Summary
Left ventricular (LV) wall thickness was determined by magnetic resonance (MR) in 15 patients (7 controls and 8 patients with coronary artery disease). End-diastolic (ed) and end-systolic (es) wall thickness were measured in a short axis view perpendicular to the LV long axis. Wall thickness measurements were compared to data obtained by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and M-mode echocardiography (Echo).
End-diastolic and end-systolic wall thickness were significantly overestimated by MR (34% and 37%, respectively) when compared to DSA. In contrast, LV end-diastolic and end-systolic chamber diameter were significantly underestimated by MR (25% and 30%, respectively) when compared to DSA. However, fractioned shortening was similar (all NS) for MR (48±22%), DSA (54±15%) and Echo (44±10%), respectively.
The mean difference (= accuracy) and the standard deviation of difference (= precision) for LV wall thickness was 0.4±0.2 cm between MR and DSA, 0.4±0.3 cm between MR and ECHO and 0.03±0.1 cm between DSA and ECHO. The correlation of wall thickness between MR and DSA (correlation coefficient r=0.74, p<0.001) and between MR and Echo (r=0.70, p<0.001) was good although the standard error of estimate (SEE) was 17% for MR vs. DSA and 21% for MR vs. Echo. The corresponding SEE for chamber diameter was 16% between MR and DSA and 19% between MR and Echo, respectively. Intraobserver variability for wall thickness determination by MR was excellent (correlation coefficient r=0.99, p<0.001) SEE of 4%. Interobserver variability was also good (correlation coefficient r=0.90, p<0.001) with a SEE of 12%.
It is concluded that LV wall thickness and chamber diameter (short axis plane) can be determined by MR with good precision but only satisfactory accuracy. LV wall thickness is significantly overestimated probably due to signals from static blood which might be indistinguishable from the subendocardium.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Troy BL, Pombo J, Rackley CE. Measurement of left ventricular wall thickness and mass by echocardiography. Circulation 1972; 45: 602–11.
Miller SW, Dinsmore RE, Wittenberg J, Maturi FA, Powell WJ Jr. Right and left ventricular volumes and wall measurements: determination by computed tomography in arrested canine hearts. Am J Roentgenol 1977; 129: 257–61.
Florentine MS, Grosskreutz CL, Chang W, Hartnett JA, Dunn VD, Ehrhardt JC, Fleagle SR, Collins SM, Marcus ML, Skorton DJ. Measurements of left ventricular massin vivo using gated nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986; 8: 107–12.
Radtke W, Buersch JH, Brennecke R, Hahne HJ, Heintzen PH. Assessment of left ventricular muscle volume by digital angiocardiography. Invest Radiol 1983; 18: 149–54.
Grob D, Hess OM, Monrad E, Birchler B, Grimm J, Krayenbuehl HP. Determination of left ventricular wall thickness and muscle mass by intravenous digital subtraction angiocardiography: validation of the method. Eur Heart J 1988; 9: 73–86.
Rackley CE, Dodge HT, Coble YD, Hay RE. A method for determining left ventricular mass in man. Circulation 1964; 29: 666–71.
Sechtem U, Sommerhoff BA, Markiewicz W, White RD, Cheitlin MD, Higgins CB. Regional left ventricular wall thickening by magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation in normal persons and patients with global and regional dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 1987; 59: 145–51.
Fischer MR, von Schulthess GK, Higgins CB. Multiphasic cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: normal regional left ventricular wall thickening. Am J Roentgenol 1985; 145: 27–30.
Byrd BF, Schiller NB, Botvinick EH, Higgins CB. Normal cardiac dimensions by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 1440–42.
Birchler B, Hess OM, Murakami T, Niederer P, Anliker M, Krayenbuehl HP. Comparison of intravenous digital subtraction cineangiocardiography with conventional contrast ventriculography for the determination of the left ventricular volume at rest and during exercise. Eur Heart J 1985; 6: 497–509.
Jakob M, Hess OM, Jenni R, Haag U, Grimm J, Krayenbuehl HP. Can left ventricular systolic wall thickness and muscle mass be determined by digital subtraction angiography? Eur Heart J 1989; 10 (suppl.): 336 (abstr.).
Hess OM, Carroll JD, Brayshaw C, Krayenbuehl HP. Beurteilung regionaler Kontraktionsstörungen des linken Ventrikels mittles 2-dimensionaler Echokardiographie. Schweiz Med Wschr 1983; 113: 826–32.
Senn M, Hess OM, Krayenbuehl HP. Nifedipin in der Behandlung der hypertrophen nicht-obstruktiven Kardiomyopathie. Schweiz Med Wschr 1982; 112: 1312–17.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307–10.
Germain P, Baruthio J, Wecker D, Favier JP, Wahl P, Chambron J, Sacrez A. Intérêt de l'IRM dans les myocardiopathies dilatées. Approche de l'hémodynamique intraventriculaire. Arch Mal Coeur 1987; 12: 1753–62.
Friedman JB, Waters JF, Kwan LO, DeMaria AN. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography in determination of cardiac dimensions in normal subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 1369–76.
Higgins CB, Byrd BD, Stark D, McNamara M, Lanzer P, Lipton MJ, Schiller NB, Botvinick E, Chatterjee K. Magnetic resonance imaging in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 11821–6.
Byrd BF, Schiller NB, Botvinick EH, Higgins CB. Normal cardiac dimensions by magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol 1985; 55: 1440–2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haag, U.J., Hess, O.M., Maier, S.E. et al. Left ventricular wall thickness measurements by magnetic resonance: a validation study. Int J Cardiac Imag 7, 31–41 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797678
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797678