Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro stepwise selection of resistance to quinolones, β-lactams and amikacin in nosocomial gram-negative bacilli

Schrittweise Selektion der Resistenz gegenüber Chinolonen, β-Laktam-Antibiotika und Amikacin bei gramnegativen Erregern nosokomialer Infektionen

  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The ability of six antibiotics to produce resistance by stepwise selection on agar medium was assessed in 24 gram-negative rods.Escherichia coli was the strain least prone to selection of resistance, whereasPseudomonas aeruginosa frequently developed resistance to all antibiotics. When used alone, ciprofloxacin, pefloxacin, amikacin, ceftazidime and cefpirome were associated with a comparable risk of acquired resistance (in 14 to 17 out of 24 strains); imipenem selected resistant strains in 10/24 isolates (5/18 in non-pseudomonas strains). The number of strains exhibiting cross resistance with structurally unrelated antibiotics was 11 after pefloxacin treatment, eight after exposure to ciprofloxacin, six after ceftazidime, and one after imipenem or cefpirome. The combination of ciprofloxacin with amikacin was less efficient in reducing acquisition of resistance than the combination of ciprofloxacin with a beta-lactam: ciprofloxacin plus cefpirome was especially potent in this respect.

Zusammenfassung

Durch die schrittweise Selektion auf Agarmedium wurde die Fähigkeit von sechs Antibiotika zur Induktion von Resistenz bei 24 gramnegativen Stäbchen geprüft. BeiEscherichia coli war die Resistenzentwicklung durch Selektion weniger ausgeprägt,Pseudomonas aeruginosa hatte hingegen eine ausgeprägte Neigung zur Resistenzentwicklung gegen alle getesteten Antibiotika. Bei Einsatz als Einzelsubstanzen waren Ciprofloxacin, Pefloxacin, Amikacin, Ceftazidim und Cefpirom mit einem vergleichbaren Risiko erworbener Resistenz (bei 14 bis 17 von 24 der getesteten Stämme) assoziiert. Imipenem selektierte resistente Stämme von 10 der 24 Isolate (5/18 der Nicht-Pseudomonas-Stämme). Nach Behandlung mit Pefloxacin entwickelten 11 Stämme eine Kreuzresistenz mit strukturell unverwandten Antibiotika; nach Exposition gegenüber Ciprofloxacin waren es acht, nach Ceftazidim sechs und nach Imipenem oder Cefpirom einer. Die Kombination von Ciprofloxacin mit Amikacin hatte weniger Potential, die Resistenzentwicklung zu verhindern als die Kombination von Ciprofloxacin mit einem β-Laktam-Antibiotikum. Ciproflox-acin plus Cefpirom war in dieser Hinsicht besonders wirksam.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gibbons, A. Exploring new strategies to fight drug-resistant microbes. Science 257 (1992) 1036–1038.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Michéa-Hamzehpour, M., Auckenthaler, R., Regamey, P., Pechère, J. C. Resistance occurring after fluoroquinolone therapy of experimentalPseudomonas aeruginosa peritonitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31 (1987) 1803–1808.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chin, N. X., Clynes, N., Neu, H. C. Resistance to ciprofloxacin appearing during therapy. Am. J. Med. 87 (Suppl. 5A) (1989) 28S-31S.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gutmann, L., Williamson, R., Moreau, N., Kitzis, M. D., Collatz, E., Acar, J. F., Goldstein, F. W. Cross resistance to nalidixic acid, trimethoprim, and chloramphenicol associated with alterations in outer membrane proteins ofKlebsiella, Enterobacter andSerratia. J. Infect. Dis. 151 (1985) 501–507.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bryson, L., Szybalski, W. Microbial selection. Science 116 (1952) 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Michéa-Hamzehpour, M., Pechère, J. C., Marchou, B., Auckenthaler, R. Combination therapy: a way to limit emergence of resistance? Am. J. Med. 80 (Suppl. 6B) (1986) 138–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thornsberry, C., Anhalt, J., Barry, A. L., Gerlach, E. H., Hossom, J., Jones, R. N., Matsen, J. M., Moellering, R. C., Norton, R. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Villanova, PA, vol. 3 1983, pp. 48–56.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Milatovic, D., Braveny, I. Development of resistance during antibiotic therapy. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 6 (1987) 234–244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Michéa-Hamzehpour, M., Auckenthaler, R., Kunz, J., Pechère, J. C. Effect of a single dose of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone on human faecal flora. A double-blind study. Drugs 35 (Suppl. 2) (1988) 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sanders, C. C., Sanders, Jr. W. E., Goering, R. V., Werner, V. Selection of multiple antibiotic resistance by quinolones, β-lactams, and aminoglycosides with special reference to cross-resistance between unrelated drug classes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 26 (1984) 797–801.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ubukata, K., Nonoguchi, R., Matsuhashi, M., Song, M. D., Konno, M. Restriction maps of the regions coding for methicillin and tobramycin resistances on chromosomal DNA in methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33 (1989) 1624–1626.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shalit, I., Berger, S. A., Gorea, A., Frimerman, H. Widespread quinolone resistance among methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus isolated in a general hospital. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33 (1989) 593–594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Blumberg, H. M., Rimland, D., Carroll, D. J., Terry, P., Wachsmuth, I. K. Rapid development of ciprofloxacin resistance in methicillin-susceptible and -resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 163 (1991) 1279–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hori, S., Ohshita, Y., Utsui, Y., Hiramatsu, K. Sequential acquisition of norfloxacin and ofloxacin resistance by methicillin-resistant and -susceptibleStaphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37 (1993) 2278–2284.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen, S. P., McMurry, L. M., Hooper, D. C., Wolfson, J. S., Levy, S. B. Cross-resistance to fluoroquinolones in multiple-antibiotic-resistant (Mar)Escherichia coli selected by tetracycline or chloramphenicol: decreased drug accumulation associated with membrane changes in addition to OmpF reduction. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33 (1989) 1318–1325.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Michéa-Hamzehpour, M., Lucain, C., Pechère, J. C. Resistance to pefloxacin inPseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35 (1991) 512–518.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Trias, J., Nikaido, H. Outer membrane protein D2 catalyzes facilitated diffusion of carbapenems and penems through the outer membrane ofPseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34 (1990) 52–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jacobson, K. L., Cohen, S. H., King, J. H., Lippert, W. E., Inciardi, J. F., Iglesias, T.: The relationship between resistance to extended spectrum cephalosporins and antecedent antibiotic use in type 1 β-lactamase producing organisms. 33rd ICAAC, USA 1993, Abstract 625.

  19. Wallrauch-Schwarz, C., Voss, A., Milatovic, D., Braveny, I.: Development of resistance to new β-lactams and ciprofloxacin during therapy study. A prospective study. 33rd ICAAC, USA 1993, Abstract 627.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michéa-Hamzehpour, M., Kahr, A. & Pechère, J.C. In vitro stepwise selection of resistance to quinolones, β-lactams and amikacin in nosocomial gram-negative bacilli. Infection 22 (Suppl 2), S105–S110 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01793574

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01793574

Keywords

Navigation