Advertisement

Archive for Mathematical Logic

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Groupwise density and related cardinals

  • Andreas Blass
Article

Abstract

We prove several theorems about the cardinal\(\mathfrak{g}\) associated with groupwise density. With respect to a natural ordering of families of nond-ecreasing maps fromω toω, all families of size\(< \mathfrak{g}\) are below all unbounded families. With respect to a natural ordering of filters onω, all filters generated by\(< \mathfrak{g}\) sets are below all non-feeble filters. If\(\mathfrak{u}< \mathfrak{g}\) then\(\mathfrak{b}< \mathfrak{u}\) and\(\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{d} = \mathfrak{c}\). (The definitions of these cardinals are recalled in the introduction.) Finally, some consequences deduced from\(\mathfrak{u}< \mathfrak{g}\) by Laflamme are shown to be equivalent to\(\mathfrak{u}< \mathfrak{g}\).

Keywords

Mathematical Logic Related Cardinal Unbounded Family 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blass, A.: Near coherence of filters. I. Cofinal equivalence of models of arithmetic. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic27, 579–591 (1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blass, A.: Near coherence of filters. II. Applications to operator ideals, the Stone-Čech remainder of a half-line, order ideals of sequences, and slenderness of groups. Trans. Am. Math. Soc.300, 557–581 (1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blass, A., Shelah, S.: There may be simple Pκ and\(P_{\kappa _2 } \) points and the Rudin-Keisler order may be downward directed. Ann. Pure Appl. Logic83, 213–243 (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blass, A., Shelah, S.: Near coherence of filters. III. A simplified consistency proof. Notre Dame J. Formal Logic30, 530–538 (1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blass, A., Laflamme, C.: Consistency results about filters and the number of inequivalent growth types. J. Symb. Logic54, 50–56 (1989)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blass, A.: Applications of superperfect forcing and its relatives. In: Steprano, J., Watson, S. (eds.) Set theory and its applications. (Lect. Notes Math. vol. 1401, pp. 18–40) Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 1989Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Douwen, E.: The integers and topology. In: Kunen, K., Vaughan, J. (eds.) Handbook of set-theoretic topology. Amsterdam: North-Holland 1984, pp. 111–167Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Göbel, R., Wald, B.: Wachstumstypen und schlanke Gruppen. Symp. Math.23, 201–239 (1979)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Göbel, R., Wald, B.: Martin's axiom implies the existence of certain slender groups. Math. Z.172, 107–121 (1980)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jech, T.: Set theory. New York: Academic Press 1978Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Just, W., Laflamme, C.: Classification of measure zero sets with respect to their open covers. (To appear in Trans. Am. Math. Soc.)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laflamme, C.: Equivalence of families of functions on the natural numbers. (To appear)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Plewik, S.: Intersections and unions of ultrafilters without the Baire property. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Math.35, 805–808 (1987)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Puritz, C.: Ultrafilters and standard functions in non-standard arithmetic. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. III. Ser.22, 705–733 (1971)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simon, P.: Private communication. August 1987Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Solomon, R.: Families of sets and functions. Czech. Math. J.27, 556–559 (1977)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Talagrand, M.: Filtres non mesurables et compacts de fonctions mesurables. Stud. Math.67, 13–43 (1980)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Blass
    • 1
  1. 1.Mathematics DepartmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations