Summary
To understand the present situation we must know something about its history. The ‘Rise of the West’, which grew out of the ‘European Miracle’, is a special case of cultural evolution. The development of science is an important element in this process. Cultural evolution went hand in hand with biological evolution. Evolutionary epistemology illuminates the achievements and the evolution of cognitive sensory apparatus of various species. Man's cognitive sensory apparatus is adapted to the ‘mesocosmos’, the world of medium-sized dimensions. The biological structures constitute the hardware of the cognitive sensory apparatus, while certain expectations and theories, which are ontogenetically apriori, constitute the corresponding system software. A distinction is introduced between ‘primary theories’ (linked to the sensory apparatus) and ‘secondary theories’. The latter are the result of attempts to meet the demand for an explanation of phenomena that cannot be explained in terms of ‘primary theories’. Two subsets of ‘secondary theories’ are compared: spiritualistic-personalized theories and scientific theories. From the historical point of view the scientific secondary theories are but a special subset of the class of secondary theories. From the systematic point of view it is instructive to focus on a comparison of the two subsets: what do they have in common? in what respects do they differ? The rise of scientific thinking is closely linked to the ‘European Miracle’. How (and when and why) did the West grow rich? To answer this question we must first produce an explanation of the principle: theories about the consequences of institutional arrangements. Then we can give a historical explanation of why this development took place in Europe and only there. It is claimed that the secret of success, economic wealth and the first approximations to relatively free societies, was the taming of the state, the taming of cleptocracy (independent of the nature of the agency having cleptocratic appetites, be it princes or parliaments). The taming of the state is a pre-democratic achievement. Finally, the consequences of institutional arrangements for scientific progress and innovation are examined. Only if the system is market-like, will it link individual effort with reward and, through the competitive process, encourage the wide dissemination and use of new ideas. There is no tradeoff between freedom on the one hand and economic success and the growth of scientific knowledge on the other. Freedom and the ensuing flexibility is the key to the past and to the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agazzi, E.: 1987,Philosophie, Science, Métaphysique, Editions Universitaires Fribourg Suisse, Fribourg.
Albert, H.: 1968,Traktat über kritische Vernunft, J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen; 3. verb. Aufl. 1975.
Alonso, M. (ed.): 1990,Organization and Change in Complex Systems IV, Paragon House, New York, NY.
Anderson, M. (ed.): 1986,The Unfinished Agenda. Essays on the Political Economy of Government Policy in Honor of Arthur Seldon, The Institute of Economic Affairs, London.
Andreski, St.: 1968,Military Organization and Society, University Press, Stanford.
Andreski, St.: 1969,The Uses of Comparative Sociology, University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles, CA.
Bartley, W. W., III: 1962,The Retreat to Commitment, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY: 2nd ed. 1984 with 100 pgs.Appendices, Open Court, La Salle, IL.
Bartley, W. W., III: 1987, ‘Philosophy of Biologyversus Philosophy of Physics’, in Radnitzky and Bartley, (eds.), 1987, pp. 7–46.
Brunner, K.: 1985, ‘The Poverty of Nations’,The Cato Journal 5, 37–50.
Brunner, K.: 1987a, ‘Economic Inequality and the Quest for Social Justice’,The Cato Journal 7: 153–158.
Brunner, K. 1987b, ‘The Perception of Man and the Conception of Society: Two Approaches to Understanding Society’,Economic Inquiry 25: 367–388.
Brunner, K. and Meckling, W.: 1977, ‘The Perception of Man and the Conception of Government’,Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 9: 70–85.
Brunner, K.et al.: 1986,Economics, Theology, and the Social Order (Center Symposia Series, Center for Research in Government Policy and Business, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
Buchanan, J. M.: 1986, ‘Our Times, Past, Present and Future’, in Andersson, (ed.), 1986, pp. 31–38.
Butler, E. and Pirie, M. (eds.): 1987,Hayek on the Fabric of Human Society, The Adam Smith Institute, London.
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.: 1976,Grundriß der vergleichenden Verhaltensforschung, Piper, München, 5th ed., 1978.
Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I.: 1985,Biologie des menschlichen Verhaltens, Piper, München.
Engerman, St.: 1988, ‘Reflections of How (and When and Why) the West Grew Rich’, MS for the 15th Interlaken Seminar on Analysis and Ideology, May 1988.
Flew, A.: 1985,Thinking About Social Thinking, Blackwell, Oxford.
Hayek, F. v.: 1973, 1976, 1979,Law, Legislation and Liberty, 3 Vols., Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Hayek, F. v.: 1978,New Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Hayek, F. v.: 1984, ‘The Rules of Morality are not the Conclusions of our Reason’, inCommemorative Volume of the Twelfth International Conference on the Unity of the Sciences (Chicago, 1983), New York, NY, pp. 35–42.
Hayek, F. v.: 1988,The Fatal Conceit. The Errors of Socialism (The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek, Vol. I; General Editor: W. W. Bartley, III), Routledge, London.
Heelan, P.: 1985,Space Perception and the Philosophy of Science, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Hirshleifer, J.: 1980, ‘Privacy: Its Origine, Function, and Future’,The Journal of Legal Studies 9: 649–664.
Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.): 1982,Rationality and Relativism, Blackwell, Oxford.
Horton, R.: 1982, ‘Tradition and Modernity Revisited’, in Hollis and Lukes, (eds.), 1982, pp. 201–260.
Jones, E. L.: 1981,The European Miracle: Environments, Economics, and Geopolitics in the History of Europe and Asia (2nd Edition, 1987, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kanitscheider, B.: 1988,Das Welbild Einsteins, Beck, München.
Mekler, Y.: 1986, ‘Soviet Science: How Good Is It?’,Discovery, August, 1986, pp. 35–59.
Needham, J.: 1969, ‘Science and Society in East and West’, in Needham, J., 1969,The Grand Titration, Allen & Unwin, London, Chapt. 6.
North, D. and Thomas, R.: 1972,The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Olson, M.: 1982,The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation and Social Rigidities, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
Popper, K.: 1963,Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 7th rev. ed., 1978.
Popper, K.: 1972,Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford University Press, London, 5th rev. ed., 1979.
Popper, K.: 1987, ‘Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind’, in Radnitzky and Bartley, (eds.), 1987, pp. 139–155.
Popper, K. and Eccles, J.: 1977,The Self and Its Brain. An Argument for Interactionism, Springer International, Berlin.
Rabushka, A.: 1987,The New China: Comparative Economic Development in Mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong, Pacific Research Institute, Westview, Boulder, and San Francisco.
Rabushka, A.: 1988, ‘Economic, Civil, and Political Freedoms: The Cases of Singapore and Hong Kong’, in Walker, (ed.), 1988, pp. 151–183 (followed by Discussion, pp. 184–213).
Radnitzky, G.: 1968,Contemporary Schools of Metascience, Humanities, New York, NY, rev. and enl. ed., Regnery, Chicago, 1973, from 1977 Gateway Editions, Chicago.
Radnitzky, G.: 1986,L'epistemologia di Popper e la ricerca scientifica (a cura di Angelo M. Petroni), Edizioni Borla, Roma.
Radnitzky, G.: 1987a, ‘Erkenntnistheoretische Probleme im Lichte von Evolutionstheorie und Ökonomie: Die Entwicklung von Erkenntnisapparaten und epistemischen Ressourcen’, in Riedl und Wuketits (Hg.), 1987, pp. 115–132.
Radnitzky, G.: 1987b, ‘An Economic Theory of the Rise of Civilization and Its Policy Implications: Hayek's Account Generalized’,Ordo. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 38: 47–90
Radnitzky, G.: 1987c, ‘The “Economic” Approach to the Philosophy of Science’,The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38: 159–179.
Radnitzky, G.: 1987d,Entre Wittgenstein et Popper. Détours vers la Décourverte: Le Vrai, le Faux, l'Hypothèse, Vrin, Paris.
Radnitzky, G.: 1989, ‘Wissenschaftlichkeit’, in Seiffert und Radnitzky (Hg.), 1988, pp. 399–405.
Radnitzky, G. (ed.): 1987,Centripetal Forces in the Sciences, Vol. 1.
Radnitzky, G. (ed.): 1988, Vol. 2, Paragon House Publishers, New York, NY.
Radnitzky, G. (ed.): 1990,Universal Economics: Assessment of the Achievements of the Economic Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA,forthcoming.
Radnitzky, G. and Bartley, W. W., III (eds.): 1987,Evolutionary Epistemology, Theory of Rationality, and the Sociology of Knowledge, Open Court, LaSalle, IL.
Radnitzky, G. and Bernholz, P. (eds.): 1987,Economic Imperialism: The Economic Method Applied Outside the Field of Economics, Paragon House Publishers, New York, NY.
Regnery, H.: 1979,Memoirs of a Dissident Publisher, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York and London.
Ricossa, S. e di Robilant, E. (eds.): 1985,Libertà, giustizia e persona nella società tecnologica, A. Giuffré Editore, Milano.
Riedl, R. und Wuketits, F. (Hg.): 1987,Die Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie, Paul Parey, Berlin/Hamburg.
Robilant, E. di. (ed.): 1987,Libertá e società tecnologica avanzata, Longanesi, Milano.
Rosenberg, N.: 1982,Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Rosenberg, N. and Birdzell, L.: 1986,How the West Grew Rich: The Economic Transformation of the Industrial World, Basic Books, New York, NY.
Seiffert, H. und Radnitzky, G. (Hg.): 1989,Handlexikon zur Wissenschaftstheorie, Ehrenwirth Verlag, München.
Smith, Adam: 1776,An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Strathan and Cadell, London (repr. 1937, Modern Library, New York, NY); dt.:Der Wohlstand der Nationanen. Eine Untersuchung seiner Natur und seiner Ursachen, Beck, München, 1974.
Topitsch, E.: 1958,Vom Ursprung und Ende der Metaphysik, Springer, Wien.
Topitsch, E.: 1979,Erkenntnis und Illusion, Hoffmann & Campe, Hamburg.
Vollmer, G. 1987, ‘The Unity of Science in an Evolutionary Perspective’, in Radnitzky (ed.), 1987, Chapter 10.
Waal, F. de: 1982,Chimpanzee Politics, J. Cape, London.
Wächtershäuser, G.: 1987, ‘Light and Life: On the Nutritional Origins of Sensory Perception’, in Radnitzky and Bartley (eds.), 1987, pp. 121–138.
Walker, M. A. (ed.): 1988,Freedom, democracy and Economic Welfare, The Fraser Institute, Vancouver, BC.
Weede, E.: 1985, ‘Warum bleiben arme Leute arm? Rent-seeking und Dependenz als Erklärungsgrundlage für die Armut in der Dritten Welt’,Politische Vierteljahresschrift 26: 270–286.
Weede, E.: 1987a, ‘From the Rise of the West’ to “Eurosklerosis”. Are There Lessons for the Asian-Pacific Region?’,Asian Culture 15: 1–14.
Weede, E.: 1987a, ‘Ideas, Ideological Basis and Political Culture as the Mainsprings of Politics’,in typescript.
Weede, E.: 1988, ‘Der Sonderweg des Westens’,Zeitschrift für Soziologie 17: 172–186.
Weede, E.: 1990,Wirtschaft, Staat, Gesellschaft, Mohr, Tübingen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radnitzky, G. The birth of modern science out of the ‘European Miracle’. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 21, 275–292 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801039
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01801039