Skip to main content
Log in

Physicians and death: Comments and behaviour of 605 doctors in the north-east of Italy

  • Special Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of socio-demographic and professional factors on physicians' attitudes to the terminally ill. Between May 1992 and May 1993, a survey was conducted in the province of Pordenone (north-east, Italy) in order to analyse a number of specific issues, such as emotional involvement, the need for aggressive treatments and the communication of diagnosis and prognosis. After obtaining a list of board-certified physicians from the Medical Association office in Pordenone, a modification of the cancer questionnaire of Haley and Blanchard (QSPT) was mailed to 916 doctors. Of these, 605 (60%; 487 male, 118 female; mean age 41 ± 11 SD) returned the completed questionnaire. Within the group of responders, we identified three main subgroups, according to their type of activity: general practitioners (175, 29%), hospital doctors (235, 39%) and other doctors (195, 32%). In age, sex and activity, the only significant difference between responders and non-responders was age (mean age 41 and 43 years respeetively). Most of the responders (77%) stated that they were able to deal with the terminally ill patient and his/her needs; 44%, however, admitted that patients' anxiety is sometimes unbearable. For the vast majority of the doctors polled (91%), providing a comfortable environment for an incurable patient was more important than pursuing aggressive treatment, but only 44% were convinced of the uselessness of aggressive care. To the question on whether to disclose information about imminent death to allow patients to prepare spiritually, 37% answered “No”, 38% “Yes”, and 25% were uncertain. Almost all responders (95%), however, believed in the beneficial effect of hope on the terminally ill. Ourresults suggest that doctors' professional and, most of all, sociodemographic and cultural factors determine the relationship with the patient on both the emotional and the clinical decision-making levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amir M (1987) Considerations guiding physicians when informing cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 9:741–748

    Google Scholar 

  2. Annunziata MA (1993) Dalla comunicazione diagnostica alla conversazione. In: Grassi L (ed) Il disagio psichico in oncologia. Spazio Libri Editori, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armitage P, Berry G (1987) Statistical methods in medical research. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 371–378

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bente H, Flemming S, Helge B (1980) Patient information about cancer. Acta Chir Scand 146:309–311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blanchard GC, Ruckdeschel CJ, Cohen ER, et al (1981) Attitude toward cancer: the impact of a comprehensive oncology course on the second year medical students. Cancer 47:2756–2762

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brewin TB (1977) The cancer patient: communication and morale. Br Med J 2:1623–1627

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Codice Dentologico (1995) Informazione e consenso del paziente, articles 29 and 31. In: Ordine Provinciale dei Medici della Provincia di Pordenone. Ordine dei Medici Pordenone, pp 11–13

  8. Greenwald HP, Nevitt MC (1982) Physicians' attitudes toward communication with cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 16:591–594

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holland JC, Geary N, Marchini A, Tross S (1987) An international survey of physicians' attitudes and practice in regard to revealing the diagnosis of cancer. Cancer Invest 5:151–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lebovitis AH, Croen LG, et al (1984) Attitudes towards cancer. Development of the cancer attitudes questionnaire. Cancer 54:1124–1129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. McIntosh J (1974) Process of communication, information seeking and control associated with cancer. Soc Sci Med 8:167–187

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McIntosh J (1976) Patients awareness and desire for information about diagnosed but undisclosed malignant disease. Lancet 7:300–303

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morasso G, Cianfriglia F, Crotti N, et al (1987) A safer death. Multidisciplinary aspects of terminal care. In: Gilmore A, Gilmore S (eds) Physicians' attitudes in the management of terminally ill patients, pp 191–204

  14. Mosconi P, Meyerowitza BE, Liberati MC, et alon behalf of GIVO (1991) Disclosure of breast cancer diagnosis: patient and physician reports. Ann Oncol 2:273–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Novack DH, Plumer R, Smith RL, et al (1979) Changes in physicians' attitudes towards telling the cancer patient. JAMA 241:897–900

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oken D (1961) What to tell cancer patients: a study of medical attitudes. JAMA 117:1120–1128

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pronzato P, Bertelli G, Losardo P, et al (1994) What do advanced cancer patients know of their disease? A report from Italy. Support Care Cancer 2:242–244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ravazi D, Dewaux N, Marchal S, et al (1993) The effect of a 24-h psychological training program on attitudes, communication skills and occupational stress in oncology: a randomised study. Eur J Cancer 29A:1858–1863

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamburini M, Gamba A, Morasso G, et al (1988) Comunicazione della diagnosi di canceo e terapie dei malati in fase terminale. Federazione Med 41:487–492

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Annunziata, M.A., Rossi, C., Talamini, R. et al. Physicians and death: Comments and behaviour of 605 doctors in the north-east of Italy. Support Care Cancer 4, 334–340 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01788839

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01788839

Key words

Navigation