Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Der Ursprung der Angiospermen

  • Published:
Österreichische botanische Zeitschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Allen G. The Colours of Flowers. Nature, London 1882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. Discussion on the Vascular Structure of Seedlings. New Phytologist, Vol. V, 1906, p. 182.

  • Benson M. The Origin of Flowering Plants. New Phytologist, Vol. III, 1904, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, Sanday E. and Berridge E. Contributions to the Embryology of theAmentiferae. Part. II.Carpinus Betulus. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, 2. Ser., Bot., Vol. VII, pt. 3, 1906, p. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessey C. E. Phylogeny and Taxonomy of the Angiosperms. Bot. Gaz., Vol. XXIV, 1897, p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell D. H. (1891). Contributions to the Life-History ofIsoetes. Ann. of Bot., Vol. V, 1891, p. 231.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1905). Studies on theAraceae. III. Ann. of Bot., Vol. XIX, 1905, p. 329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capellini G. und Solms-Laubach, Graf zu. I Tronchi di Bennettitee dei musei italiani. Mem. R. Accad. Sci. Ist. Bologna, Ser. 5, Vol. II, 1891, p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers W. On Fossil Cycadean Stems from the Secondary Rocks of Britain. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Vol. XXVI, 1870, p. 675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Čelakovský L. J. Über den phylogenetischen Entwicklungsgang der Blüte und über den Ursprung der Blumenkrone. I. Teil. Sitzungsberichte d. k. Böhm. Gesell. d. Wiss. (M.-N. Kl.), 1896–1897; II. Teil. ibid., 1900–1901.

  • Chamberlain C. J. Contributions to the Life-History ofSalix. Bot. Gaz., Vol. XXIII, 1897, p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrysler M. A. The Nodes of Grasses. Bot. Gaz., Vol. XLI, 1906, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter J. M. and Chamberlain C. J. Morphology of Angiosperms. London and New York, 1904.

  • Engler A. in Engler und Prantl: Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Nachtrag: Teil II–IV. Leipzig, 1897.

  • Frye T. C. The Embryo-Sac ofCasuarina stricta. Bot. Gaz., Vol. XXXVI, 1903, p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner W. On the Physiological Significance of Water-Glands and Nectaries. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., Vol. V, part 1, 1883, p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel K. Organography of Plants. Part II. Special Organography (English Edition), Oxford, 1905.

  • Haines H. H. On two new Species ofPopulus from Darjeeling. Journ. Linn. Soc. London, Bot., Vol. XXXVII, 1906, p. 407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallier H. (19011). Beiträge zur Morphogenie der Sporophylle und des Trophophylls in Beziehung zur Phylogenie der Kormophyten. Jahrb. Hamburg. Wissen. Anstalt., Beih. 3, Vol. XIX, 1901, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (19012). Über die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der Tubifloren und Ebenalen, den polyphyletischen Ursprung der Sympetalen und Apetalen und die Anordnung der Angiospermen überhaupt. Abhandl. d. Naturw. Ver. Hamburg, Vol. XVI, 1901, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1903). Über den Umfang, die Gliederung und die Verwandtschaft der Familie der Hamamelidaceen. Beihefte z. Bot. Centralbl., Vol. XIV, 1903, p. 247.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1905). Provisional Scheme of the Natural (Phylogenetic) System of Flowering Plants. New Phytologist, Vol. IV, p. 151, 1905. S. auch Ber. d. Deutsch. bot. Gesellsch., Vol. XXIII, 1905, p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms H. Über die Stellung der GattungTetracentron Oliv. und die Familie der Trochodendraceen. Ber. d. Deutsch. bot. Gesellsch., Vol. XV, 1897, p. 350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henslow G. (18931). A Theoretical Origin of Endogens from Exogens trough Self-Adaption to an Aquatic Habit. Journ. Linn. Soc. London, Bot. Vol. XXIX, 1893, p. 485.

    Google Scholar 

  • - - (18932). The Origin of Floral Structures through Insect and other Agencies. 2. Edit. Intern. Scient. Ser. Vol. LXIV. London, 1893.

  • Hill A. W. The Morphology and Seedling-Structure of the Geophilous Species ofPeperomia, together with some Views on the Origin of Monocotyledons. Ann. of Bot., Vol. XX, 1906, p. 395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill T. G. On the Seedling-Structure of certainPiperales. Ann. of Bot., Vol. XX, 1906, p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— and De Fraine E. On the Seedling-Structure of Gymnosperms. Ann. of Bot., Vol. XX, 1906, p. 471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D. S. Seed Development in thePiperales and its bearing on the Relationship of the Order. John Hopkins Univ. Circ., Nr. 178 (N. S., Nr. 5), 1905, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis C. E. Studies on some anomalous Dicotyledonous plants. Bot. Gaz., Vol. XXXVII, 1904, p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lignier O. (1894). Végétaux fossiles de Normandie. Structure et Affinités duBennettites Morierei Sap. et Mar. (sp.). Mém. Soc. Linn. Normandie, Vol. XVIII, 1894, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1901). Végétaux fossiles de Normandie. IIIe Étude anatomique duCycadeoidea micromyela, Mor. Mém. Soc. Linn. Normandie, Vol. XX, 1901, p. 331.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (19031). Le Fruit duWilliamsonia gigas Carr. et lesBennettitales Mém. Soc. Linn. Normandie, Vol. XXI, 1903, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (19032). La Fleur des Gnetacées est-elle intermédiaire entre celle des Gymnospermes et celle des Angiospermes? Bull. Soc. Linn. Normandie, Sér. 5, Vol. VII, 1903, p. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lignier O. (1904). Notes complémentaires sur la structure duBennettites Morierei Sap. et Mar. Bull. Soc. Linn. Normandie, Sér. 5, Vol. VIII, 1904, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotsy J. Contributions to the Life-History of the genusGnetum. Ann. Jard. Bot., Buitenzorg, Vol. XVI (Ser.2, Vol. I), 1899, p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon H. L. (1901). Observations on the Embryogeny ofNelumbo. Minnesota Botanica Studies, Vol. 2, Nr. XXXVIII, 1901, p. 643.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1905). The Embryo of the Angiosperms. Americ. Nat., Vol. XXXIX, 1905, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris D. On the Phenomena concerned in the Production of Forked and Branched Palms. Journ. Linn. Soc. London, Bot. Vol. XXIX, 1893, p. 281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mottier D. M. The Embryology of some Anomalous Dicotyledons. Ann. of Bot., Vol. XIX, 1905, p. 447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathorst A. G. (1880). Några anmärkningar omWilliamsonia Carruthers. Öfvers. k. Vetenskaps-Akad. Förhandl., Vol. XXXVII, Nr. 9, 1880, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • - - (1902). Beiträge zur Kenntnis einiger mesozoischen Cycadophyten. K. Svensk. Vetensk.-Akad. Handl., Vol. XXXVI, Nr. 4, 1902.

  • Oliver F. W. Pteridosperms and Angiosperms. New Phytologist, Vol. V, Nr. 10, 1906, p. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plowman A. B. The Comparative Anatomy and Phylogeny of theCyperaceae. Ann. of Bot., Vol. XX, 1906, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prantl K. Beiträge zur Morphologie und Systematik der Ranunculaceen. Englers Bot. Jahrb., Vol. IX, 1888, p. 225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson C. The Structure of the Flowers and the Mode of Pollination of the Primitive Angiosperms. Bot. Gaz., Vol. XXXVII, 1904, p. 294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saporta Gaston de (1875). Paléontologie française. 2e Séries - Végétaux. Plantes Jurassiques. Vol. II. Cycadées. Paris, 1875.

  • - - (1891). Paléontologie française. 2e Séries-Végétaux. Plantes Jurassiques. Vol. IV. Types Proangiospermiques etc. Paris, 1891.

  • —— et Marion A. F. (1881). Sur les genresWilliamsonia Carruth. etGoniolina d'Orb. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Vol. XCIV, 1881, p. 1185 und 1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • - - (1885). L'Évolution du Règne végétal. Les Phanerogames. Vol. I. Paris, 1885.

  • Sargant E. (1903). A Theory of the Origin of Monocotyledons founded on the Structure of their Seedlings. Ann. of Bot., Vol. XVII, 1903, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1904). The Evolution of Monocotyledons. Bot. Gaz., Vol. XXXVII, 1904, p. 325.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1905). The Early History of Angiosperms. Bot. Gaz., Vol. XXXIX, 1905, p. 420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner J. H. The Development of the Stamens and Carpels ofTypha latifolia. Bot. Gaz., Vol XXIV, 1897, p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott D. H. (1900). Studies in Fossil Botany. London 1900.

  • —— (1901). On the Structure and Affinities of Fossil Plants from the Palaeozoic Rocks. IV. The Seed-like Fructification ofLepidocarpon, a genus of Lycopodiaceous cones from the Carboniferous Formation. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Ser. B., Vol. 194, 1901, p. 291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seward A. C. The Wealden Flora. Part. II.Gymnospermae. Catalogue of the Mesozoic Plants in the British Museum (Nat. Hist.), London, 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker D. N. On the Development ofHamamelis virginiana. Bot. Gaz., Vol. XXXIX, 1905, p. 248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solms-Laubach H., Graf zu (1890). Über die Fruktifikation vonBennettites Gibsonianus Carr. Bot. Zeit., 1890, p. 789, 805, 821, 843. Übersetzung in Ann. of Bot., Vol. V, 1891, p. 419.

  • - - (1891). Fossil Botany (Engl. Trans.), Oxford, 1891.

  • Strasburger E. Die Samenanlage vonDrimys Winteri und die Endosperm-bildung bei Angiospermen. Flora, XCV, 1905, p. 215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treub M. Sur les Casuarinées et leur place dans le système naturel. Ann. Jard. Bot., Buitenzorg, Vol. X, 1891, p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace A. R. Darwinism. London, 1889.

  • Wieland G. R. (1899). A Study of some American Fossil Cycads. Parts I–III, Amer. Journ. of Sci., Ser.4, Vol. VII, 1899, p. 219, 305, 383.

    Google Scholar 

  • —— (1901). A Study of some American Fossil Cycads. Part IV. On the Microsporangiate Fructification ofCycadeoidea. Amer. Journ. of Sci., Ser. 4, Vol. XI, 1901, p. 423.

    Google Scholar 

  • - - (1906). American Fossil Cycads. Washington, 1906.

  • Williamson W. C. Contributions towards the History ofZamia gigas Lindl. and Hutt. Trans. Linn. Soc. London, Vol. XXVI, 1870, p. 663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis J. C. A Manual and Dictionary of the Flowering Plants and Ferns. 2. Edit. Cambridge, 1904.

  • Vries H. de (1901). Die Mutationstheorie. Vols. I–II. Leipzig. 1901–1903.

  • - - (1905). Species and Varieties. Their Origin by Mutation. London 1905.

  • Yates J. Notice ofZamia gigas, a fossil plant occurring on the N. E. coast of Yorkshire. Proc. Yorkshire Phil. Soc. (read 1847), 1855, p. 37.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Trinity College, Cambridge

    E. A. N. Arber & J. Parkin

  2. Autorisierte Übersetzung aus dem Englishen, Wien

    Otto Porsch

Authors
  1. E. A. N. Arber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Parkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Otto Porsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arber, E.A.N., Parkin, J. & Porsch, O. Der Ursprung der Angiospermen. Osterr. botan. Zeitschrift 58, 184–204 (1908). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01791772

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01791772

Search

Navigation