaca/N.Y.

  80. (1979): Wolfgang Dittel, Intention und Kommunikation. Beitrag zu einer Theorie der Bedeutung. (Königstein/Ts.).

  81. (1980): Carol Donnell-Kotrozo, The Intentional Fallacy: An Applied Reappraisal. In: The British Journal of Aesthetics 20, S. 356–65.

    Google Scholar 

  82. (1977): Denis Dutton, Plausibility and Aesthetic Interpretation. In: Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7, S. 327–40.

    Google Scholar 

  83. (1969): Marcia Muelder Eaton, Art, Artifacts, and Intentions. In: The American Philosophical Quarterly 6, S. 165–69.

    Google Scholar 

  84. (1970/71): Good and Correct interpretations of Literature. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 29, S. 227–33.

    Google Scholar 

  85. (1973): Liars, Ranters, and Dramatic Speakers. In: Benjamin Tilghman (ed.), Language and Aesthetics. Contributions to the Philosophy of Art. Lawrence/Manhattan/Wichita.

  86. (1957): Leon Edel, Literary Biography. The Alexander Lectures 1955–56. London.

  87. (1968): Arthur Efron, Logic, Hermeneutics, and Literary Context. In: Genre 1, S. 214–29.

    Google Scholar 

  88. (1972): Veronika Ehrich und Günter Saile, Über nicht-direkte Sprechakte. In: Dieter Wunderlich (Hrg.), Linguistische Pragmatik. (Frankfurt am Main), S. 255–87.

  89. (1971): Hans Eichner, Dichterische Absicht und literarische Deutung. In: Wolfgang Paulsen (Hrg.), Psychologie in der Literaturwissenschaft. Viertes Amherster Kolloquium zur modernen deutschen Literatur. Heidelberg, S. 56–78.

  90. (1974): A. J. Ellis, Intention and Interpretation in Literature. In: The British Journal of Aesthetics 14, S. 315–25.

    Google Scholar 

  91. (1951): Frank H. Ellis ‚Gray's, Elegy‘: The Biographical Problem in Literary Criticism. In: Publications of the Modern Language Association 66, S. 971–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  92. (1966): John M. Ellis, D. G. Mowatt and H. S. Robertson, A Closer Look at „Aims and Methods“. In: Modern Language Journal 50, S. 281–85.

    Google Scholar 

  93. (1974): John M. Ellis, The Theory of Literary Criticism: A Logical Analysis. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London.

  94. (1980): Nils Erik Enkvist, [Rez.:] Pratt, Mary Louise. Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse [...]. In: Journal of Linguistics 16, S. 110–13.

    Google Scholar 

  95. (1980): Achim Eschbach und Wendelin Rader (Hrg.), Literatursemiotik I. Methoden — Analysen — Tendenzen. Tübingen.

  96. (1971): Peter Arthur Facione, The Theory of Meaning as Intention. Michigan State University, Ph.D., 1971 (University Microfilms).

  97. (1973): Meaning and Intending. In: The American Philosophical Quarterly 10, S. 277–87.

    Google Scholar 

  98. (1966/67): Albert Prior Fall, Intention and the Interpretation of Works of Art. In: University of Toronto Quarterley 36, S. 12–23.

    Google Scholar 

  99. (1952): Leslie A. Fiedler, Archetype and Signature: A Study of the Relationship Between Biography and Poetry. In: Sewanee Review 60, S. 253–73 (deutsch in Strelka/Hinderer [Hrg.] 1970, S. 349–368).

    Google Scholar 

  100. (1976): Stanley E. Fish, How To Do Things With Austin and Searle: Speech Act Theory and Literary Criticism. In: Modern Language Notes 91, S. 983–1025.

    Google Scholar 

  101. (1964): Brice Noel Fleming, On Intention. In: Philosophical Review 73, S. 301–20.

    Google Scholar 

  102. (1956): Antony Flew, Motives and the Unconscious. In: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 1, S. 155–73.

    Google Scholar 

  103. (1980): Nicholas Folion [Rez.:] Mary Louise Pratt, Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse [...]. In: Journal of Pragmatics 4, S. 61–64.

    Google Scholar 

  104. (1973): L. W. Forguson, Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts. In: Berlin et al. 1973, S. 160–85.

  105. (1975a): A. P. Foulkes, The Search for Literary Meaning. A Semiotic Approach to the Problem of Interpretation in Education. Bern/Frankfurt am Main.

  106. (1975b): Relevance and Meaning in the Interpretation of Literary Texts. In: Journal of Literary Semantics 4, S. 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  107. (1975/76): Alastair Fowler, The Selection of Literary Constructs. In: New Literary History 7, S. 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  108. (1976): Intention Floreat. In: Newton-de Molina (ed.) 1976, S. 242–55.

  109. (1977): Manfred Frank, Das individuelle Allgemeine. Textstrukturierung und -interpretation nach Schleiermacher. (Frankfurt am Main).

  110. (1980): Die Entropie der Sprache. Überlegungen zur Debatte Searle-Derrida. In: Id., Das Sagbare und das Unsagbare. (Frankfurt am Main 1980), S. 141–210.

  111. (1981): Harald Fricke, Norm und Abweichung. Eine Philosophie der Literatur. München.

  112. (1973): Marilyn Frye, Force and Meaning. In: The Journal of Philosophy 70, S. 281–94.

    Google Scholar 

  113. (1970): Gottfried Gabriel, G. Frege über semantische Eigenschaften der Dichtung. In: Linguistische Berichte 8, 1970, S. 10–17.

  114. (1971): Logik und Sprachphilosophie bei Frege. Zum Verhältnis von Gebrauchssprache, Dichtung und Wissenschaft (1971). In: Gabriel 1975, S. 112–28.

  115. (1975): Fiktion und Wahrheit. Eine semantische Theorie der Literatur. (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt).

  116. (1971): Richard Gale, The Fictive Use of Language. In: Philosophy 46, S. 324–39.

    Google Scholar 

  117. (1957): T. M. Gang, Intention. In: Essays in Criticism 7, S. 175–86.

    Google Scholar 

  118. (1971): Joan Safran Ganz, Rules. A Systematic Study. The Hague/Paris.

  119. (1964/65): Sidney Gendin, The Artist's Intentions. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 23, S. 193–96.

    Google Scholar 

  120. (1963): Brewster Ghiselin, Automatism, Intention, and Autonomy in the Novelist's Production. In: Daedalus 92, S. 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  121. (1971): Mitchell Ginsberg, How to Say It and Mean It. In: Philosophical Studies 22, S. 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  122. (1975): Klaus Gloy, Sprachnormen I. Linguistische und soziologische Analysen. (Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt).

  123. (1960): Ernst H. Gombrich, Kunst und Illusion. Zur Psychologie der bildlichen Darstellung (Art and Illusion, 1960). Köln (1967).

  124. (1961): T. A. Goudge, The Genetic Fallacy. In: Synthese 13, S. 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  125. (1980): Günter Graf, Sprechakttheorie und Poetischer Dialog, Methodenansatz zur Drameninterpretation. In: Wirkendes Wort 30, S. 206–222.

    Google Scholar 

  126. (1968/69): H. O. Green, Intentions and Speech Acts. In: Analysis 29, S. 109–12.

    Google Scholar 

  127. (1975): Günther Grewendorf, Argumentation und Interpretation. Wissenschaftstheoretische Untersuchungen am Beispiel germanistischer Lyrikinterpretationen. Kronberg/Ts.

  128. (1977): Something New About J. L. Austin? Review Article on I. Berlin et al., Essays on J. L. Austin. In: Studies in Language 1, S. 423–36.

    Google Scholar 

  129. (1979): Sprechakttheorie und Semantik. (Frankfurt am Main).

  130. (1957): H. Paul Grice, Intendieren, Meinen, Bedeuten (Meaning, 1957). In: Meggle (Hrg.) 1979, S. 2–15.

  131. (1968): Sprecher-Bedeutung, Satz-Bedeutung, Wort-Bedeutung (Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning, 1968). In: Meggle (Hrg.) 1979, S. 85–111.

  132. (1969): Sprecher-Bedeutung und Intention (Utterer's Meaning and Intentions, 1969). In: Meggle (Hrg.) 1979, S. 16–51.

  133. (1975): Logik und Konversation (Logic and Conversation, 1975). In: Meggle (Hrg.) 1979, S. 243–65.

  134. (1978): Further Notes on Logic and Conversation. In: Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 9.

  135. (1970): Norbert Groeben, Die Kommunikativität moderner deutscher Lyrik. In: Sprache im Technischen Zeitalter 34, 1970, S. 192–214.

    Google Scholar 

  136. (1972): Literaturpsychologie. Literaturwissenschaft zwischen Hermeneutik und Empirie. Stuttgart.

  137. (1977): Rezeptionsforschung als empirische Literaturwissenschaft. Paradigma- und Methodendiskussion an Untersuchungsbeispielen. Kronberg/Ts.

  138. (1972/73): William Haas, Meanings and Rules. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 73, S. 135–55.

    Google Scholar 

  139. (1979): Paul J. Haanstad, The Communication-Intention Theory of Meaning. In: Encyclia 56, S. 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  140. (1970): C. L. Hamblin, Fallacies. (London).

  141. (1971): D. W. Hamlyn, Unconscious Intentions. In: Philosophy 46, S. 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  142. (1970): Miachel Hancher, The Science of Interpretation, and the Art of Interpretation. In: Modern Language Notes 85, S. 791–802.

    Google Scholar 

  143. (1971/72a): [Rez.:] Beardsley, Monroe C. ‘The Possibility of Criticism’ [...]. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art of Criticism 30, S. 391–94.

    Google Scholar 

  144. (1971/72b): The Extensional Fallacy: Comment on Rosemarie Maier. In: College English 33, S. 343–45.

    Google Scholar 

  145. (1972): Three Kinds of Intention. In Modern Language Notes 87, S. 827–51.

    Google Scholar 

  146. (1972/73a): Poems Versus Trees: The Aesthetic of Monroe Beardsley. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31, S. 181–91.

    Google Scholar 

  147. (1972/73b): [Rez.:] Thorpe, James. Principles of Textual Criticism [...]. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31, S. 414–15.

    Google Scholar 

  148. (1974/75): Understanding Poetic Speech Acts College English 36, S. 632–39.

    Google Scholar 

  149. (1977): Beyond a Speech-Act Theory of Lite Discourse. In: Modern Language Notes 92, S. 1081–98.

    Google Scholar 

  150. 1977/78: Describing and Interpreting as Speech Acts. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36, S. 483–85.

    Google Scholar 

  151. (1979): The Classification of Cooperative Illocutionary Acts. In: Language in Society 8, S. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  152. (1981): What Kind of Speech Act Is Interpretati In: Poetics 10, S. 263–81.

    Google Scholar 

  153. (1970): Richard M. Hare, Meaning and Speech Acts. In: Philosophical Review 79, S. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  154. (1974): Gilbert H. Harman, [Rez.:] Meaning. Stephen R. Schiffer [...]. In: The Journal of Philosophy 71, S. 224–29.

    Google Scholar 

  155. (1978): Gisela Harras, Kommunikative Handlungskonzepte oder Eine Möglichkeit, Handlungsabfolgen als Zusammenhänge zu erklären, exemplarisch an Theatertexten. Tübingen.

  156. (1961): H. L. A. Hart, Der Begriff des Rechts (The Concept of Law, 1961) (Frankfurt am Main 1973).

  157. (1955): P. L. Heath, Intentions. In: Aristotelian Society. Supplementary Vol. 29, S. 131–46.

    Google Scholar 

  158. (1974): Peter Heath (ed.), The Philosopher's Alice. London.

  159. (1973): Klaus W. Hempfer, Gattungstheorie. München (1973).

  160. (1975/76): Göran Hermerén, Intention and Interpretation in Literary Criticism. In: New Literary History 7, S. 57–82.

    Google Scholar 

  161. (1978): Paul Hernadi (ed.), What Is Literature? Bloomington/London.

  162. (1960a): Eric Donald Hirsch, Jr., Objektive Interpretation (Objective Interpretation, 1960). In: Hirsch 1967, S. 263–300.

  163. (1960b): Wordsworth and Schelling: A Typological Study of Romanticism. Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  164. (1965): Gadamers Theorie der Interpretation (Gadamer's Theory of Interpretation, 1965). In: Hirsch 1967, S. 301–320.

  165. (1967): Prinzipien der Interpretation (Validity in Interpretation, 1967). München (1972).

  166. (1968): Evaluation as Knowledge (1968), In: Hirsch 1976a, S. 95–109.

  167. (1969): The Norms of Interpretation — A Brief Response. In: Genre 2, S. 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  168. (1970): Faulty Perspectives (1970). In: Hirsch 1976a, S. 36–49.

  169. (1972): Three Dimensions of Hermeneutics (1972). In: Hirsch 1976a, S. 74–92.

  170. (1975a): Old and New Hermeneutics (1975). In: Hirsch 1976a- S. 17–35.

  171. (1975b): Stylistics and Synonymity (1975). In: Hirsch 1976a, S. 50–73.

  172. (1976a): The Aims of Interpretation. Chicago and London.

  173. (1976b): Introduction: Meaning and Significance. In: Hirsch 1976a, S. 1–13.

  174. (1976c): Some Aims of Criticism. In: Hirsch 1976a, S. 124–45.

  175. (1976d): Afterword: Knowledge and Value. In: Hirsch 1976a, S. 146–58.

  176. (1978): What Isn't Literature. In: Hernadi (ed.) 1978, S. 24–34.

  177. (1958): Friedrich Hölderlin, Sämtliche Werke. Bd. 3. Hrg. von Friedrich Beißner. Stuttgart 1958, S. 426.

  178. (1969/70): Homer Hogan, Hermeneutics and Folk Songs. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 28, S. 223–29.

    Google Scholar 

  179. (1964): David Holdcroft, Bedeutung und Illokutionshandlungen. In: Ratio 6, S. 112–25 (mit „revisions“ in der englischen Fassung in Parkinson [ed.] 1968, S. 166–81).

  180. (1978): Words and Deeds. Problems in the Theory of Speech Acts. Oxford.

  181. (1967): V. M. Hope Alston and Philosophy of Language. In: Inquiry 10, S. 327–36.

    Google Scholar 

  182. (1950): John Hospers, Meaning and Free Will. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 10, S. 307–30.

    Google Scholar 

  183. (1954/55): The Concept of Artistic Expression Proceedings of the Aritotelian Society 55, S. 313–44.

    Google Scholar 

  184. (1960/61): Implied Truth in Literature. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 19, S. 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  185. (1974): Graham Hough, An Eighth Typ of Ambiguity (1974). In: Newton-de Molina (ed.) 1976, S. 222–41.

  186. (1978): David Couzens Hoy, The Critical Circle. Literature, History, and Philosophical Hermeneutics. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London.

  187. (1969): Robert D. Hume, The Personal Heresy in Criticism. In: The British Journal of Aesthetics 9, S. 387–406.

    Google Scholar 

  188. (1954/55): Isabel Creed Hungerland, The Interpretation of Poetry. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 13 (1954/55), S. 351–359.

    Google Scholar 

  189. (1955): The Concept of Intention in Criticism. The Journal of Philosophy 52 (1955), S. 733–42.

    Google Scholar 

  190. (1958): Poetic Discourses. Berkeley/Los Angeles (= University of California Publications in Philosophy. Vol. 33).

  191. (1968): John Huntley, A Practical Look at E. D. Hirsch's ‘Validity in Interpretation’. In: Genre 1, S. 242–55.

    Google Scholar 

  192. (1656): Christian Huygens, De Saturni luna observatio nova (1656). In Œuvres complètes de Christian Huygens. Publiées par la Société Hollandaise des Sciences. Tome Quinzième. La Hay 1925, S. 171–177.

  193. (1659): Systema Saturnium, sive de causi mirandorum Saturni phaenomenôn, et comite ejus planeta novo (1659). In: Œuvres complètes [...]. La Haye 1925, S. 209–353.

  194. (1977/78): Alec Hyslop, Grice Without an Audience. In: Analysis 38, S. 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  195. (1966/67): Gary Iseminger, Uses, Regularities, and Rules. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 67, S. 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  196. (1975/76): Wolfgang Iser, The Reality of Fiction. In: New Literary History 7, S. 7–38.

    Google Scholar 

  197. (1977): Uwe Japp, Hermeneutik. Der theoretische Diskurs, die Literatur und die Konstruktion ihres Zusammenhangs in den philologischen Wissenschaften. München.

  198. (1977): Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, A Critique of Wayne C. Booth's ‘A Rhetoric of Irony’. In: Orbis Litterarum 32, S. 173–95.

    Google Scholar 

  199. (1965): John J. Jenkins, Motive and Intention. In: The Philosophical Quarterly 15, S. 155–64.

    Google Scholar 

  200. (1964): Huw Morris Jones, The Relevance of the Artist's Intentions. In: The British Journal of Aesthetics 4, S. 139–45.

    Google Scholar 

  201. (1971): Peter D. Juhl, Intention and Literary Interpretation. In: DVjs 45, S. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  202. (1973): Zur Interpretation eines literarisc Werks und ihrer Begrenzung durch die Anschauungen seines Autors. In: LiLi. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 3, S. 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  203. (1975): The Doctrine of „Verstehen“ and the Objectivity of Literary Interpretations. In: DVjs 49, S. 381–424 (auch in Juhl 1980a, S. 239–300).

    Google Scholar 

  204. (1976): Can the Meaning of a Literary Work Change? In: A. P. Foulkes (ed.), The Uses of Criticism. Bern/Frankfurt am Main, S. 133–56.

  205. (1977): Can We Exclude an Interpretation of a Literary Work on the Basis of the Rules of the Language? In: Modern Language Notes 92, S. 1044–48.

    Google Scholar 

  206. (1977/78): The Appeal to the Text: What Are We Appealing to? In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36, S. 277–87 (auch in Juhl 1980a, S. 66–89).

    Google Scholar 

  207. (1980a): Interpretation. An Essay in the Philosophy of Literary Criticism. Princeton/N.J.

  208. (1980b): Life, Literature, and the Implied Author. In: DVjs 54, S. 177–203 (auch in Juhl 1980a, S. 153–95).

    Google Scholar 

  209. (1948): Abraham Kaplan and Ernst Kris, Aesthetic Ambiguity. In: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8, S. 415–35 (gekürzt deutsch in Mechthild Curtius [Hrg.], Seminar: Theorien der künstlerischen Produktivität. [Frankfurt am Main 1976] S. 92–116).

    Google Scholar 

  210. (1979): Andreas Kemmerling, Was Grice mit „Meinen“ meint. In: Grewendorf (Hrg.) 1979, S. 67–118.

  211. (1980): How Many Things Must a Speaker Intend (Before He Is Said to Have Meant). In: Erkenntnis 15, S. 333–41.

    Google Scholar 

  212. (1964): John Kemp, The Work of Art and the Artist's Intentions. In: The British Journal of Aesthetics 4 (1964), S. 146–55.

    Google Scholar 

  213. (1964): W. E. Kennick, Interpreting Works of Art. In: Kennick (ed.) 1964, S. 498–509.

  214. (ed.) (1964): Art und Philosophy. Readings in Aesthetics. New York (1964) 1976.

  215. (1963): Anthony Kenny, Action, Emotion, and Will. London.

  216. (1974): Theodore Kisiel (with Galen Johnson), New Philosophies of Science in the U.S.A. A Selective Survey. In: Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 5, S. 139–91.

    Google Scholar 

  217. (1974): Sørup Kjørup, George Inness and the Battle Hastings, or Doing Things With Pictures. In: The Monist 58, S. 216–35.

    Google Scholar 

  218. (1978): Pictorial Speech Acts. In: Erkenntnis 12, S. 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  219. (1979): Wolfang Klein und Ulrich Nassen, Textlinguistik und Texthermeneutik. In: Nassen (Hrg.) 1979, S. 23–36.

  220. (1970): Ernst-Wilhelm Kohls, Einen Autor besser verstehen, als er sich selbst verstanden hat. In: Theologische Zeitschrift 26, S. 321–337.

    Google Scholar 

  221. (1972): Kann ein Autor besser verstanden werden, als er sich selbst verstand? In: Theologische Zeitschrift 28, S. 125–43.

    Google Scholar 

  222. (1957): Heinz Kohut, Thomas Manns ‘Tod in Venedig’. Zerfall einer künstlerischen Sublimierung („Death in Venice“ by Thomas Mann. A Story About the Disintegration of Artistic Sublimation, 1957). In: Id., Introspektion, Empathie und Psychoanalyse. Aufsätze zur psychoanalytischen Theorie, zu Pädagogik und Forschung und zur Psychologie der Kunst. (Frankfurt am Main 1977) S. 173–94.

  223. (1960): Richard Kuhns, Criticism and the Problem of Intention. In: The Journal of Philosophy 57, S. 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  224. (1973): Semantics for Literary Languages. In New Literary History 4, S. 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  225. (1973): Edward Larissy, ‘The Intentional Fallacy’. In: Essays in Criticism 23, S. 212–15.

    Google Scholar 

  226. (1972): Roy Lawrence, ‘Motive’ and ‘Intention’. An Essay in the Appreciation of Action. Evanston.

  227. (1954): F. W. Leakey, Intention in Metaphor. In: Essays in Criticism 4, S. 191–98.

    Google Scholar 

  228. (1967): Francis Noel Lees, The Keys Are at the Palace. A Note on Criticism and Biography. In: Damon (ed.) 1967, S. 135–49.

  229. (1979): Thomas Leithäuser und Birgit Volmerg, Anleitung zur empirischen Hermeneutik. Psychoanalytische Textinterpretation als sozialwissenschaftliches Verfahren. (Frankfurt am Main).

  230. (1971): Stanisław Lem, Die vollkommene Leere (poln. 1971). (Frankfurt am Main 1981).

  231. (1976): Edward A. Levenston, Metaphor, Speech Act and Grammatical Form. In: Poetics 5, S. 373–82.

    Google Scholar 

  232. (1969): David Lewis, Konventionen (Convention, 1969). Berlin 1975.

  233. (1976/77): Richard W. Lind, Must the Critic Be Correct? In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35, S. 445–56.

    Google Scholar 

  234. (1973): Hannelore Link, ‘Die Appellstruktur der Texte’ und ein ‘Pardigmawechsel in der Literaturwissenschaft’? In: Jahrbuch der deutschen Schillergesellschaft 17, S. 532–83.

    Google Scholar 

  235. (1975): Ina Loewenberg, Intentions: The Speaker and the Artist. In: The British Journal of Aesthethics 15, S. 40–49.

    Google Scholar 

  236. (1972): Jurij M. Lotman, Die Analyse des poetischen Textes (russ. 1972). Kronberg/Ts. 1975.

  237. (1971/72a): Colin Lyas, Aesthetic and Personal Qualities. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72, S. 171–93.

    Google Scholar 

  238. (1971/72b): Personal Qualities and the Intentional Fallacy. In: Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures. Vol. 6, S. 194–210.

    Google Scholar 

  239. (1958): Alasdair C. MacIntyre, Das Unbewußte. Eine Begriffsanalyse (The Unconscious. A Conceptual Analysis, 1958). (Frankfrut am Main 1968).

  240. (1975): Dorothy Mack, Metaphoring as Speech Act: Some Happiness Conditions for Implicit, Similes and Simple Metaphors. In: Poetics 4, S. 221–56.

    Google Scholar 

  241. (1978): G. B. Madison, Kritik an Hirschs Begriff der ‘Richtigkeit’. In: Hans-Georg Gadamer und Gottfried Boehm (Hrg.), Seminar: Die Hermeneutik und die Wissenschaften. (Frankfurt am Main) S. 393–425.

  242. (1977): Robert R. Magliola, Phenomenology and Literature. An Introduction. West Lafayette/Ind.

  243. (1970/71): Rosemarie Maier, ‘The Intentional Fallacy’ and the Logic of Literary Criticism. In: College English 32, S. 135–45.

    Google Scholar 

  244. (1971/72): Intention, Extension, and Interpretation: Reply to Michael Hancher. In: College English 33, S. 345–48.

    Google Scholar 

  245. (1965): Maurice Mandelbaum, Family Resemblances and Generalization Concerning the Arts. In: The American Philosophical Quarterly 2, S. 219–28.

    Google Scholar 

  246. (1981): Uri Margolin, On the ‘Vagueness’ of Critical Concepts. In: Poetics 10, S. 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  247. (1962): Joseph Margolis (ed.), Philosophy Looks at the Arts. New York.

  248. (1965): The Language of Art Criticism. Analytical Questions in Aesthetics. Detroit.

  249. (1968): [Rez.:] E. D. Hirsch, Validity in Interpretation [...]. In: Shakespeare-Studies 4, S. 407–14.

  250. (1971): Critics an Literature. In: The British Journal of Aesthetics 11, S. 369–84.

  251. (1972/73): Meaning, Speaker's Intentions, and Speech Acts. In: The Review of Metaphysics 26, S. 681–95.

  252. (1977/78): [Rez.:] Pratt, Mary Louise. Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse [...]. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36, S. 225–28.

  253. (1978): Philosophy Looks at the Arts. Contemporary Readings in Aesthetics. Revised Edition. Philadelphia.

  254. (1979): Literature and Speech Acts. Philosophy and Literature 3, S. 39–52.

  255. (1980): Art und Philosophy. (Brigthon).

  256. (1972): Ausoni Marras (ed.), Intentionality, Mind, and Language. Urbana/Chicago/London.

  257. (1967): Robert Marsh, Historical Interpretation and the History of Criticism. In: Damon (ed.) 1967, S. 1–24.

  258. (1977/78): Robert J. Matthews, Describing and Interpreting a Work of Art. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36, S. 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  259. (1972): Norbert Mecklenburg, Kritisches Interpretieren. Untersuchungen zur Theorie der Literaturkritik. (München).

  260. (1976): Georg Meggle und Manfred Beetz, Interpretationstheorie und Interpretationspraxis. Kronberg/Ts.

  261. (1979): Georg Meggle, Eine kommunikative Handlung verstehen. In: Grewendorf (Hrg.) 1979, S. 13–66.

  262. (Hrg.) (1979): Handlung, Kommunikation, Bedeutung. (Frankfurt am Main).

  263. (1981): Allgemeine Theorie der Kommunikation. Berlin/New York.

  264. (1970): Jack W. Meiland, The Nature of Intention. London.

  265. (1978): Interpretation as a Cognitive Discipline. In: Philosophy and Literature 2, S. 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  266. (1974): Wacław Mejbaum, Marxism and Genetic Analysis. In: The Polish Sociological Bulletin, No. 1 (29), 1974 S. 47–58 (mit anschließender Diskussion).

  267. (1971): Peter Mew, Conventions on Thin Ice. In: The Philosophical Quarterly 21, S. 352–56.

    Google Scholar 

  268. (1969): Jon Moline, An Approach to the Analysis of Rules. In: Theoria 35, S. 168–82.

    Google Scholar 

  269. (1973): D. C. Muecke, The Communication of Verbal Irony. In: Journal of Literary Semantics 2, S. 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  270. (1979): Ulrich Nassen, Statt einer Einleitung: Notizen zur philologischen Hermeneutik. In: Nassen (Hrg.) 1979, S. 9–22.

  271. (Hrg.) (1979): Texthermeneutik. Aktualität, Geschichte, Kritik. Paderborn.

  272. (1972/73): Daniel Nathan, Categories and Intentions. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31, S. 539–41.

    Google Scholar 

  273. (1972/73): Leonard Nathan, [Rez.:] Palmer, Richard E., Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer [...]. In: Foundations of Language 9, S. 262–67.

    Google Scholar 

  274. (1971): Manfred Naumann, Autor — Adressat — Leser. In: Weimarer Beiträge 17, H. 11, S. 163–69.

    Google Scholar 

  275. (1976): David Newton-de Molina (ed.), On Literary Intention. Critical Essays. Edingburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  276. (1976): Introduction. In: Newton-de Molina (ed.) 1976, S. i–xviii.

  277. (1981): Neal R. Norrick, Nondirect Speech Acts and Double Binds. In: Poetics 10, S. 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  278. (1968): Anthony David Nuttall, Did Meursault Mean to Kill the Arab? — The Intentional Fallacy Fallacy. In: Critical Quarterly 10, S. 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  279. (1971a): Richard Ohmann, Speech Acts and the Definition of Literature. In: Philosophy and Rhetoric 4, S. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  280. (1971b): Speech, Action, and Style. In: Seymour Chatman (ed.), Literary Style: A Symposium. London/New York, S. 241-54.

  281. (1973): Speech, Literature, and the Space Between. In: New Literary History 4, S. 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  282. (1967): James Willard Oliver, Formal Fallacies and Other Invalid Arguments. In: Mind 76, S. 463–78.

    Google Scholar 

  283. (1973): Stein Haugom Olson, Authorial Intention. In: The British Journal of Aesthetics 13, S. 219–31.

    Google Scholar 

  284. (1976/77): Defining a Literary Work. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 35, S. 133–42.

    Google Scholar 

  285. (1977): Interpretation and Intention. In: The British Journal of Aesthetics 17, S. 210–18.

    Google Scholar 

  286. (1978): The Structure of Literary Understanding. Cambridge.

  287. (1940): Horst Oppel, Grundfragen der literaturhistorischen Biographie. In: DVjs 18, S. 139–72.

    Google Scholar 

  288. (1969): Richard E. Palmer, Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Evanston.

  289. (1968): G. H. R. Parkinson (ed.), The Theory of Meaning. Oxford.

  290. (1955): John A. Passmore, Intentions. In: Aristotelian Society. Supplementary Vol. 29, S. 131–46.

    Google Scholar 

  291. (1975): Gerhard Pasternack, Theoriebildung in der Literaturwissenschaft. Einführung in Grundfragen des Interpretationspluralismus. München.

  292. (1964): Geoffrey Payzant, Intention and the Achievement of the Artist. In: Dialogue 3, S. 153–59.

    Google Scholar 

  293. (1967a): Morse Peckham, Literary Interpretation as Conventionalized Verbal Behaviour. In: Peckham 1970, S. 341–70.

    Google Scholar 

  294. (1967b): Theory of Criticism. In: Peckham 1970, S. 371–393.

  295. (1968a): Semantic Autonomy and Immanent Meaning. In: Genre 1, S. 190–94.

    Google Scholar 

  296. (1968b): The Intentional? Fallacy? (1968). I Peckham 1970, S. 421–44 (auch in Newton-de Molina [ed.] 1976, S. 139–157).

    Google Scholar 

  297. (1969): On the Historical Interpretation of Literature (1969). In: Peckham 1970, S. 445–50.

  298. (1970): The Triumph of Romanticism. Collected Essays. Columbia/S.C. (1970)21971.

  299. (1971): Reflections on the Foundations of Modern Textual Editing. In: Proof 1, S. 122–55.

    Google Scholar 

  300. (1980): Samuel Pepys, Tagebuch. Ausgewählt, übersetzt und herausgegeben von Helmut Winter. Suttgart.

  301. (1974): Karl Ludwig Pfeiffer, Sprachtheorie, Wissenschaftstheorie und das Problem der Textinterpretation. Untersuchungen am Beispiel des ‘New Criticism’ und Paul Valérys. Amsterdam.

  302. (1963): M. H. Pirenne, Les lois de l'optique et la liberté de l'artists. In: Journal de psychologie normale et pathologique 60, S. 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  303. (1968): Renato Poggioli, The Theory of Avante-Garde. Translated from the Italian by Gerald Fitzgerald. Cambridge/Mass.

  304. (1977): Mary Louise Pratt, Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse. Bloomington/London.

  305. (1977/78): Peter J. Rabinowitz, Truth in Fiction: A Reexamination of Audiences. In: Critical Inquiry 4, S. 121–41.

    Google Scholar 

  306. (1972): Paul Ramsey, A Question of Judgement: Wimsatt on Intent. In: Essays in Criticism 22, S. 408–16.

    Google Scholar 

  307. (1980): Francois Récanati, Some Remarks on Explicit Performatives, Indirect Speech Acts, Locutionary Meaning and Truth-value. In: John R. Searle, Ferenc Kiefer, and Manfred Bierwisch (eds.), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Dordrect/Boston/London (= Synthese Language Library. Vol. 10).

  308. (1957): Theodore Redpath, The Meaning of a Poem (1957). In: Newton-de Molina (ed.) 1976, S. 14–25.

  309. (1968/69): John F. Reichert, Description and Interpretation in Literary Criticism. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 27, S. 281–92.

    Google Scholar 

  310. (1971/72): Monroe Beardsley and the Shape of Literary Theory. In: College English 33, S. 558–70.

    Google Scholar 

  311. (1977): Making Sense of Literature. Chicago/London.

  312. (1971/72): H. M. Richmond, The Dead Albatross: ‚New Criticism‘ as a Humanistic Fallacy, In: College English, 33, S. 515–31.

    Google Scholar 

  313. (1960): Thomas J. Roberts, Is ‚The Intentional Fallacy‘ an Operational Concept? In: Cairo Studies in English 1960, S. 119–37.

    Google Scholar 

  314. (1977/78): Jenefer Robinson, The Eliminability of Artistic Acts. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36, S. 81–89.

    Google Scholar 

  315. (1970): Allan Rodway, The Truths of Ficition. London.

  316. (1966): Emilio Roma III, The Scope of the Intentional Fallacy (1966). In: Newton-de Molina (ed.) 1976, S. 74–86.

  317. (1977): Mark Roskill, On the ‚Intention‘ and ‚Meaning‘ of Works. In: The British Journal of Aesthetics 17, S. 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  318. (1962): William Leonard Rowe, The Fallacy of Composition. In: Mind 71, S. 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  319. (1979): Peter Rusterholz, Zum Problem des adäquaten Textverstehens. In: Ulrich Nassen (Hrg.), Studien zur Entwicklung einer materialen Hermeneutik. München, S. 234–53.

  320. (1973): Wesley C. Salmon, Logic. Second Edition. englewood Cliffs/N.J. (1963) 1973.

  321. (1976): Robert E. Sanders, In Defense of Speech Acts. In: Philosophy and Rhetoric 9, S. 112–15.

    Google Scholar 

  322. (1974): Eike von Savigny, Die Philosophie der normalen Sprache. Eine kritische Einführung in die „ordinary language philosophy“. Völlig neu bearbeitete Ausgabe. (Frankfurt am Main).

  323. (1976): Argumentation in der Literaturwissenschaft. Wissenschaftstheoretische Untersuchungen zur Lyrikinterpretation. München.

  324. (1968/69): Anthony Savile, The Place of Intention in the Concept of Art. In: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69, S. 101–23.

    Google Scholar 

  325. (1972): Stephen R. Schiffer, Meaning. Oxford.

  326. (1958): Edith Watson Schipper, Intention and Appreciation. In: The Journal of Philosophy 55, S. 128–29.

    Google Scholar 

  327. (1968): Franz Schmidt, Die Empirie in der philologischen Interpretation. In: DVjs 42, S. 117–25.

    Google Scholar 

  328. (1973): Helmut Schnelle, Sprachphilosophie und Linguistik. (Reinbek bei Hamburg).

  329. (1975): Joachim Schulte, Nachwort des Ubersetzers. In: John L. Austin, Wort und Bedeutung. München, S. 343–60 und S. 392–95.

  330. (1979): Robert A. Schultz, Analogues of Argument in Fictional Naratives. In: Poetics 8, S. 231–44.

    Google Scholar 

  331. (1965): John R. Searle, Was ist ein Sprechakt? (What is a Speech Act?, 1965). In: Matthias Schirn (Hrg.), Sprachhandlung — Existenz — Wahrheit. Hauptthemen der sprachanalytischen Philosophie. (Stutgart-Bad Cannstatt), S. 33–53.

  332. (1968): Austin or Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts. In: Philosophical Review 77, S. 405–24.

    Google Scholar 

  333. (1969): Sprechakte. Ein sprachphilosophischer Essay (Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, 1969). (Frankfurt am Main 1971).

  334. (1975a): A Classification of Illocutionary Acts. In: Language and Society 5, S. 1–23 (auch u.d.T.: A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts. In: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 7. S. 344–69).

    Google Scholar 

  335. (1975b): The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse. In: New Literary History 6, S. 619–32.

    Google Scholar 

  336. (1975c): Indirect Speech Acts. In: Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3, S. 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  337. (1977): Reiterating the Differences: A Reply to Derrida. In: Glyph 1, S. 198–208.

    Google Scholar 

  338. (1967/68): Ingo Seidler, The Iconolatric Fallacy: On the Limitations of the Internal Method of Criticism. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26, S. 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  339. (1952): Friedrich Sengle, Zum Problem moderner Dichterbiographie. In: DVjs 26, S. 100–11.

    Google Scholar 

  340. (1974/75): Gary Shapiro, Intention and Interpretation: A Semiotic Analysis. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33, S. 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  341. (1975): Edward S. Shirley, The Impossibility of a Speech Act Theory of Meaning. In: Philosophy and Rhetoric 8, S. 114–22.

    Google Scholar 

  342. (1970): Robert K. Shope, Freud on Conscious and Unconscious Intentions. In: Inquiry 13, S. 149–59.

    Google Scholar 

  343. (1967): Frederick A. Siegler, Unconscious Intentions. In: Inquiry 10, S. 251–67.

    Google Scholar 

  344. (1972): Guy Sircello, Mind and Art. An Essay on the Varieties of Expression. Princeton.

  345. (1978): Mary Sirridge, Artistic Intention and Critical Prerogative. In: The British Journal of Aesthetics 18, S. 137–54.

    Google Scholar 

  346. (1969): Quentin Skinner, Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. In: History and Theory 8, S. 3–53.

    Google Scholar 

  347. (1970): Conventions and the Understanding of Speech Acts. In: The Philosophical Quarterley 20, S. 118–38.

    Google Scholar 

  348. (1971): On Performing and Explaining Linguistic Actions. In: The Philosophical Quarterly 21, S. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  349. (1971/72): Motives, Intentions and the Interpretation of Texts (1971/72). Uberarbeitete Fassung. In: Newton-de Molina (ed.) 1976, S. 210–21.

  350. (1974): Some Problems in the Analysis of Political Thought and Action. In: Political Theory 2, S. 277–303.

    Google Scholar 

  351. (1975/76): Hermeneutics and the Role of History. In: New Literay History 7, S. 209–32.

    Google Scholar 

  352. (1971): Barbara Herrnstein Smith, Poetry as Fiction. In: New Literary History 2, S. 259–81.

    Google Scholar 

  353. (1948): R. Jack Smith, Intention in an Organic Theory of Poetry. In: Sewanee Review 56, S. 625–33.

    Google Scholar 

  354. (1967): F. E. Sparshott, The Concept of Criticism. An Essay. Oxford.

  355. (1948/49): Robert Wooster Stallman, A Note on Intentions. In: College English 10, S. 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  356. (1950): L. Susan Stebbing, A Modern Introduction to Logic. London 1950.

  357. (1977/78): Michael Steig, The Intentional Phallus: Determining Verbal Meaning in Literature. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36, S. 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  358. (1974): Horst Steinmetz, Rezeption und Interpretation. Versuch einer Abgrenzung. In: Amsterdamer Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik 3, S. 37–81.

    Google Scholar 

  359. (1962): Charles L. Stevenson, On the Reason That Can Be Given for the Interpretation of a Poem. In: Margolis (ed.) 1962, S. 121–39.

  360. (1973): Peter Frederick Strawson, Austin and ‚Locutionary Meaning‘. In: Berlin et al. 1973, S. 46–68.

  361. (1970): Joseph Strelka und Walter Hinderer (Hrg.), Moderne amerikanische Literaturtheorien. (Frankfurt am Main).

  362. (1978): Joseph Strelka, Methodologie der Literaturwissenschaft. Tübingen.

  363. (1972): Ronald Tanaka, Action and Meaning in Literary Theory. In: Journal of Literary Semantics 1, S. 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  364. (1973): The Concept of Irony: Theory and Practice. In: Journal of Literary Semantics 2, S. 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  365. (1962): I. Thalberg, Intending the Impossible. In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40, S. 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  366. (1965): James Thorpe, The Aesthetics of Textual Criticism (1965). In: Thorpe 1972a, S. 3–49.

  367. (1969): The Ideal of Textual Criticism (1969). In: Thorpe 1972a, S. 50–79.

  368. (1972a): Principles of Textual Criticism. San Marino/Cal.

  369. (1972b): The Treatment of Accidentals. In: Thorpe 1972a, S. 131–70.

  370. (1972c): The Establishment of the Text. In: Thorpe 1972a, S. 171–202.

  371. (1939): Eustace M. W. Tillyard and Clive S. Lewis, The Personal Heresy. A Controversy (1939). London/New York/Toronto (1965).

  372. (1977): Manfred Titzmann, Strukturale Textanalyse. Theorie und Praxis der Interpretation. München.

  373. (1978): D. D. Todd, [Rez.:] Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse, by Mary Louise Pratt [...]. In: Philosophy and Literature 2, S. 269–71.

    Google Scholar 

  374. (1976): William Edward Tolhurst, On the Relevance of the Author's Intention to the Interpretation of Literature. The University of Connecticut, Ph.D., 1976 (University Microfilms).

  375. (1977/78): [Rez.:] David Newton-de Molina (ed.)., On Literary Intention [...]. In: The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36, S. 499–500.

    Google Scholar 

  376. (1979): On What a Text Is and How It Means. In: The British Journal of Aesthetics 19, S. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  377. (1971): Alan Tormey, The Concept of Expression. A Study in Philosophical Psychology and Aesthetics. Princeton.

  378. (1980): Jürgen Trabant, Zeichen in ästhetischen Handlungen. In: Eschbach/Rader (Hrg.) 1980, S. 85–102.

  379. (1933): Paul Valéry, Betrachtung zum ‚Cimetière marin‘ (Au sujet du ‚Cimetière marin‘, 1933). In: Id., Zur Theorie der Dichtkunst. Aufsätze und Vorträge. (Frankfurt am Main 1975), S. 176–89.

  380. (1974): F. van Ingen, Die Revolte des Lesers oder Rezeption versus Interpretation. Zu Fragen der Interpretation und der Rezeptionsästhetik. In: Amsterdamer Beiträge zur neueren Germanistik 3, S. 83–147.

    Google Scholar 

  381. (1972): Zeno Vendler, Res cogitans: An Essay in Rational Psychology. Ithaca.

  382. (1955): Eliseo Vivas, Mr. Wimsatt on the Theory of Literature. In: Comapartive Literature 7, S. 344–61.

    Google Scholar 

  383. (1952): John Wain ‚Intention‘ and Blake's ‚Jerusalem‘. In: Essays in Criticism, 2, S. 110–11.

    Google Scholar 

  384. (1946): Charles Child Walcutt, Critic's Taste or Artist's Intention? In: The University of Kansas City Review 12, S. 278–83.

    Google Scholar 

  385. (1970): Kendall L. Walton, Categories of Art. In: Philosophical Review 79, S. 334–67 (auch in Margolis [ed.] 1978, S. 88–114).

    Google Scholar 

  386. (1973): [Rez.:] The Possibility of Criticism. Monroe C. Beradsley [...]. In: The Journal of Philosophy 70, S. 832–36.

    Google Scholar 

  387. (1973/74): Categories and Intentions: A Reply. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 32, S. 267–68.

    Google Scholar 

  388. (1971): Geoffrey James Warnock, Hare on Meaning and Speech Acts. In: Philosophical Review 80, S. 80–84.

    Google Scholar 

  389. (1958): George Watson, A Modern Literary Heresy. In: The Listener 60, S. 594–96.

    Google Scholar 

  390. (1969): The Literary Past (1969). In: Newton-de Molina (ed.) 1976, S. 158–73.

  391. (1964): Morris Weitz, Hamlet and the Philosophy of Literary Criticism. New York.

  392. (1949): René Wellek und Austin Warren, Theorie der Literatur (Theory of Literature, 1949). (Frankfurt am Main 1972).

  393. (1971): Götz Wienold, Formulierungstheorie — Poetik — strukturelle Literaturgeschichte. Am Beispiel der altenglischen Dichtung. Frankfurt am Main.

  394. (1970/71): Burleigh Wilkins, Concerning ‚Motive‘ and ‚Intention‘. In: Analysis 31, S. 139–42.

    Google Scholar 

  395. (1970): N. L. Wilson, Grice on Meaning: The Ultimate Counter-example. In: Noûs 4, S. 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  396. (1942/43): William K. Wimsatt, Jr., Comment on ‚Two Essays in Practical Criticism‘. In: The University of Kansas City Review 9, S. 139–143.

    Google Scholar 

  397. (1946): William K. Wimsatt, Jr., and Monroe C. Beardsley, The Intentional Fallacy. In: Sewanee Review 54, S. 468–88.

    Google Scholar 

  398. (1947): History and Criticism. A Problematic Relationship (1947). In: Wimsatt 1954, S. 253–65.

  399. (1949): The Affective Fallacy (1949). In: Wimsatt 1954, S. 21–39 (deutsch ohne Anmerkungen in Strelka/Hinderer [Hrg.] 1970, S. 212–30).

  400. (1953): The Chicago Critics. The Fallacy of the Neoclassic Species (1953). In: Wimsatt 1954, S. 41–65.

  401. (1954): The Verbal Icon. Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. Lexington.

  402. (1954): The Intentional Fallacy. In: Wimsatt 1954, S. 3–18.

  403. (1968): Genesis: A Fallacy Revisited. In: Peter Demetz, Thomas Greene, and Lowry Nelson (ed.), The Disciplines of Criticism. Essays in Literary Theory, Interpretation and History. New Haven and London 1968, S. 193–225.

  404. (1978): William K. Wimsatt, Jr., and Monroe C. Beardsley, The Intentional Fallacy. In: Margolis (ed.) 1978, S. 293–306.

  405. (1976): John Woods and Douglas Walton, Fallaciousness Without Invalidity? In: Philosophy and Rhetoric 9, S. 52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  406. (1977): Marianne Wünsch, Zur Kritik der psychoanalytischen Textanalyse. In: Wolfgang Klein (Hrg.), Methoden der Textanalyse. Heidelberg, S. 45–60.

  407. (1972/73): Julian Young, Intentionality. In: Review of Metaphysics 26, S. 696–722.

    Google Scholar 

  408. (1960): Paul Ziff, Semantic Analysis. Ithaca/N.Y.

  409. (1967/68): On H. P. Grice's Account of Meaning (1967/68). In: Id., Understanding Understanding. Ithaca/London 1972, S. 78–89.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Literaturwissenschaftliches Seminar Universität Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 6, 2000, Hamburg B

    Lutz Danneberg (Wiss Mitarbeiter)

  2. Literaturwissenschaftliches Seminar Universität Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 6, 2000, Hamburg B

    Hans-Harald Müller

Authors
  1. Lutz Danneberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hans-Harald Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Für Teil I vgl. diese Zeitschrift Band XIV, Heft 1, S. 103 ff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Danneberg, L., Müller, HH. Der ‚intentionale Fehlschluß‘ — ein Dogma?. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 14, 376–411 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801658

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801658

Search

Navigation