Skip to main content
Log in

Summary

With the help of psychological and biological concepts it is possible todescribe adequately a fundamental class of inductive inferences that are intuitively correct. Moreover, by relying on evolutionary theories it is possible tojustify them, because they reflect innate, hence useful, capacities. These inferences, however, refer to the past, i.e. the inferred generalization is of the form “All Awere B”. The reason is that evolutionary theories only claim that innate capacitieshad survival value. With respect to inductive inferences about the future the situation is different. In particular, they are affected by the Goodman paradox. In the article, a method is proposed which enables us to describe adequately a basic class of inductive inferences about the future which are intuitively correct. These inferences can also be justified, but their justification requires a very specific assumption. The conclusions arrived at in the article can be viewed as a satisfactory solution to the Goodman paradox.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Goodman, N. 1965, Fact, Fiction, and Forecast, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill (first edition: 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1972, Problems and Projects, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunstra, B. R. 1969, “The Plausibility of the Entrenchment Concept”, American Philosophical Quarterly, Monograph No. 3. pp. 100–127.

  • Quine, W. V. 1969, “Natural Kinds”, in N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel, Dordrecht: Reidel Publ. Co., pp. 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. C. 1963, “On Vindicating Induction“, in H. E. Kyburg and E. Nagel (eds), Induction: Some Current Issues, Middletown: Wesleyan University Press, pp. 27–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemmer, N. 1971, “Three Problems in Induction”, Synthese, 23, pp. 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— 1973, An Empiricist Theory of Language Acquisition, The Hague: Mouton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabludowski, A. 1974, “Concerning a Fiction about How Facts are Forecast“, Journal of Philosophy, 71, pp. 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am indebted to Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, Allan Berger, David Hull, and Joseph S. Ullian for valuable criticism.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stemmer, N. The goodman paradox. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 6, 340–354 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01800794

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01800794

Keywords

Navigation