Summary
-
1.
Mutations toward streptomycin dependence occur in structural and functional heterogenous subunits of the streptomycin locus, which have been characterized as nonidentical alleles.str-d mutants of different, nonidentical alleles differ among themselves with respect to: a) the degree of depression of enzyme synthesis, the reaction toward sub-and superoptimal streptomycin concentrations, and their streptomycin and amino acid dependence, respectively, when grown in minimal medium; b) their allelespecific reaction with certain alleles of the genetic suppressorsu-str. They recombine among themselves with low frequency.
-
2.
No specific subunits for thestr-d orstr-r mutation have been found within the complexstr-locus. It has been shown that a distinctstr-d allle may revert intraallelic to thestr-r d orstr-s d condition. In addition to intraallelic reversions, suppressor mutations cause streptomycin independence.
-
3.
Thestr-d mutation is characterized by pleiotropic changes of the protein synthesis apparatus. It has been suggested that these changes affect the translation process and cause the dependence on streptomycin which acts as misreading inducing agent.
-
4.
The function of streptomycin is allelespecific and represents a case of informational suppression.
-
5.
The majority of streptomycin independent revertants is streptomycin-sensitive as the wild-type is. The major part of these revertants represent suppressor mutants genetically, and they are phenotypical either auxotrophic or noncompletely prototrophic.
-
6.
Three groups of nonidentical suppressor alleles have been identified; between two of them (su-str A and-B) recombination occur with low frequency, while mutants of groupA orB recombine with mutants of groupsu-str C with higher frequency.A, B andC are thought to be components of one complex suppressor locussu-str.
-
7.
The function of the suppressorsu-str is allelespecific, i.e. a certainsu-str allele either suppresses only distinctstr-d alleles or gives rise in combination with otherstr-d alleles to differences in the suppressor phenotype (auxotrophy or noncomplete prototrophy).
-
8.
Auxotrophic and noncompletely prototrophic suppressor mutants differ in the effectivity of enzyme synthesis. These differences are interpreted as an expression of different degrees of compensation by the function of the suppressor of thestr-d allele induced misreading. Auxotrophy as well as noncomplete prototrophy are, therefore, integrated components or results of the allelespecific suppressor function.
-
9.
The geneic suppressorsu-str has been characterized as an informational suppressor.
-
10.
The suppressorsu-str interferes with the streptomycin indifference determining allelestr-r and with the allelesstr-s andstr-s d; in the first case the effect is a change in the degree of resistance, in the latter case, a depression of growth rate.
-
11.
Suppressor mutants mutate with a generally high frequency to a limited streptomycin resistance. This change is caused by mutation of a modifier genemod str.
-
12.
Within the genome of suppressor mutants,mod str determines a limited streptomycin resistance; when being present in combination with the unsuppressedstr-d alleles,mod str acts in a similar way assu-str alleles; in the wild-type genomemod str does not function as a resistance marker. These facts show that the function ofmod str is genome specific.
-
13.
It is supposed that the function ofmod str like that ofsu-str is a result of a modification of certain ribosomal components.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Böhme, H.: Streptomycin-abhängige Mutanten vonProteus mirabilis und ihre Verwendung in Mutationsversuchen mit Manganchlorid. Biol. Zbl.80, 5–32 (1961a).
—: Über Rückmutationen und Suppressormutationen beiProteus mirabilis. Z. Vererbungsl.92, 197–204 (1961b).
—: Genetic analysis of streptomycin dependence inProteus mirabilis. Proc. XI. Intern. Congr. of Genetics, vol. 1, p. 33 (1963a).
—: Transduction of prototrophy to auxotrophic mutants ofProteus mirabilis. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun.12, 137–139 (1963b).
—: Über den Einfluß von Mutationen im Genom des Donor-Stammes auf die Transduktions-fähigkeit desProteus-Phagen π1. Abh. dtsch. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, Kl. Med., Nr.4, 107–111 (1964).
Brownstein, B. L., andL. J. Lewandowski: A mutation suppressing streptomycin dependence. I. An effect on ribosome function. J. molec. Biol.25, 99–109 (1967).
Cox, E. C., J. R. White, andJ. G. Flaks: Streptomycin action and the ribosome. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)51, 703–709 (1964).
Davies, J. E.: Studies on the ribosomes of streptomycin-sensitive and resistant strains ofE. coli. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)51, 659–664 (1964).
—,W. Gilbert, andL. Gorini: Streptomycin, suppression, and the code. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)51, 883–890 (1964).
—,L. Gorini, andB. Davis: Misreading of RNA code words induced by aminoglycoside antibiotics. J. molec. Pharmacol.1, 93–106 (1965).
Demerec, M., andP. E. Hartmann: Complex loci in microorganisms. Ann. Rev. Microbiol.13, 377–406 (1959).
Demerec, M., E. Wallace, E. M. Witkin, andG. Bertani: Genetics of streptomycin resistance inEscherichia coli. In: The gene. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yr. Bk.48, 154–166 (1949).
Demerec, M., E. Witkin, B. Catlin, J. Flint, W. Belser, C. Dissoway, F. Kennedy, N. Meyer, andA. Schwartz: In: The gene. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yr. Bk.48, 144–157 (1950).
Desai, I. D., andW. J. Polglase: Threonine dehydratase of streptomycin-dependentEscherichia coli K-12. Biochim. biophys. Acta (Amst.)114, 642–644 (1966).
Erdös, T., andA. Ullmann: Effect of streptomycin on the incorporation of amino acids labelled with C14 into RNA and protein in cell-free systems of aMycobacterium. Nature (Lond.)183, 618–619 (1959).
Flaks, J. G., E. C. Cox, M. L. Witting, andJ. R. White: Polypeptide synthesis with ribosomes from streptomycin-resistant and dependentE. coli. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun.7, 390–393 (1962).
Fraser, S. J., andW. C. McDonald: Analysis of mutations from streptomycin dependence to nondependence inBacillus sublilis by transformation. J. Bact.92, 1582–1583 (1966).
Gabor, M.: Transformation of streptomycin markers in rough strains ofRhizobium lupinii. II. The relation between the determinant of stroptomycin dependence and those for streptomycin resistance and sensitiveness. Genetics52, 905–913 (1965).
Gartner, T. K., andE. Orias: Effect of mutation to streptomycin resistance on the rate of translation of mutant genetic information. J. Bact.91, 1021–1028 (1966).
Goldschmidt, E. P., T. S. Matney, andH. T. Bausum: Genetic analysis of mutations from dependence to independence inSalmonella typhimurium. Genetics47, 1475–1487 (1962).
Gorini, L., andJ. R. Beckwith: Suppression. Ann. Rev. Microbiol.20, 401–422 (1966).
—: Ribosomal ambiguity. Cold Spr. Harb. Symp. quant. Biol.31, 637–664 (1966).
—: Phenotypic repair by streptomycin of defective genotyps inE. coli. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)51, 487–493 (1964).
Hashimoto, K.: Streptomycin resistance inEscherichia coli analysed by transduction. Genetics45, 49–62 (1960)
Landman, O. E., andW. Buchard: The mechanism of action of streptomycin as revealed by normal and abnormal division in streptomycin-dependentSalmonella. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)48, 219–228 (1962).
Leboy, P. S., E. C. Cox andG. Flaks: The chromosomal site specifying a ribosomal protein inEscherichia coli. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)52, 1367–1374 (1964).
Lederberg, E. M., L. Cavalli-Sforza, andJ. Lederberg: Interaction of streptomycin and a suppressor for galactose fermentation inE. coli K-12. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)51, 678–682 (1964).
Lewandowski, L. J., andB. L. Brownstein: An altered pattern of ribosome synthesis in a mutant ofE. coli. Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun.25, 554–561 (1966).
Medill, M. A., andD. J. O'Kane: A synthetic medium for the L type colonies ofProteus. J. Bact.68, 530–533 (1954).
Newcombe, H. B., andM. H. Nyholm: The inheritance of streptomycin resistance and dependence in crosses ofEscherichia coli. Genetics35, 603–611 (1950).
Pestka, S., R. Marshall andM. Nirenberg: RNA-codewords and protein synthesis. V. Effect of streptomycin on the formation of ribosome-sRNA-complexes. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)53, 639–646 (1965).
Polglase, W. J., S. Peretz, andS. Roote: Adaptive enzyme formation by dihydrostreptomycin-dependentEscherichia coli. Canad. J. Biochem.34, 558–562 (1957).
—: Regulation of acetohydroxy acid synthetase in streptomycin-dependentEscherichia coli. Canad. J. Biochem.44, 599–606 (1966).
Rausa, L., andY. C. Strasters: Protein synthesis in a streptomycin-dependent strain ofStaphylococcus aureus. G. Microbiol.11, 175–182 (1962).
Speyer, J. E., P. Lengyel, andC. Basilio: Ribosomal localization of streptomycin sensitivity. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.)48, 684–686 (1962).
Spotts, C. R.: Physiological and biochemical studies on streptomycin dependence inEscherichia coli. J. gen. Microbiol.28, 347–365 (1962).
Staehelin, T., andM. Meselson: Determination of streptomycin sensitivity by a structural component of the 30S ribosome ofEscherichia coli. J. molec. Biol.19, 207–210 (1966).
Swanstrom, M., andM. H. Adams: Agar layer method for production of high titer phage stocks. Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. (N.Y.)78, 372–375 (1951).
Szybalski, W., andJ. Cocito-Vandermeulen: Neamine and streptomycin dependence inE. coli. Bact. Proc.1958, 37–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hofemeister, J., Böhme, H. Streptomycin-abhängige Mutanten vonProteus mirabilis: Ihre Genetik, Suppression und Modifikation. Molec. Gen. Genet. 99, 219–247 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797728
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797728