Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of quantitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound images

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the accuracy and reproducibility of a computer-aided method for quantification of intravascular ultrasound. The computer analysis system was developed on an IBM compatible PC/AT equipped with a framegrabber. The quantitative assessment of lumen area, lesion area and percent area obstruction was performed by tracing the boundaries of the free lumen and original lumen.

Accuracy of the analysis system was tested in a phantom study. Echographic measurements of lumen and lesion area derived from 16 arterial specimens were compared with data obtained by histology. The differences in lesion area measurements between histology and ultrasound were minimal (mean ± SD: −0.27±1.79 mm2, p>0.05). Lumen area measurements from histology were significantly smaller than those with ultrasound due to mechanical deformation of histologic specimens (−5.38±5.09 mm2, p<0.05). For comparison with angiography, 18 ultrasound cross-sections were obtainedin vivo from 8 healthy peripheral arteries. Luminal areas obtained by angiography were similar to those by ultrasound (−0.52±5.15 mm2, p>0.05). Finally, intra- and interobserver variability of our quantitative method was evaluated in measurements of 100in vivo ultrasound images. The results showed that variations in lumen area measurements were low (5%) whereas variations in lesion area and percent area obstruction were relatively high (13%, 10%, respectively).

Results of this study indicate that our quantitative method provides accurate and reproducible measurements of lumen and lesion area. Thus, intravascular ultrasound can be used for clinical investigation, including assessment of vascular stenosis and evaluation of therapeutic intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bom N, Hoff H ten, Lancée CT, Gussenhoven WJ, Bosch JG. Early and recent intraluminal ultrasound devices. Int J Card Imaging 1989; 4: 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roelandt J, Serruys PW. Intraluminal real-time ultrasonic imaging: Clinical perspectives. Int J Card Imaging 1989; 4: 89–97.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pandian NG, Weintraub A, Kreis A, Schwartz SL, Konstam MA, Salem DN. Intracardiac, intravascular, two dimensional high frequency ultrasound imaging of pulmonary artery and its branches in humans and animals. Circulation 1990; 81: 2007–12.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neville RF, Bartorelli AL, Sidawy AN, Almagor Y, Potkin B, Leon MB. Anin vivo feasibility study of intravascular ultrasound imaging. Am J Surg 1989; 158: 142–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tobis JM, Mallery JA, Gessert J, Griffith J, Mahon D, Bessen M, Moriuchi M, McRae M, Henry WL. Intravascular ultrasound cross-sectional arterial imaging before and after balloon angioplastyin vitro. Circulation 1989; 80: 873–82.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wenguang L, Gussenhoven WJ, Bosch JG, Mastik F, Reiber JHC, Bom N. A computer-aided analysis system for the quantitative assessment of intravascular ultrasound images. Computers in Cardiology 1990: 333–6.

  7. Gussenhoven EJ, Essed CE, Lancée CT, Mastik F, Frietman P, Egmond F van, Reiber J, Bosch H, Urk Hv, Roelandt J, Bom N. Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: Anin vitro study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 947–52.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Potkin BN, Bartorelli AL, Gessert JM, Neville RF, Almagor Y, Roberts WC, Leon MB. Coronary artery imaging with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 1990; 81: 1575–85.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Reiber JHC, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ. Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 1985; 71: 280–8.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; February 8: 307–10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moriuchi M, Tobis JM, Mahon D, Gessert J, Griffith J, McRae M, Moussabeck O, Henry WL. The reproducibility of intravascular ultrasound imagingin vitro. J Am Soc Echo 1990; 3: 444–50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hoff H ten, Korbijn A, Smit TH, Klinkhamer JFF, Bom N. Imaging artifacts in mechanically driven ultrasound catheters. Int J Card Imaging 1989; 4: 195–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nishimura RC, Edwards WD, Warnes CA, Reeder GS, Holmes DR, Tajik AJ, Yock PG. Intravascular ultrasound imaging:In vitro validation and pathologic correlation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 145–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dr. C.D. Mario, Div. of Cardiology, Vicenza, Italy, is the recipient of the E.S.C. Research Fellowship 1991.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wenguang, L., Gussenhoven, W.J., Zhong, Y. et al. Validation of quantitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound images. Int J Cardiac Imag 6, 247–253 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797856

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797856

Key words

Navigation