Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical analysis of university choice and earnings

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In this paper we analyze the relations between university choice and earnings. We estimate a model in which a choice function determines the decision to apply to a particular university and thereby the switch to a particular wage regime. The wage structures of the options in turn determine the lifetime earnings prospects associated with those options, and these prospective earnings influence university choice. The results reveal some notable differences between the wage structures of graduates from different universities. In the choice function we find that graduates from different universities differ with respect to social background, gender and the motives that they consider important in choosing a department. A test on the possibility of pooling alternatives establishes heterogeneity of departments. Finally, we find that earnings prospects are not a particularly important factor in the choice of a specific university.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Commissie Financieringsstructuur Onderzoek en Ontwikkeling, 1985,Rekenschap van creativiteit, The Hague.

  • Cramer, J.S., 1991,The LOGIT Model: An Introduction for Economists, London.

  • Cramer, J.S. and Geert Ridder, 1991, ‘Pooling States in the Multinominal Logit Model,’Journal of Econometrics, 47, pp. 267–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard, 1986, ‘Demand for Education,’ in: Orley Ashenfelter and Richard Layard (eds.),Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 1, Amsterdam.

  • Gaag, Jacques van der and Wim Vijverberg, 1988, ‘A Switching Regression Model for Wage Determinants in the Public and Private Sectors of a Developing Country,’Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, pp. 244–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garen, John, 1984, ‘The Returns to Schooling: A Selectivity Bias Approach with a Continuous Choice Variable,’Econometrica, 52, pp. 1199–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, Joop, Gerard Pfann and Geert Ridder, 1989, ‘(Non-)graduation and the Earnings Function: An Inquiry on Self-selection,’European Economic Review, 33, pp. 1373–1395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, Lawrence, Lung-Fei Lee, G.S., Maddala and Robert Trost, 1979, ‘Return to College Education: An Investigation of Self-selection Bias Based on the Project Talent Data,’International Economic Review, 20, pp. 775–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodde, David and M.A.M. Theunissen, 1985,De schoolloopbaan van snelle vwo-leerlingen, sexeongelijkheid en de keuze voor hoger onderwijs, Ministerie van Onderwijs en Wetenschappen, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Lung-Fei, 1978, ‘Unionism and Wage Rates: A Simultaneous Equations Model with Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variables,’International Economic Review, 19, pp. 415–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Lung-Fei, 1983, ‘Generalized Econometric Models with Selectivity,’Econometrica, 51, pp. 507–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manski, Charles and David Wise, 1983,College Choice in America, Cambridge Mass.

  • McFadden, Daniel, 1974, ‘Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior,’ in: P. Zarembka (ed.),Frontiers in Econometrics, New York.

  • Mincer, Jacob, 1974,Schooling, Experience, and Earning, NBER, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micklewright, John, 1989, ‘Choice at Sixteen,’Economica, 56, pp. 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterbeek, Hessel, 1990, ‘Education and Earnings in the Netherlands; An Empirical Analysis,’European Economic Review, 34, pp. 1353–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterbeek, Hessel, Joop Hartog and Joop Odink, 1990, ‘Wage Differentials between the Public and Private Sectors: An Application to Dutch Economists,’ Mimeo, University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics and Econometrics.

  • Rosen, Sherwin, 1977, ‘Human Capital: Relations between Education and Earnings,’ in: M. Intriligator (ed.),Frontiers in Quantitative Economics, Amsterdam.

  • Stewart, Mark, 1987, ‘Collective Bargaining Arrangements, Closed Shops and Relative Pay,’Economic Journal, 97, pp. 140–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trost, Robert and Lung-Fei Lee, 1984, ‘Technical Training and Earnings: A Polychotomous Choice Model with Selectivity,’Review of Economics and Statistics, 66, pp. 151–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, Robert, 1986, ‘Wage Determinants: A Survey and Reinterpretation of Human Capital Earnings Function,’ in: Orley Ashenfelter and Richard Layard (eds.),Handbook of Labor Economics, Amsterdam.

  • Willis, Robert and Sherwin Rosen, 1979, ‘Education and Self-selection,’Journal of Political Economy, 87, pp. S7-S36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oosterbeek, H., Groot, W. & Hartog, J. An empirical analysis of university choice and earnings. De Economist 140, 293–309 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01799322

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01799322

Keywords

Navigation