Summary
Four hundred and seventy-seven professionals attended thirteen group relations conferences. Conferences varied across three dimensions:context, including sponsorship and history;design, involving duration, intensity (residential setting) and complexity; andlinkages, the social and authority ties between members and staff. Three month follow-up questionnaires were collected from sixty percent of participants. Significantly more self-assessed learning was reported by those who attended the residential than the non-residential conferences. The results, from a large diversified sample, suggest that acombination of training in a residential setting, strong institutional sponsorship and pre-existing authority and social linkages between members and staff resulted in the most reported learning. Group relations conferences provide unique learning opportunities for mental health professionals, (Correa et al. 1981) and have been increasingly used in the United States and Europe during the last twenty years. Despite this, there is little research evaluating the outcomes of such training in terms of member learning or the differential effectiveness of the alternative forms of conferences currently available. Conferences vary along three major dimensions: a)context, including the institutional sponsorship as well as the history of previous conferences held at the same site, b)design, including the duration, intensity and number of events which make up the conference, and c)linkages, the social and authority relations among members and staff. A review of the first decade of group relations work in the United States concluded that the characteristics of a conference, including the setting have an important impact on member learning, (Klein 1978). Since this review, there have been few studies that address the relationship between conference characteristics and outcomes. Using a large sample of conferences which were held in six different geographic regions of the United States, the present study investigates the relationship between outcomes in terms of self-reported member learning and the context, design and linkage dimensions of the conferences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alderfer CP, Smith K (1982) Studying intergroup relations embedded in organizations. Administr Sci Q 27: 35–65
Bion W (1959) Experiences in groups. Basic Books, New York
Bunker DR, Knowles ES (1967) Comparison of behavioral changes resulting from human relations training laboratories of different lengths. J Appl Behav Sci 3: 505–523
Correa ME, Klein EB, Howe SR, Stone WN (1981) A bridge between training and practice: mental health professionals' learning in group relations conferences. Soc Psychiatry 16: 137–142
Correa ME, Klein EB, Stone WN, Astrachan JH, Kossek EE, Komarraju M (1988) Reactions to women in authority: the impact of gender on learning in group relations conferences J Appl Behav Sci 24: 219–233
Freud S (1921) Group psychology and the analysis of the ego, vol 18, Standard edn Vienna International Psycho-Analytical Press
Joseph DI, Klein EB, Astrachan BM (1975) Responses of mental health trainees to a group relations conference: understanding from a systems perspective. Soc Psychiatry 10: 79–85
Klein M (1959) Our adult world and its roots in infancy. Hum Relat 12: 291–303
Klein EB (1977) Transference in groups. J Pers Soc Syst 7: 53–63
Klein EB (1978) An overview of recent Tavistock work in the United States. In: Cooper CL, Alderfer CP (eds) Advances in experiential social processes. Wiley, New York, pp 182–202
Klein EB, Correa ME, Howe SR, Stone WN (1983) The effect of social systems on group relations training. Soc Psychiatry 18: 7–12
Lieberman MA, Yalom ID, Miles MB (1973) Encounter groups: first facts. Basic Books, New York
Malan DH, Balfour FHG, Hood VG, Shooter A (1976) Group psychotherapy: a long-term follow-up study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 33: 1303–1315
Menninger R (1985) A retrospective view of a hospital-wide group relations training programm: costs, consequences and conclusions. In: Colman AD, Geller M (eds) The group relations reader, 2. AK Rice Institute, Washington, DC
Menzies IEP (1960) A case study in the functioning of social systems as a defense against anxiety. Hum Relat 13: 95–121
Miller EJ, Rice AK (1969) Systems of organization. Tavistock, London
Rice AK (1965) Learning for leadership. Tavistock, London
Rioch MJ (1977) The A.K. Rice group relations conference as a reflection of society. J Pers Soc Syst 1: 1–16
Singer DL, Astrachan BM, Gould LJ, Klein EB (1975) Boundary management in psychological work with groups. J Appl Behav Sci 11: 137–176
Trist EL, Bamforth KW (1951) Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal getting. Hum Relat 4: 3–38
Tukey JW (1953) The problem of multiple comparisons. (Unpublished manuscript) Princeton University, NJ
Wedel TO (1962) Interpersonal groups and the church. In: Casteel JT (ed) The creative role of interpersonal groups in the church today. Association Press, New York
Wells L (1985) The group-as-a-whole perspective and its theoretical roots. In: Colman AD, Geller MH (eds) Group relations reader, 2. A.K. Rice Institute, Washington, DC
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was supported by a grant from the University of Cincinnati Research Council
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Klein, E.B., Stone, W.N., Correa, M.E. et al. Dimensions of experiential learning at group relations conferences. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 24, 241–248 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01788965
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01788965