Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The impact of vessel orientation in space on densitometric measurements of cross sectional areas of coronary arteries

  • Articles
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Under ideal conditions, densitometric measurement of a coronary arterial cross section in biplane angiographic images should result in nearly equal cross sectional areas for both planes. However, quite appreciable discrepancies have been found by some authors in patients. In this study, the role of inadequate spatial orientation of the vessel axes relatively to the x-rays was assessed by use of a 3D technique applied to 60 stenoses (45 pre PTCA and 15 post PTCA) in simultaneously acquired digital biplane coronary angiograms of 27 CAD patients. The 3D technique yields two radius values per projection directly in mm at any arterial cross section of interest. This was used to determine the areas Ar (in mm2) of the reference cross sections. As with catheter calibration, these cross sections were thus assumed to be more or less circular, but out-of-plane effects and errors due to a catheter diameter determination in pixels were avoided. The areas of the stenotic sections were then determined densitometrically (in mm2) from the two projections (1 and 2) according to As1=ArDs1/Dr1, resp. As2=ArDs2/Dr2, where Dr1, Dr2, Ds1 and Ds2 are the conventional densitometric areas of the reference and stenotic cross sections measured in planes 1 and 2. As expected, the areas As1 and As2 correlated only moderately: As2=0.92 As1+0.7 mm2, r=0.82, n=60, SEE=1.4 mm2. The 3D method also yielded the two spatial angles between the local vessel axis and the x-rays of both planes. These two angles were then used to correct each densitometric area for inadequate orientation. With the corrected densitometric areas As1c and As2c, the correlation improved to: As2c=1.05 As1c+0.03 mm2, r=0.93, n=60, SEE=0.8 mm2. Inadequate orientation of the cross sections in space thus appears to be an important factor of inaccuracy in densitometric measurements of stenotic cross sections in patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sandor T, Als AV, Paulin S: Cine-densitometric measurement of coronary arterial stenosis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1979; 5: 229–245.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Doriot PA, Rasoamanambelo L, Honegger HP, Mérier G, Bopp P, Rutishauser W: Measurement of the degree of coronary stenosis by digital densitometry. In ‘Computers in Cardiology 1981’, IEEE Computer Society, 1982, pp 329–332.

  3. Nichols AB, Gabrieli CFO, Fenoglio JJ, Esser PD: Quantification of relative coronary arterial stenosis by cinevideodensitometric analysis of coronary arteriograms. Circulation 1984; 69(3): 512–522.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simons MA, Bastian BV, Bray BE, Debrickson DR: Comparison of observer and videodensitometric measurements of simulated coronary artery stenoses. Invest Radiol 1987; 22: 562–568.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Silver KH, Buczek JA, Esser PD, Nichols AB: Quantitative analysis of coronary arteriograms by microprocessor cinevideodensitometry. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1987; 13: 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tobis J, Nacioglu O, Johnston WD, Qu L, Reese T, Sato D, Roeck W, Montelli S, Henry WL: Videodensitometric determination of minimum coronary artery luminal diameter before and after angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Di Mario C, Haase J, den Boer A, Reiber JHC, Serruys PW: Edge- detection versus densitometry in the quantitative assessment of stenosis phantoms: An in vivo comparison in porcine coronary arteries. Am Heart J 1992; 124: 1181–1189.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haase J, Escaned J, Montauban van Swijndregt E, Ozaki Y, Groenenschild E, Slager CJ, Serruys PW: Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation cardiovascular angiography analysis system (CAAS II). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1993; 30: 104–114.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Doriot PA, Pochon Y, Rasoamanambelo L, Chatelain P, Welz R, Rutishauser W: Densitometry of coronary arteries — An improved physical model. In ‘Computers in Cardiology 1985’, IEEE Computer Society, 1986, pp 91–94.

  10. Wiesel J, Grunwald AM, Tobiasz C, Robin B, Bodenheimer MM: Quantitation of absolute area of a coronary arterial stenosis: experimental validation with a preparation in vivo. Circulation 1986; 74(5): 1099–1106.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Doriot PA, Suilen C, Guggenheim N, Dorsaz PA, Chappuis F, Rutishauser W: Morphometry versus densitometry-A comparison by use of casts of human coronary arteries. Int J Cardiac Imaging 1992; 8: 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simons MA, Muskett AD, Kruger RA, Klausner SC, Burton NA, Nelson JA: Quantitative digital subtraction coronary angiography using videodensitometry — An in vivo analysis. Invest Radiol 1988; 23: 98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson MR, McPherson DD, Hunt MM, Hiratzka LF, Marcus ML, Kerber RE, Collins SM, Skorton DJ: Videodensitometry is independent of angiographic projection and lumen shape. JACC 1987; 9(2): 183A.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nichols AB, Berke AD, Han J, Reison DS, Watson RM, Powers ER: Cinevideodensitometric analysis of the effect of coronary angioplasty on coronary stenotic dimensions. Am Heart J 1988; 115: 722–732.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Balkin J, Rosenmann D, Ilan M, Zion MZ: Reproducibility of measurements of coronary narrowings by videodensitometry: Unreliability of single view measurements. Int J Cardiac Imaging 1990; 5: 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Escaned J, Foley DP, Haase J, Di Mario C, Hermans WR, de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW: Quantitative angiography during coronary angioplasty with a single angiographic view: A comparison of automated edge detection and videodensitometric techniques. Am Heart J 1993; 126: 1326–1333.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wollschläger H, Zeiher AM, Lee P, Solzbach U, Bonzel T, Just H: Computed triple orthogonal projections for optimal radiological imaging with biplane isocentric multidirectional X-ray systems. In ‘Computers in Cardiology 1986’, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1986: pp 185–188.

  18. Guggenheim N, Doriot PA, Dorsaz PA, Descouts P, Rutishauser W: Spatial reconstruction of coronary arteries from angiographic images. Phys Med Biol 1991; 36/1: 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986, February 8: 307–310.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Doriot PA, Rutishauser W: Morphometric versus densitometric assessment of coronary vasomotor tone — An overview. Europ Heart J 1989; 10(Suppl. F): 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Whiting JS, Pfaff JM, Eigler NL: Advantages and limitations of videodensitometry in quantitative coronary angiography. In Reiber JHC and Serruys PW (eds): ‘Quantitative coronary arteriography’, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991, pp 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Haase J, van der Linden MMJM, Di Mario C, van der Giessen WJ, Foley DP, Serruys PW: Can the same edge-detection algorithm be applied to on-line and off-line analysis systems? Validation of a new cinefilm based geometric coronary measurement software. Am Heart J 1993; 126: 312–321.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Siebes M, Selzer RH: How accurate is the catheter as a reference for arterial dimensions in quantitative coronary angiography? In ‘Computers in Cardiology 1985’, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1985: 9–14.

  24. Fortin DF, Spero LA, Cusma JT, Santoro L, Burgess R, Bashore TM: Pitfalls in the determination of absolute dimensions using angiographic catheters as calibration devices in quantitative angiography. Am J Cardiol 1991; 68: 1176–1182.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reiber JHC, Kooijman CJ, den Boer A, Serruys PW: Assessment of dimensions and image quality of coronary contrast catheters from cineangiograms. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1985; 11: 521–531

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van den Broek JG, Slump CH, Storm CJ, van Benthem AC, Buis B: Three-dimensional densitometric reconstruction and visualization of stenosed coronary artery segments. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1995; 19(2): 207–217.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Parker DL and Wu J: 3D reconstruction of the coronary arterial tree from multiview digital angiography: a study of reconstruction accuracy. In Reiber JHC and Serruys PW (eds): ‘Quantitative coronary arteriography’, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991, pp 265–294.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hess OM, Büchi M, Kirkeeide RL, Muser M, Osenbeerg H, Niederer P, Anliker M, Gould KL, Krayenbühl HP: Quantitative coronary arteriography at rest and during exercise. In Reiber JHC and Serruys PW (eds): ‘Quantitative coronary arteriography’, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991, pp 145–153.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cardiology Center, University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 14, Switzerland

    Pierre A. Doriot PhD, Pierre A. Dorsaz, Lidia Dorsaz, Pascal Chatelain & Wilhelm Rutishauser

Authors
  1. Pierre A. Doriot PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pierre A. Dorsaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lidia Dorsaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pascal Chatelain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wilhelm Rutishauser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Doriot, P.A., Dorsaz, P.A., Dorsaz, L. et al. The impact of vessel orientation in space on densitometric measurements of cross sectional areas of coronary arteries. Int J Cardiac Imag 12, 289–297 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797742

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797742

Key words

Search

Navigation