Abstract
In the present paper a simulation study on the influence of noise and source model on the accuracy of localization of the sources of biomagnetic fields is presented. Applying a statistical analysis (F test) to the localization results obtained by various models on the simulated maps calculated using different theoretical sources and different noise levels we were able to define a ‘best localization’ (BL) method. It allows an automatic determination of the particular source model able to represent in the best statistical way a specific field distribution obtaining the best source localization for that distribution. We applied this method to the localization of cardiac sources in the experimental maps of the magnetic field produced by isolated rabbit hearts completely immersed in a conductive medium. The results clearly indicate that the proposed method is very effective in determining the ‘best localization’ for every particular field distribution while the use of the same source model for every field map often produces a source localization completely in contrast with the position of cardiac structures of the isolated hearts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- BL:
-
best localization
- CME:
-
current multipole expansion
- ECD:
-
equivalent current dipole
- EMD:
-
equivalent magnetic dipole
- MCG:
-
magnetocardiographic
- SNR:
-
signal to noise ratio
- VT:
-
ventricular tachycardia
- WPW:
-
Wolff-Parkinson-White
References
Abraham-Fuchs K, Schneider S, Reichenberger H. MCG inverse solution: influence of coil size, grid size, number of coils and SNR. IEEE Trans Biom Eng 1988; 35 (8): 573.
Gonnelli RS, Agnello M. Inverse problem solution in cardiomagnetism using a current multipole expansion of the primary sources. Phys Med Biol 1987; 32 (1): 133–42.
Gonnelli RS, Sicuro M. Use of the current multipole model for the cardiac source localization in normal subjects. In: Atsumi K, Kotani M, Ueno S, Katila T, Williamson SJ, editors. Biomagnetism '87. Tokyo: Tokyo Denki Univ Press, 1988: 314–7.
Sicuro M, Gonnelli RS. Correlation between biomagnetic localization of primary cardiac sources obtained by different models and radiographic-echocardiographic images. In: Schubert E, Romberg D, editors. Electrocardiology '87. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1988: 81–4.
Katila T, Maniewski R, Mäkijärvi M, Nenonen J, Siltanen P. On the accuracy of source localization in cardiac measurements. Phys Med Biol 1987; 32 (1): 125–31.
Ernè SN, Trahms L, Trontelj Z. Current multipoles as sources of biomagnetic fields. In: Atsumi K, Kotani M, Ueno S, Katila T, Williamson SJ, editors. Biomagnetism '87. Tokyo: Tokyo Denki Univ Press, 1988: 302–5.
Katila T, Montonen J, Mäkijärvi M, Nenonen J, Raivio M, Siltanen P. Localization of the accessory cardiac conduction pathway. In: Atsumi K, Kotani M, Ueno S, Katila T, Williamson SJ, editors. Biomagnetism '87. Tokyo: Tokyo Denki Univ Press, 1988: 274–7.
Fenici RR, Melillo G. Biomagnetic imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. In: Williamson SJ, Hoke M, Stroink G, Kotani M, editors. Advances in biomagnetism. New York: Plenum Press, 1989: 409–15.
Mäkijärvi M, Nenonen J, Leiniö M, Montonen J, Mäkiniemi K, Schulman T, et al. High-resolution magnetocardiographic mapping of pre-excitation in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. In: Williamson SJ, Hoke M, Stroink G, Kotani M, editors. Advances in biomagnetism. New York: Plenum Press, 1989: 381–3.
Abramowitz M, Stegun IA, editors. Handbook of mathematical functions. New York: Dover Publications, 1970: 986–9.
Gonnelli RS, Durin GF, Sanmartino A, Rosettani E. The magnetic field of isolated rabbit heart. In: Williamson SJ, Hoke M, Stroink G, Kotani M, editors. Advances in biomagnetism. New York: Plenum Press, 1989: 393–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonnelli, R.S. Automatic model selection for the ‘best localization’ of cardiac sources. Int J Cardiac Imag 7, 185–192 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797751
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797751