Skip to main content
Log in

Editorial comment

  • Articles
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Nissen SN, Gurley JC, Grines C, Booth DC, McClure R, Berk M, Fischer C, DeMaria AN. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1991; 84: 1087–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nakamura S, Mahon DJ, Maheswaran B, Gutfinger DE, Colombo A, Tobis JM. An explanation for discrepancy between angiographic and intravascular ultrasound measurements after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25: 633–639.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stahr P, Rupprecht NJ, Voiglander T, Kearney P, Erbel R, Koch L, Krass S, Brennecke R, Meyer J. Importance of calibration for diameter and area determination by intravascular ultrasound. Int J Cardiac Imag 1996; 12: 221–229 (in this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson MH, Simpson IA, Katritsis D, Davies MJ, Ward DE. Intravascular ultrasound imaging of the coronary arteries: an in vitro evaluation of measurement of area of the lumen and atheroma characterization. Br Heart J 1992; 68: 276–281.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ten Hoff H, Korbijn A, Smith TH, Klinkhamer JF, Bom N. Imaging artifacts in mechanically driven ultrasound catheters. Int J Cardiac Imag 1989; 4: 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kimura BJ, Bhargava V, Palinski W, Russo RJ, DeMaria AN. Distortion of intravascular ultrasound images due to nonuniform angular velocity of mechanical-type transducer. Am Heart J 1996: 328–336.

  7. Gussenhoven EJ, Essed CE, Lancee CT, Mastik F, Frietman P, Van Egmond FC, Reiber J, Bosch H, Van Urk H, Roelandt J, Bom N. Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: an in vitro study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 947–952.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pandian NG, Kreis A, Brockway BS, Isner JM, Sacharoff A, Boleza E, Caro R, Muller D. Ultrasound angioscopy: real-time, two-dimensional, intraluminal ultrasound imaging of blood vessels. Am J Cardiol 1988; 62: 493–494.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pandian NG, Kreis A, O'Donnell T. Intravascular Ultrasound estimation of arterial stenosis. J Am Soc Echo 1989; 2: 390–397

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mallaery JA, Tobis JM, Grifith J, Gessert J, Mcrai M, Moussabeck O, Bessen M, Moriuchi M, Henry WI. Assessment of normal and atherosclerotic arterial wall thickness with an intravescular ultrasound imaging catheter. Am Heart J 1990; 119: 1392–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nishimura RA, Edwards WD, Warnes CA, Reeder GS, Holmes DR, Tajik AJ, Yock PG. Intravascular ultrasound imaging:in vitro validation and pathologic correlation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16: 145–154.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Di Mario C, Madretsma S, Linker D, The SHK, Bom N, Serruys PW, Gussenhoven EJ, Roelandt JRTC. The angle of incidence of the ultrasonic beam: A critical factor for the image quality in intravascular ultrasonography. Am Heart J 1993; 125: 442–448.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nakamura S, Colombo A, Gaglione A, Almagor Y, Goldberg SL, Maierllo L, Finci L, Tobis JM. Intracoronary ultrasound observations during stent implantation Circulation 1994; 89(5): 2026–2034.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Colombo A, Hall P, Nakamura S, Almagor Y, Maiello L, Martini G, Gaglione A, Goldberg SL, Tobis JM. Intracoronary stenting without anticoagulation accomplished with intrasvascular ultrasound guidance. Circulation 1995; (91): 1676–1688.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valmik Bhargava.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhargava, V., Penny, W.F. & Arbab-Zadeh, A. Editorial comment. Int J Cardiac Imag 12, 231–232 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797735

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797735

Keywords

Navigation